Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Meet Maxwell Archer

1940 British film From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Meet Maxwell Archer
Remove ads

Meet Maxwell Archer is a 1940 British comedy mystery film directed by John Paddy Carstairs and starring John Loder, Leueen MacGrath and Athole Stewart.[2][3] It was written by Katherine Strueby based on the 1938 novel Archer Plus 20 by Hugh Clevely.[4] It was released in the U.S. in 1942 as Maxwell Archer, Detective.[5]

Quick facts Directed by, Written by ...
Remove ads

Plot summary

Maxwell Archer, a private detective, attempts to clear a young man wrongly accused of murder.

Cast

Critical reception

Summarize
Perspective

The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "This acceptable mixture of espionage and crime is put over in the popular manner with comedy and romance. The opening is rather jerky, but once the problem is posed the pace is swift, and suspense and interest are maintained to the exciting climax. The cast acts well together. John Loder makes an upstanding typical sleuth of the Raffles brand, and Leucen MacGrath appears to have acting ability as well as good looks. The technical presentation is good."[6]

Kine Weekly wrote: "The opening sequences are a little sketchy, but the air is quickly cleared once the exciting plot gets into its stride. From the half-way mark onwards the film is responsible for romance, laughter and thrills in plenty. Its rattling good entertainment is aided and abetted by eager teamwork and impeccable technical presentation, Maxwell Archer is entitled to take his place with the Saint, Raffles and other immortals of comedy crime fiction."[7]

Picturegoer wrote: "The opening sequences are a trifle sketchy, but once the story gets under way it is seldom dull, while the thrills are helped out by ample comedy relief and pleasant romance. Leueen MacGrath reveals an interesting personality as well as acting ability as Sarah and Ronald Adam, Syd Crossley and Peter Halliwell stand out among the other cast members."[8]

TV Guide wrote, "Oh where is Sherlock Holmes when you need him? Poorly made with a dopey script that gives the actors little room to breathe, let alone act."[9][permanent dead link]

In British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "average", writing: "Unsubtle but swift paced thriller."[10]

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads