Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

List of statements by Israeli officials cited as genocidal

Statements by Israeli officials during the Gaza genocide From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

This is a list of public statements from officials in the Israeli government and Israel Defense Forces (IDF) that have been the primary sources on which a 2025 United Nations Commission of Inquiry[1] and South Africa's 2023 proceedings to the ICJ[2] established genocidal intent by Israel in the Gaza genocide.

Remove ads

Statements as evidence of genocidal intent

According to the 2025 UNHRC report (available online), genocidal intent in the Gaza genocide has been established through "statements expressing an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the protected group."[1][a]

South Africa's 2025 proceedings (available online) say intent was established due to how "statements by Israeli decision-makers and military officials indicate in and of themselves a clear intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a group."[2] The proceedings further claimed statements by "prominent members of Israeli society" constitute "clear direct and public incitement to genocide, which has gone unchecked and unpunished by the Israeli authorities."[2]

Remove ads

List

Summarize
Perspective

All statements in this list are explicitly mentioned, or paraphrased and cited, in either the UNHRC report or South Africa's proceedings.

More information Speaker, Position at time of statement ...
Remove ads

See also

Interpretations

  1. Genocidal intent was also established in the report through examining patterns of behavior in the "totality of evidence."[1]
  2. The UNHRC report and South Africa's proceedings argued that invoking the Nakba, an ethnic cleansing in which over 80 percent of the Palestinian population was forced from or fled their homes, demonstrates intent to punish the civilian population for the October 7 attacks.[1][2]
  3. Genocide scholars have described biblical passages about Amalek as genocidal,[6][7][8] as God commands Saul to go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.[9] The UNHRC report and South Africa's proceedings both characterized Netanyahu's comparison between Amalek and Palestinians as genocidal.[1][2]
  4. South Africa's proceedings argue a distinction between humanity (Israelis) and the law of the jungle (Palestinians) is dehumanizing towards Palestinians, demonstrating genocidal intent.
  5. South Africa's proceedings argue this rhetoric reflects failure of distinction being made between being made between Hamas combatants and Palestinian civilians.
  6. The UNHRC report argued this rhetoric aligns with Israel's use of heavy bombardment with explosive weapons with wide-area effect, rather than precision guided (or "smart") weapons, reflecting a failure to distinguish between civilians and combatants.[1]
  7. The UNHRC report argued that while this statement was not explicitly genocidal, it implied an entire nation is responsible for the attack of 7 October 2023 and therefore may reasonably be interpreted as incitement to the Israeli security forces personnel to target the Palestinians in Gaza as being collectively culpable. The report also found later clarifications by Herzog stating many innocent Palestinians ... don't agree were an attempt to deflect the responsibility for the initial statement.[1]
  8. Beit Hanoun is a city in northern Gaza that has been "entirely devastated by the Israeli army." The biblical passage in question entails two bible characters indiscriminately killing all males in a city.[2]
  9. The UNHRC report argued that since the speech was given within the context of a total siege and blockade, the term 'human animals' would reasonably be interpreted as directed at the entire population in Gaza.[1]
Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads