R. F. Holland

R.F. Holland was a philosopher who was a part of the group "The Swansea Wittgensteinians", or "Swansea School", in the philosophy of religion which sought to interpret religion in light of the works of Ludwig Wittgenstein.^[1]

R. F. Holland
Born	Roy Fraser Holland (1923-03-18)March 18, 1923 Manchester, England
Died	March 5, 2013(2013-03-05) (aged 89)

Biography

He attended Manchester Grammar School and University College, Oxford. In 1942, he joined the army and served as a regimental officer across Africa and South-East Asia. He later returned to Oxford in 1948 and graduated in Literae Humaniores.^[2]

He taught at the University College Swansea from 1950-65,^[3] later being appointed as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Leeds,^[4] here he supervised the PhD thesis of Raimond Gaita.^[5]

From 1981-2 he served as President of the Aristotelian Society,^[6] and also as President of the Mind Association.^[3]

Holland edited the book series Studies in Philosophical Psychology.^[7]

Miracles

In philosophy the word miracle usually refers to an event caused by God or one that cannot happen within the laws of nature.^[8] While this view is accepted by philosophers such as David Hume, Holland argued in his article The Miraculous that this definition is inadequate because it is too restrictive. Holland argues that a miracle is when an event contrary to usual experience occurs, and this occurrence has such human significance that it is interpreted to be miraculous. This means that a miracle can be deemed one even if there is a known natural explanation.^[9]

Holland gives an example of a boy playing with a toy motor-car on a railway crossing. A wheel of the toy gets stuck in the tracks, and a train is approaching from a curve, making it impossible for the driver to see the boy and stop before hitting him. The boy's mother sees him from their house, and hears the train approaching, but is too far away to do anything. Nevertheless, the train's brakes apply and it stops just before hitting the boy. Having seen this, the mother believes it to be a miracle, however the brakes had applied automatically because the driver passed out from circumstances unrelated to seeing the boy on the crossing. While this event has a natural explanation, the mother will continue to believe it was a miracle.^[9][10]

Bibliography

• Religious Discourse and Theological Discourse (1956) in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 147–163.
• Modern Philosophers Consider Religion: A Reply (1958) in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 208–209.
• The Miraculous (1965) in American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan., 1965), pp. 43-51.
• Not Bending the Knee (1990) in Philosophical Investigations Vol. 13 No. 1., pp. 18-30.
• Fanciful Fates (1997) in Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 20 No. 3., pp. 246–256.