SQL
Relational database programming language From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Structured Query Language (SQL) (pronounced /ˌɛsˌkjuˈɛl/ S-Q-L; or alternatively as /ˈsiːkwəl/ "sequel") [4][5] is a domain-specific language used to manage data, especially in a relational database management system (RDBMS). It is particularly useful in handling structured data, i.e., data incorporating relations among entities and variables.
| Paradigm | Declarative |
|---|---|
| Family | Query language |
| Designed by | Donald D. Chamberlin Raymond F. Boyce |
| Developer | ISO/IEC JTC 1 (Joint Technical Committee 1) / SC 32 (Subcommittee 32) / WG 3 (Working Group 3) |
| First appeared | 1973 |
| Stable release | SQL:2023
/ June 2023 |
| Typing discipline | Static, strong |
| OS | Cross-platform |
| Website | www |
| Major implementations | |
| Many | |
| Dialects | |
| Influenced by | |
| Datalog | |
| Influenced | |
| CQL, LINQ, SPARQL, SOQL, PowerShell,[1] JPQL, jOOQ, N1QL, GQL | |
| |
| Filename extension |
.sql |
|---|---|
| Internet media type | |
| Developed by | ISO/IEC |
| Initial release | 1986 |
| Type of format | Database |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 9075 |
| Open format? | Yes |
| Website | www |
Introduced in the 1970s, SQL offered two main advantages over older read–write APIs such as ISAM or VSAM. Firstly, it introduced the concept of accessing many records with one single command. Secondly, it eliminates the need to specify how to reach a record, i.e., with or without an index.
Originally based upon relational algebra and tuple relational calculus, SQL consists of many types of statements,[6] which may be informally classed as sublanguages, commonly: Data query Language (DQL), Data Definition Language (DDL), Data Control Language (DCL), and Data Manipulation Language (DML).[7]
The scope of SQL includes data query, data manipulation (insert, update, and delete), data definition (schema creation and modification), and data access control. Although SQL is essentially a declarative language (4GL), it also includes procedural elements.
SQL was one of the first commercial languages to use Edgar F. Codd's relational model. The model was described in his influential 1970 paper, "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks".[8] Despite not entirely adhering to the relational model as described by Codd, SQL became the most widely used database language.[9][10]
SQL became a standard of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1986 and of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1987.[11] Since then, the standard has been revised multiple times to include a larger set of features and incorporate common extensions. Despite the existence of standards, virtually no implementations in existence adhere to it fully, and most SQL code requires at least some changes before being ported to different database systems.
History
Summarize
Perspective
SQL was initially developed at IBM by Donald D. Chamberlin and Raymond F. Boyce after learning about the relational model from Edgar F. Codd[12] in the early 1970s.[13] This version, initially called SEQUEL (Structured English Query Language), was designed to manipulate and retrieve data stored in IBM's original quasirelational database management system, System R, which a group at IBM San Jose Research Laboratory had developed during the 1970s.[13]
Chamberlin and Boyce's first attempt at a relational database language was SQUARE (Specifying Queries in A Relational Environment), but it was difficult to use due to subscript/superscript notation. After moving to the San Jose Research Laboratory in 1973, they began work on a sequel to SQUARE.[12] The original name SEQUEL, which is widely regarded as a pun on QUEL, the query language of Ingres,[14] was later changed to SQL (dropping the vowels) because "SEQUEL" was a trademark of the UK-based Hawker Siddeley Dynamics Engineering Limited company.[15] The label SQL later became the acronym for Structured Query Language.[16]
After testing SQL at customer test sites to determine the usefulness and practicality of the system, IBM began developing commercial products based on their System R prototype, including System/38, SQL/DS, and IBM Db2, which were commercially available in 1979, 1981, and 1983, respectively.[17]
In the late 1970s, Relational Software, Inc. (now Oracle Corporation) saw the potential of the concepts described by Codd, Chamberlin, and Boyce, and developed their own SQL-based RDBMS with aspirations of selling it to the U.S. Navy, Central Intelligence Agency, and other U.S. government agencies. In June 1979, Relational Software introduced one of the first commercially available implementations of SQL, Oracle V2 (Version2) for VAX computers.
By 1986, ANSI and ISO standard groups officially adopted the standard "Database Language SQL" language definition. New versions of the standard were published in 1989, 1992, 1996, 1999, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2011,[12] 2016 and most recently, 2023.[18]
Interoperability and standardization
Summarize
Perspective
Overview
SQL implementations are incompatible between vendors and do not necessarily completely follow standards. In particular, date and time syntax, string concatenation, NULLs, and comparison case sensitivity vary from vendor to vendor. PostgreSQL[19] and Mimer SQL[20] strive for standards compliance, though PostgreSQL does not adhere to the standard in all cases. For example, the folding of unquoted names to lower case in PostgreSQL is incompatible with the SQL standard,[21] which says that unquoted names should be folded to upper case.[22] Thus, according to the standard, Foo should be equivalent to FOO, not foo.
Popular implementations of SQL commonly omit support for basic features of Standard SQL, such as the DATE or TIME data types. The most obvious such examples, and incidentally the most popular commercial and proprietary SQL DBMSs, are Oracle (whose DATE behaves as DATETIME,[23][24] and lacks a TIME type)[25] and MS SQL Server (before the 2008 version). As a result, SQL code can rarely be ported between database systems without modifications.
Reasons for incompatibility
Several reasons for the lack of portability between database systems include:
- The complexity and size of the SQL standard means that most implementers do not support the entire standard.
- The SQL standard does not specify the database behavior in some important areas (e.g., indices, file storage), leaving implementations to decide how to behave.
- The SQL standard defers some decisions to individual implementations, such as how to name a results column that was not named explicitly.[26]: 207
- The SQL standard precisely specifies the syntax that a conforming database system must implement. However, the standard's specification of the semantics of language constructs is less well-defined, leading to ambiguity.
- Many database vendors have large existing customer bases; where the newer version of the SQL standard conflicts with the prior behavior of the vendor's database, the vendor may be unwilling to break backward compatibility.
- Little commercial incentive exists for vendors to make changing database suppliers easier (see vendor lock-in).
- Users evaluating database software tend to place other factors such as performance higher in their priorities than standards conformance.
Standardization history
SQL was adopted as a standard by the ANSI in 1986 as SQL-86[27] and the ISO in 1987.[11] It is maintained by ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, Subcommittee SC 32, Data management and interchange.
Until 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) data-management standards program certified SQL DBMS compliance with the SQL standard. Vendors now self-certify the compliance of their products.[28]
The original standard declared that the official pronunciation for "SQL" was an initialism: /ˌɛsˌkjuːˈɛl/ ("ess cue el").[9] Regardless, many English-speaking database professionals (including Donald Chamberlin himself[29]) use the acronym-like pronunciation of /ˈsiːkwəl/ ("sequel"),[30] mirroring the language's prerelease development name, "SEQUEL".[13][15][29]
The SQL standard has gone through a number of revisions:
| Year | Official standard | Informal name |
Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 1987 |
ANSI X3.135:1986 ISO/IEC 9075:1987 FIPS PUB 127 |
SQL-86 SQL-87 |
First formalized by ANSI, adopted as FIPS PUB 127 |
| 1989 | ANSI X3.135-1989 ISO/IEC 9075:1989 FIPS PUB 127-1 |
SQL-89 | Minor revision that added integrity constraints, adopted as FIPS PUB 127-1 |
| 1992 | ANSI X3.135-1992 ISO/IEC 9075:1992 FIPS PUB 127-2 |
SQL-92 SQL2 |
Major revision (ISO 9075), Entry Level SQL-92, adopted as FIPS PUB 127-2 |
| 1999 | ISO/IEC 9075:1999 | SQL:1999 SQL3 |
Added regular expression matching, recursive queries (e.g., transitive closure), triggers, support for procedural and control-of-flow statements, nonscalar types (arrays), and some object-oriented features (e.g., structured types), support for embedding SQL in Java (SQL/OLB) and vice versa (SQL/JRT) |
| 2003 | ISO/IEC 9075:2003 | SQL:2003 | Introduced XML-related features (SQL/XML), window functions, standardized sequences, and columns with autogenerated values (including identity columns) |
| 2006 | ISO/IEC 9075-14:2006 | SQL:2006 | Adds Part 14, defines ways that SQL can be used with XML. It defines ways of importing and storing XML data in an SQL database, manipulating it within the database, and publishing both XML and conventional SQL data in XML form. In addition, it lets applications integrate queries into their SQL code with XQuery, the XML Query Language published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), to concurrently access ordinary SQL-data and XML documents.[31] |
| 2008 | ISO/IEC 9075:2008 | SQL:2008 | Legalizes ORDER BY outside cursor definitions. Adds INSTEAD OF triggers, TRUNCATE statement,[32] FETCH clause |
| 2011 | ISO/IEC 9075:2011 | SQL:2011 | Adds temporal data (PERIOD FOR)[33] (more information at Temporal database#History). Enhancements for window functions and FETCH clause.[34] |
| 2016 | ISO/IEC 9075:2016 | SQL:2016 | Adds row pattern matching, polymorphic table functions, operations on JSON data stored in character string fields |
| 2019 | ISO/IEC 9075-15:2019 | SQL:2019 | Adds Part 15, multidimensional arrays (MDarray type and operators) |
| 2023 | ISO/IEC 9075:2023 | SQL:2023 | Adds data type JSON (SQL/Foundation); Adds Part 16, Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) |
Current standard
The standard is commonly denoted by the pattern: ISO/IEC 9075-n:yyyy Part n: title, or, as a shortcut, ISO/IEC 9075. Interested parties may purchase the standards documents from ISO,[35] IEC, or ANSI. Some old drafts are freely available.[36][37]
ISO/IEC 9075 is complemented by ISO/IEC 13249: SQL Multimedia and Application Packages and some Technical reports.
Syntax
Summarize
Perspective
A chart showing several of the SQL language elements comprising a single statement
The SQL language is subdivided into several language elements, including:
- Clauses, which are constituent components of statements and queries. (In some cases, these are optional.)[38]
- Expressions, which can produce either scalar values, or tables consisting of columns and rows of data
- Predicates, which specify conditions that can be evaluated to SQL three-valued logic (3VL) (true/false/unknown) or Boolean truth values and are used to limit the effects of statements and queries, or to change program flow.
- Queries, which retrieve the data based on specific criteria. This is an important element of SQL.
- Statements, which may have a persistent effect on schemata and data, or may control transactions, program flow, connections, sessions, or diagnostics.
- SQL statements also include the semicolon (";") statement terminator. Though not required on every platform, it is defined as a standard part of the SQL grammar.
- Insignificant whitespace is generally ignored in SQL statements and queries, making it easier to format SQL code for readability.
Procedural extensions
SQL is designed for a specific purpose: to query data contained in a relational database. SQL is a set-based, declarative programming language, not an imperative programming language like C or BASIC. However, extensions to Standard SQL add procedural programming language functionality, such as control-of-flow constructs.
In addition to the standard SQL/PSM extensions and proprietary SQL extensions, procedural and object-oriented programmability is available on many SQL platforms via DBMS integration with other languages. The SQL standard defines SQL/JRT extensions (SQL Routines and Types for the Java Programming Language) to support Java code in SQL databases. Microsoft SQL Server 2005 uses the SQLCLR (SQL Server Common Language Runtime) to host managed .NET assemblies in the database, while prior versions of SQL Server were restricted to unmanaged extended stored procedures primarily written in C. PostgreSQL lets users write functions in a wide variety of languages—including Perl, Python, Tcl, JavaScript (PL/V8) and C.[39]
Alternatives
Summarize
Perspective
A distinction should be made between alternatives to SQL as a language, and alternatives to the relational model itself. Below are proposed relational alternatives to the SQL language. See navigational database and NoSQL for alternatives to the relational model.
- .QL: object-oriented Datalog
- 4D Query Language (4D QL)
- Datalog: critics suggest that Datalog has two advantages over SQL: it has cleaner semantics, which facilitates program understanding and maintenance, and it is more expressive, in particular for recursive queries.[40]
- HTSQL: URL based query method
- IBM Business System 12 (IBM BS12): one of the first fully relational database management systems, introduced in 1982
- ISBL
- jOOQ: SQL implemented in Java as an internal domain-specific language
- Java Persistence Query Language (JPQL): The query language used by the Java Persistence API and Hibernate persistence library
- JavaScript: MongoDB implements its query language in a JavaScript API.
- LINQ: Runs SQL statements written like language constructs to query collections directly from inside .Net code
- Object Query Language
- QBE (Query By Example) created by Moshè Zloof, IBM 1977
- QUEL introduced in 1974 by the U.C. Berkeley Ingres project, closer to tuple relational calculus than SQL
- XQuery
Distributed SQL processing
Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA) was designed by a workgroup within IBM from 1988 to 1994. DRDA enables network-connected relational databases to cooperate to fulfill SQL requests.[41][42]
An interactive user or program can issue SQL statements to a local RDB and receive tables of data and status indicators in reply from remote RDBs. SQL statements can also be compiled and stored in remote RDBs as packages and then invoked by package name. This is important for the efficient operation of application programs that issue complex, high-frequency queries. It is especially important when the tables to be accessed are located in remote systems.
The messages, protocols, and structural components of DRDA are defined by the Distributed Data Management Architecture. Distributed SQL processing ala DRDA is distinctive from contemporary distributed SQL databases.
Criticisms
Summarize
Perspective
Design
SQL deviates in several ways from its theoretical foundation, the relational model and its tuple calculus. In that model, a table is a set of tuples, while in SQL, tables and query results are lists of rows; the same row may occur multiple times, and the order of rows can be employed in queries (e.g., in the LIMIT clause). Critics argue that SQL should be replaced with a language that returns strictly to the original foundation: for example, see The Third Manifesto by Hugh Darwen and C.J. Date (2006, ISBN 0-321-39942-0).
Orthogonality and completeness
Early specifications did not support major features, such as primary keys. Result sets could not be named, and subqueries had not been defined. These were added in 1992.[12]
The lack of sum types has been described as a roadblock to full use of SQL's user-defined types. JSON support, for example, needed to be added by a new standard in 2016.[43]
Null
The concept of Null is the subject of some debate. The Null marker indicates the absence of a value, and is distinct from a value of 0 for an integer column or an empty string for a text column. The concept of Nulls enforces the 3-valued-logic in SQL, which is a concrete implementation of the general 3-valued logic.[12]
Duplicates
Another popular criticism is that it allows duplicate rows, making integration with languages such as Python, whose data types might make accurately representing the data difficult,[12] in terms of parsing and by the absence of modularity. This is usually avoided by declaring a primary key, or a unique constraint, with one or more columns that uniquely identify a row in the table.
Impedance mismatch
In a sense similar to object–relational impedance mismatch, a mismatch occurs between the declarative SQL language and the procedural languages in which SQL is typically embedded.[citation needed]
SQL data types
The SQL standard defines three kinds of data types (chapter 4.1.1 of SQL/Foundation):
- predefined data types
- constructed types
- user-defined types.
Constructed types are one of ARRAY, MULTISET, REF(erence), or ROW. User-defined types are comparable to classes in object-oriented language with their own constructors, observers, mutators, methods, inheritance, overloading, overwriting, interfaces, and so on. Predefined data types are intrinsically supported by the implementation.
Predefined data types
- Character types
- Character (CHAR)
- Character varying (VARCHAR)
- Character large object (CLOB)
- National character types
- National character (NCHAR)
- National character varying (NCHAR VARYING)
- National character large object (NCLOB)
- Binary types
- Binary (BINARY)
- Binary varying (VARBINARY)
- Binary large object (BLOB)
- Numeric types
- Exact numeric types (NUMERIC, DECIMAL, SMALLINT, INTEGER, BIGINT)
- Approximate numeric types (FLOAT, REAL, DOUBLE PRECISION)
- Decimal floating-point type (DECFLOAT)
- Datetime types (DATE, TIME, TIMESTAMP)
- Interval type (INTERVAL)
- Boolean
- XML (see SQL/XML)[44]
- JSON
See also
- Object database
- List of relational database management systems
- Comparison of relational database management systems
- Comparison of object–relational database management systems
- Query by Example
- SQL reserved words
- SQL syntax
- Oracle PL/SQL
- Microsoft Transact-SQL (T-SQL)
- Online transaction processing (OLTP)
- Online analytical processing (OLAP)
- Data warehouse
- Relational data stream management system
- NoSQL
- MUMPS
- Hierarchical database model
- Star schema
- Snowflake schema
Notes
References
Sources
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.