Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

2022 United States Senate election in Nevada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2022 United States Senate election in Nevada
Remove ads

The 2022 United States Senate election in Nevada was held on November 8, 2022, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Nevada. Incumbent Democratic senator Catherine Cortez Masto won re-election to a second term, narrowly defeating Republican challenger Adam Laxalt.[1] Nevada's election results were slowed due to state law that allowed voters to submit mail-in ballots until November 12, and allowed voters to fix clerical problems in their mail-in ballots until November 14, 2022.[2] No Republican has won this specific U.S. Senate seat since Adam Laxalt's grandfather Paul Laxalt won a second full term in 1980.

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...

According to exit polls, Cortez Masto won 62% of Latinos, 64% of young voters, and 52% of women.[3]

Cortez Masto made protecting abortion rights a central issue of her campaign.[4] Many experts and forecasters saw Nevada as Republicans' best chance to pickup a seat in the Senate. Despite Laxalt leading in most polls, Cortez Masto narrowly won re-election by a little less than 8,000 votes.

Cortez Masto flipped Washoe County, improving her 2016 voteshare by 1.7%, although Laxalt improved on Joe Heck's margin in rural counties, and performed slightly better in Clark County. The incumbent Democrat's improvements in Washoe compared to 2016 proved to be decisive, as her victory margin there was slightly larger than in Nevada as a whole. With a narrow margin of 0.78%, this was the closest Senate race of the 2022 election cycle and the closest Senate election in Nevada since 1998.

Remove ads

Democratic primary

Summarize
Perspective

Candidates

Nominee

Eliminated in primary

Endorsements

Results

Thumb
Results by county:
  Cortez Masto
  •   60–70%
  •   70–80%
  •   80–90%
  •   90–100%
More information Party, Candidate ...
Remove ads

Republican primary

Summarize
Perspective

Candidates

Nominee

Eliminated in primary

Declined

Debates

More information No., Date ...
  1. Minor candidates that didn't participate in any of the debates are omitted.

Endorsements

Sam Brown (eliminated in primary)
Adam Laxalt

Executive Branch officials

U.S. Senators

Statewide officials

Individuals

Organizations

Labor unions

Polling

Graphical summary

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Hypothetical polling
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...

Results

Thumb
Results by county:
  Laxalt
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  Brown
  •   40–50%
More information Party, Candidate ...
Remove ads

Libertarian primary

Candidates

Declared

  • Neil Scott, accountant[6]

Independent American primary

Candidates

Declared

Independents

Candidates

Declared

  • Barry Lindemann, asset manager[73]

Not on ballot

  • J. J. Destin, truck driver[74]
  • Gretchen Rae Lowe[74]

General election

Summarize
Perspective

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...

Endorsements

Catherine Cortez Masto (D)

U.S. Presidents

Executive Branch officials

U.S. Senators

State legislators

Local officials

Individuals

Organizations

Newspapers

Labor unions

Adam Laxalt (R)

U.S. Presidents

Executive Branch officials

U.S. Senators

U.S. Representatives

Governors

State officials

State legislators

Local officials

Party officials

Individuals

Organizations

Labor unions

Polling

Aggregate polls

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...

Graphical summary

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Hypothetical polling

Catherine Cortez Masto vs. Sam Brown

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...

Results

Thumb
Swing by county
Legend
  •   Democratic — +5-7.5%
  •   Democratic — +2.5-5%
  •   Democratic — +0-2.5%
  •   Republican — +0-2.5%
  •   Republican — +2.5-5%
  •   Republican — +5-7.5%
  •   Republican — +7.5-10%

Cortez Masto won urban Clark County and Washoe County, home to Las Vegas and Reno respectively. Combined, these two counties contain more than 80% of the state's total population. While her margin in Clark County fell from 11% in 2016 to 8% in this election, she flipped Washoe County, which she lost by less than 1% in 2016, with a 4% margin of victory. Laxalt won by landslide margins in Nevada's rural counties, but they are lightly populated and cast less than 16% of the total vote. In the end, Cortez Masto's victories in the state's two largest counties gave her too large a lead for Laxalt to overcome in rural Nevada. As of 2025, no Republican has won any U.S. Senate race in Nevada since 2012.

More information Party, Candidate ...

By county

More information By county, County ...

By congressional district

Cortez Masto won three of four congressional districts.[182]

More information District, Cortez Masto ...
Remove ads

See also

Notes

Summarize
Perspective
  1. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  2. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  3. Conrad, Perkins, and Rodriguez with 1%
  4. Conrad and Rodriguez with 1%; Perkins and Poliak with 0%
  5. Conrad, Perkins, Pollak, and Rodriguez with 1%
  6. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  7. Scott (L) with 1%; "Other" with 1%
  8. "Some other candidate/None of them" with 2%
  9. Scott (L) with 2%; "Another candidate" with 1%
  10. "Another candidate" with 2%
  11. "Third-party candidate" with 5%
  12. Lindemann (I) with 1%; Scott (L) with 1%; Rubinson (IA) with <1%
  13. Lindemann (I) with 1%; Scott (L) with 1%; Rubinson (IA) with 1%
  14. Scott (L) with 2%; Lindemann (I) with 1%; Rubinson (IA) with 1%
  15. Lindemann (I) with 2%; Rubinson (IA) with 1%; Scott (L) with 1%; "Refused" with 1%
  16. Rubinson (IA) with 2%; Scott (L) with 1%; "Refuse" with 1%
  17. Lindemann (I) with 1%; Scott (I) with 1%; Rubinson (IA) with <1%
  18. Scott (L) with 3%
  19. Rubinson (IA) with 1%; Scott (L) with 1%; Lindemann (I) with <1%
  20. "Another candidate" with 2%
  21. "Someone else" with 3%
  22. Scott (L) with 1%; "Another candidate" with 1%
  23. "Someone else" with 5%
  24. "Some other candidate" with 3%
  25. Scott (L) with 4%; Rubinson (IA) with 2%
  26. "Some other candidate" with 4%
  27. Lindemann (I) with 1%; Rubinson (IA) with 1%; Scott (L) with 1%
  28. Rubinson (IA) and Scott (L) with 2%
  29. "Other" with 3%
  30. "Other" with 3%
  31. Robinson (IA) with 1%; Scott (L) with 1%
  32. "Someone else" with 2%
  33. Scott (L) with 2%; "Other" with 3%
  34. Scott (L) with 4%; "Another candidate" with 2%
  35. Rubinson with 2%; Lindemann and Scott with 1%
  36. Scott with 2%; "Other" with 1%
  37. Scott with 2%; Rubinson with 1%; Lindemann with 0%

Partisan clients

  1. Poll sponsored by Laxalt's campaign
  2. This poll was sponsored by Club for Growth Action, which supports Laxalt
  3. Poll conducted for American Greatness, a conservative news and opinions site.
  4. Poll conducted for Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization.
  5. Poll conducted for BUSR, an online gambling website.
  6. Poll conducted for Univision.
  7. This poll was sponsored by the Environmental Voter Project
  8. This poll was sponsored by Future Majority and America's Future Majority Fund
  9. This poll was sponsored by Battle Born Values PAC
  10. This poll was sponsored by the National Republican Senatorial Committee
  11. Poll sponsored by Americas PAC
Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads