Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

How Europe Underdeveloped Africa

1972 book by Walter Rodney From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How Europe Underdeveloped Africa
Remove ads

How Europe Underdeveloped Africa is a 1972 book written by Walter Rodney that describes how Africa was deliberately exploited and underdeveloped by European colonial regimes. One of his main arguments throughout the book is that Africa developed Europe at the same rate that Europe underdeveloped Africa.

Quick Facts Author, Language ...

Rodney argues that a combination of power politics and economic exploitation of Africa by Europeans led to the poor state of African political and economic development evident in the late 20th century. Though, he did not intend "to remove the ultimate responsibility for development from the shoulders of Africans... [He believes that] every African has a responsibility to understand the [capitalist] system and work for its overthrow."

This book, along with Frantz Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth, is a popular example of 20th century books concerning African development and post-colonial theory.

Remove ads

Background

Rodney was a Marxist scholar and activist from Guyana, educated at the University of the West Indies and the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London. His work was grounded in both historical research and his political commitment to Pan-Africanism, Black liberation, and anti-imperialism.[1] First published in London by Bogle-L'Ouverture Publications in 1972 (in partnership with Tanzanian Publishing House), the book shaped the study of Africa in many disciplines.[2] Rodney wrote the text while lecturing in Tanzania at the University of Dar es Salaam,[3] during the presidency of Julius Nyerere. Tanzanian scholar Karim F Hirji has described the work as, "no doubt the 20th century's most important and influential book on African history."[4]

Remove ads

Synopsis

Rodney argues that to fully appreciate and understand the effect of European exploitation on Africa, four distinct issues need to be addressed: a reconstruction of pre-European Africa's developmental condition, that of pre-expansionist Europe, and their contributions to each other's present condition, developed or otherwise. After an introductory chapter in which he definitionally discusses development, underdevelopment, and associated terminologies in their historical and contemporary contexts, he devotes a chapter to each of these four issues. He concludes the book with a chapter critiquing arguments that promote the "supposed benefit of colonialism". In this chapter, he also explains the means through which colonialism is linked to Africa's present underdevelopment.[citation needed]

Remove ads

Themes

Underdevelopment

Rodney defines underdevelopment not as the absence of development, but as the active process by which certain societies become impoverished through their interaction with others. He writes: "The question is not whether Africa is underdeveloped but who and what made Africa underdeveloped."[5]

Colonial education

Rodney critiques colonial education as a tool for mental colonization, designed to create obedient clerks rather than empowered citizens or intellectuals.[5]

Imperialism

The book situates African colonialism within a larger framework of imperialist expansion. Rodney emphasizes how capitalism in Europe required raw materials, cheap labor, and markets—all provided by Africa.[6]

Self-reliance and revolution

Rodney concludes that African liberation depends on socialist development, popular mobilization, and Pan-African solidarity.[5]

Impact and reception

How Europe Underdeveloped Africa became a cornerstone text for postcolonial African studies, revolutionary movements, and anti-imperialist scholarship. It has been taught in universities across the Global South and remains central to debates on development, reparations, and global inequality.[7]

The book has influenced generations of African and Caribbean intellectuals, including Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o and Samir Amin. It remains widely cited in academic and activist circles.[8][dead link]

While praised for its rigor and revolutionary spirit, the book has also been criticized by some Western scholars for its ideological stance and reliance on Marxist analysis. Nonetheless, its historical narrative and data have held up under decades of scrutiny.[9]

Remove ads

Editions

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads