Replaceability argument
Philosophical argument that has been used to reject vegetarianism / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Replaceability argument?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
The replaceability argument, or the logic of the larder, is a philosophical argument that has been used to reject vegetarianism. It holds that consuming nonhuman animal products is good for animals because if they were not consumed, fewer animals would be brought into existence.[1][2] The argument has particularly been engaged with within the context of utilitarianism.[3]