Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Bayanshiree Formation
Geological formation in Mongolia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
The Bayanshiree Formation (also known as Baynshiree/Baynshire, Baynshirenskaya Svita, Baysheen Shireh, or Bayan Shireh[1]) is a geological formation in Mongolia, that dates to the Cretaceous period. It was first described and established by Vasiliev et al. 1959.[2]
 |
Remove ads
Description
Summarize
Perspective
The Bayanshiree Formation is primarily composed by varicoloured claystones and sandstones with calcareous concretions and characterized by grey mudstones and yellowish-brown medium grained sandstones.[2][3] Up to 300 m (980 ft) thick, the most complete sections are found in the eastern Gobi Desert, consisting of fine-grained, often cross-stratified gray sandstone interbedded with claystone and concretionary, intraformational conglomerates with relatively thick units of red to brown mudstone in the upper part.[4][5] The Baynshire and Burkhant localities are mainly composed by mudstone, siltstone, sandstone, and conglomerates, with most of their sedimentation being fluvial.[6][7][8] The environments that were present on the Bayanshiree Formation consisted mainly on semi-arid climates with large water bodies, such as rivers or lakes.[9][8] Although it is considered to be partially lacustrine,[10] largescale cross-stratification in many of the sandstone layers at the Baynshire locality seem to indicate that a large meandering fluvial system was present. It has been implied that during the late Bayan Shirehnian times, large rivers with direct connections to the sea drained a prominent part of the eastern Gobi region.[4][7][9]
Stratigraphy
According to Jerzykiewicz and Russell, the Bayanshiree Formation can be divided into 2 informal units: upper and lower beds.[6] Danilov and colleagues have suggested that the lower beds are Cenomanian to early Turonian, and the upper beds are late Turonian to Santonian in age.[11] While the lower beds are composed by extensive conglomerate that indicates the ancient presence of very active rivers, the upper beds are mainly composed by mudstone and claystone that is interbedded by sandstone, indicating again, the presence of rivers but also lakes and other water bodies.[12]
Based on comparisons with other formations, Jerzykiewicz and Russell suggested that the Bayanshiree paleofauna seems to correspond best with the Turonian through early Campanian stages of the Late Cretaceous, about 93 to 80 million years ago.[6] However, examination of the magnetostratigraphy of the formation indicates that the entire Bayanshiree lies within the Cretaceous Long Normal, which lasted only until the end of the Santonian stage, giving a possible Cenomanian through Late Santonian age, between 98 and 83 million years ago.[7] In 2012, Averianov and Sues re-examined many formations from the Gobi Desert and using biostratigraphic occurrences and previous dating, the Bayanshiree Formation was considered to be Cenomanian to Santonian in age. The lower beds dating to 98 million and 90 million years ago (early Cenomanian to late Turonian), and the upper beds dating to 90 million and 83 million years ago (late Turonian to late Santonian).[9] Calcite U–Pb measurements performed by Kurumada and colleagues in 2020 have estimated the age of the Bayanshiree Formation between 95.9 ± 6.0 Ma and 89.6 ± 4.0 Ma.[13]
Correlations
A potential correlation between the Iren Dabasu Formation has been long suggested by most authors, mainly based on the highly similar vertebrate assemblages.[6][14][15][16] However, Van Itterbeeck et al. 2005 argued against this correlation concluding that instead, the Iren Dabasu Formation was coeval with the younger Nemegt Formation based on the charophyte and ostracode assemblages; therefore, these formations were dated to the Late Campanian-Early Maastrichtian.[17] Averianov and Sues instead proposed a correlation between the Bayanshiree, Iren Dabasu and Bissekty formations.[9] In 2015, Tsuihiji and team found the Iren Dabasu-Nemegt correlation to be inconsistent since the microfossil assemblages used by Van Itterbeeck and colleagues were not restricted to the Maastrichtian period and the similarities between these assemblages were most probably due to a similar deposition and climate settings.[18]
Remove ads
Paleobiota of the Bayanshiree Formation
Summarize
Perspective
In terms of biodiversity, therizinosaurs and turtles were the most abundant vertebrates across the formation, as evidenced on numerous remains.[11][19] Nevertheless, hadrosauroids were fairly abundant too, particularly at the Baynshire locality with numerous remains unearthed from this area and a new unnamed hadrosauroid. In addition, most specimens of Gobihadros come from this locality.[8][20][12] Also, niche partitioning has been reported within the therizinosaurids Erlikosaurus and Segnosaurus,[21] and the ankylosaurs Talarurus and Tsagantegia.[22] Mammals however, are extremely uncommon; Tsagandelta is the only mammal described so far.[23] Besides vertebrate fossils, abundant fossil fruits have been collected from the Bor Guvé and Khara Khutul localities and they are especially abundant at Bor Guvé. Although they resemble Abelmoschus esculentus their taxonomic position remains unclear and further examination is required.[24]
Color key
|
Notes Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; |
Crocodylomorphs
Fish
Flora
Mammals
Pterosaurs
Turtles
Dinosaurs
Ornithischians
Ankylosaurs
Ceratopsians
Hadrosaurs
Pachycephalosaurs
Sauropods
Theropods
Dromaeosaurids
Ornithomimosaurs
Oviraptorosaurs
Therizinosaurs
Troodontids
Tyrannosauroids
Other Theropods
Remove ads
See also
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads