S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection
2006 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, 547 U.S. 370 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving licensing requirements under the Clean Water Act. The Court ruled unanimously that hydroelectric dams were subject to section 401 of the Act, which conditioned federal licensing for a licensed activity that could result in "any discharge" into navigable waters upon the receipt of a state certification that water protection laws would not be violated. The Court believed that since the Act did not define the word "discharge" it should be given its ordinary meaning, such that the simple flowing forth of water from a dam qualified.
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection | |
---|---|
Argued February 21, 2006 Decided May 15, 2006 | |
Full case name | S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, et al. |
Citations | 547 U.S. 370 (more) 126 S. Ct. 1843; 164 L. Ed. 2d 625; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 3955; 74 U.S.L.W. 4244 |
Case history | |
Prior | Board decision affirmed, 2004 Me. Super. LEXIS 115 (Me. Super. Ct. May 4, 2004); affirmed, 868 A.2d 210 (Me. 2005); cert. granted, 126 S. Ct. 415 (2005) |
Holding | |
Because the outflow of water from a hydroelectric dam constitutes a "discharge" into navigable waters, it is subject to the Clean Water Act's requirement of state certification. Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Souter, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito; Scalia (all but Part III–C) |
Laws applied | |
33 U.S.C. § 1341 (Clean Water Act § 401) |