Multi-source hypothesis
Proposed solution to the synoptic problem From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Multi-source hypothesis is a proposed solution to the synoptic problem, holding that Matthew, Mark, and Luke are not directly interdependent but have each drawn from a distinct combination of earlier documents. It encompasses a family of theories differing in the particulars of the nature and relationships of these earlier documents.
 | This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (November 2013) |
| |
| Theory Information | |
|---|---|
| Order | Proto, Q A, B Matt, Mark, Luke |
| Additional Sources | Q-source, Proto, A, B |
| Gospels' Sources | |
| Matthew | A, Q |
| Mark | A, B |
| Luke | B, Q |
| Theory History | |
| Originator | Herbert Marsh |
| Proponents |
|
An early form of the theory was proposed by Herbert Marsh over two centuries ago.[1] More recently, Marie-Émile Boismard proposed a structurally similar theory,[2] which was further developed by Philippe Rolland[3] and Delbert Burkett. Alan Kirk and Christopher Skinner have critiqued Burkett’s model for the Synoptic Problem.[4][5][6]
According to these theories, the common material among the three synoptic gospels ultimately derives from a proto-gospel somewhat like Mark. This proto-gospel underwent two independent revisions, A and B. Mark was formed by recombining these two revisions. Matthew built upon A and Luke upon B. Both Matthew and Luke also drew from a common source Q, as well as other sources for their unique material.
See also
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.