Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
IAS 18
Superseded international accounting standard for revenue From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
IAS 18 was an International Accounting Standard issued by the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) and subsequently adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). It outlined the accounting treatment for revenue arising from certain types of transactions and events.[1] In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which superseded IAS 18 for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.[2]
Remove ads
Scope
IAS 18 applied to revenue arising from three specific categories of transactions:[3]
- The sale of goods.
- The rendering of services.
- The use by others of entity assets yielding interest, royalties, and dividends.
Recognition Criteria
Under IAS 18, revenue was recognized only when it was probable that future economic benefits would flow to the entity and these benefits could be measured reliably.[4]
Sale of Goods
For the sale of goods, revenue was recognized when all of the following conditions were satisfied:[5]
- The entity transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods to the buyer.
- The entity retained neither continuing managerial involvement nor effective control over the goods sold.
- The amount of revenue and the costs incurred could be measured reliably.
Rendering of Services
When the outcome of a service transaction could be estimated reliably, revenue was recognized by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction (often called the percentage-of-completion method).[6]
Remove ads
Measurement
Revenue was measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.[7] If the inflow of cash or cash equivalents was deferred, the fair value of the consideration was determined by discounting all future receipts using an imputed rate of interest.[8]
Comparison with IFRS 15
The transition from IAS 18 to IFRS 15 marked a shift from a "risks and rewards" model to a "control" model. Critics of IAS 18 argued that the standard provided limited guidance for complex transactions, such as multiple-element arrangements (bundled goods and services), leading to diversity in practice.[9]
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads