Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Delta Eridani

Star in the constellation Eridanus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delta Eridani
Remove ads

Delta Eridani, Latinized from δ Eridani, also named Rana, is the fifth-brightest star in the constellation of Eridanus.

Quick Facts Observation data Epoch J2000 Equinox J2000, Constellation ...

The star is visible to the naked eye with an apparent magnitude of 3.54. It is relatively near to the Sun, with a distance of about 29.6 light-years as determined from parallax.[1] The star is drifting closer with a radial velocity of −6 km/s.[5]

Remove ads

Nomenclature

Delta Eridani is sometimes called Rana;[11] Rana means frog in Latin. This name first appeared as Rana Secunda, the "second frog", in Giuseppe Piazzi's star catalogue; this was likely a misattributed name for Beta Ceti (Diphda), known as the "second frog" in Arabic.[12] The name Rana was approved by the IAU Working Group on Star Names on 4 April 2022.[13]

In Chinese, 天苑 (Tiān Yuàn), meaning Celestial Meadows, refers to an asterism consisting of δ Eridani, γ Eridani, π Eridani, ε Eridani, ζ Eridani, η Eridani, π Ceti, τ1 Eridani, τ2 Eridani, τ3 Eridani, τ4 Eridani, τ5 Eridani, τ6 Eridani, τ7 Eridani, τ8 Eridani and τ9 Eridani.[14] Consequently, the Chinese name for δ Eridani itself is 天苑三 (Tiān Yuàn sān, English: the Third Star of Celestial Meadows.)[15]

Remove ads

Characteristics

The stellar classification of this star is K0 IV,[3] matching a subgiant star that has exhausted its core hydrogen. This has caused the star to expand and become cooler than a comparable main sequence star. Stellar modelling indicates it is near the end of the subgiant stage and about to transition into a giant. It is an estimated six billion years old[8] with 33% more mass than the Sun.[9] The star has 2.35 times the size of the Sun and is radiating three times the Sun's luminosity from its photosphere at an effective temperature of 5,022 K.[7]

Delta Eridani was catalogued as a suspected RS Canum Venaticorum variable in 1983,[16] varying slightly in brightness between magnitudes 3.51 and 3.56,[17] although subsequent observations did not bear this out[18] and an examination of the star using interferometry did not detect the presence of a companion at the expected distance.[8] Thus, this classification is now considered erroneous.[19] The star has a very low level of chromospheric activity.[19] A low projected rotational velocity of under 1 km/s and the lack of radial velocity variation suggest that this star is being viewed from nearly pole-on.[8]

Remove ads

See also

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads