KIC 9832227

KIC 9832227 is a contact binary star system in the constellation Cygnus, located about 2,060 light-years away. It is also identified as an eclipsing binary with an orbital period of almost 11 hours.^[5]

KIC 9832227

KIC 9832227 (circled)
Observation data Epoch J2000      Equinox J2000
Constellation	Cygnus[1]
Right ascension	19h 29m 15.950s[2]
Declination	+46° 37′ 19.86″[2]
Apparent magnitude (V)	12.27 – 12.46[3]
Characteristics
Spectral type	K2III/IV[4]
Variable type	Eclipsing[5]
Astrometry
Proper motion (μ)	RA: −9.505[2] mas/yr Dec.: −5.718[2] mas/yr
Parallax (π)	1.5798±0.0134 mas[2]
Distance	2,060 ± 20 ly (633 ± 5 pc)
Orbit[6]
Period (P)	0.4282579 days
Semi-major axis (a)	2.992 R☉
Inclination (i)	53.2°
Periastron epoch (T)	2455688.49913
Details[6]
A
Mass	1.395 M☉
Radius	1.581 R☉
Luminosity	2.609 L☉
Surface gravity (log g)	4.19 cgs
Temperature	5800 K
Rotational velocity (v sin i)	149.7 km/s
B
Mass	0.318 M☉
Radius	0.830 R☉
Luminosity	0.789 L☉
Surface gravity (log g)	4.10 cgs
Temperature	5920 K
Rotational velocity (v sin i)	84.7 km/s
Other designations
2MASS J19291594+4637198, KIC 9832227, ASAS J192916+4637.3, GSC 03543-01211
Database references
SIMBAD	data
KIC	data

Incorrect 2022 merger prediction

A light curve for KIC 9832227, plotted from TESS data^[7]

In 2017, the system was predicted to result in a merger in 2022.2 (± 0.6 years), producing a luminous red nova (LRN) reaching an apparent magnitude of 2,^[8] or about the brightness of Polaris, the North Star. The LRN would remain visible to the naked eye for roughly a month. The merger of the two stellar cores was predicted to give birth to a new, hotter, more massive main-sequence star. However, a reanalysis of the data in September 2018 revealed that the prediction had been based on a wrongly timed observation, negating the predicted merger.^[9][10][11]

The period of the variations in KIC 9832227 has been observed to be growing shorter since 2013, leading to the prediction of the merger in or around 2022.^[12] In September 2018, it was announced that the original prediction was based on a dataset which timing had been erroneously offset by 12 hours—an error which appeared to exaggerate the decay rate of the orbital period. Correcting for the error shows that the period had actually been increasing up to about 2008. The cause for the period variation is still unknown, but it was determined the system would not be merging at the predicted time.^[9][10][13]