Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Disjunction elimination

Rule of inference of propositional logic From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

In propositional logic, disjunction elimination[1][2] (sometimes named proof by cases, case analysis, or or elimination) is the valid argument form and rule of inference that allows one to eliminate a disjunctive statement from a logical proof. It is the inference that if a statement implies a statement and a statement also implies , then if either or is true, then has to be true. The reasoning is simple: since at least one of the statements P and R is true, and since either of them would be sufficient to entail Q, Q is certainly true.

Quick Facts Type, Field ...
Remove ads

An example in English:

If I'm inside, I have my wallet on me.
If I'm outside, I have my wallet on me.
It is true that either I'm inside or I'm outside.
Therefore, I have my wallet on me.

It is the rule can be stated as:

where the rule is that whenever instances of "", and "" and "" appear on lines of a proof, "" can be placed on a subsequent line.

Remove ads

Formal notation

Summarize
Perspective

The disjunction elimination rule may be written in sequent notation:

where is a metalogical symbol meaning that is a syntactic consequence of , and and in some logical system;

and expressed as a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

where , , and are propositions expressed in some formal system.

Remove ads

See also

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads