Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Rants and Incendiary Tracts
1989 anthology volume From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
Rants and Incendiary Tracts: Voices of Desperate Illumination 1558–Present is an anthology book of rants edited by Bob Black and Adam Parfrey. The book does not attempt to explain what a rant is. Black was an anarchist, the author of The Abolition of Work, while Parfrey was a publisher. It was co-published by Parfrey's Amok Press and Loompanics Unlimited in 1989. The original co-editor was Hakim Bey, another anarchist, who quit the project.
Folowing a prelude and a foreword from Parfrey and Black, respectively, the book is a collection of 56 rants from a variety of sources, arranged in chronological order from the first entry, dated 1558, to the final entry in 1988. The rants are either full texts or excerpts of longer texts. Writers of the rants range from left-wing and anarchist activists, to far-right writers, dictators, attempted murders and serial killers. The book received praise from reviewers, particularly for the perceived entertainment value and the diversity of ideologies of the rants. Several noted its content as offensive or immoral.
Remove ads
Background and publication history
Summarize
Perspective
The book was edited by the anarchist Bob Black and the counterculture publisher Adam Parfrey.[1][2] Parfrey was then the co-founder of Amok Press, a publisher known for its publication of strange and taboo books.[3][4] Parfrey was the editor of a similar volume, Apocalypse Culture, published by Amok in 1987, while Black had previously authored the 1985 book The Abolition of Work.[5]
In compiling the book Parfrey asked for quotes from the neo-Nazis Joseph Tommasi and George Lincoln Rockwell from James Mason for their inclusion in the book. For unclear reasons these quotes were ultimately not included in the final product.[6] The original co-editor was Hakim Bey, another anarchist.[4][7] He quit the project, disliking what he called Parfrey's "strangely reactionary mind-set" and accusing Parfrey's circle of a cultic interest in Charles Manson, murder, and Nazism.[4][7] His denunciation is included as a rant in the book.[7]
Prior to its publication, Amok Press as a publisher was having troubles, with an uncertain future.[3] Rants and Incendiary Tracts was co-published by Amok Press and Loompanics Unlimited in 1989, in New York.[1][8] Its first edition was 219 pages long;[5] the cover features an unidentified man screaming.[4] It was the final Amok Press book before the publisher split.[9] By 1994, Black had denounced his co-editor Parfrey as "a pissant hustler, a liar, and a thief".[6]
Remove ads
Contents
Summarize
Perspective
Rants is an anthology book of "rants", with chapters sourced from numerous sources by different authors.[2] At no point does the book attempt to explain what a rant is.[8][10] Parfrey gives a prelude on the importance of rants, arguing that "to hold an opinion and dare to express it is the final prerogative of the free man", and that in contemporary times no one spoke their mind.[5] Following this is a foreword from Black that expands on the meaning and consequences of these "rants"; Black defines ranters as those who "care so much that they don't care if nobody else cares".[11]
The book includes 56 rants in total;[4] the rants included in the book are either full texts or excerpts of longer texts. The rants are arranged in chronological order from the first entry, an excerpt from The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstruous Regiment of Women by John Knox from 1558, to Hakim Bey's rant against the book itself as "Intellectual S & M is the Fascism of the 80s" in 1988.[4][10][11] Each entry has an explanation giving it context.[12]
Inclusions range from the well-known to the obscure.[8][10][11] Most of the inclusions are men, with only three women writers; it also largely focused on the United States.[11] The book includes writers of a variety of ideologies;[4] rants from many left-wing and anarchist writers like Bey, Wilhelm Reich, Louis Lingg, and Emmett Grogan.[6] It also includes the works of a few far-right writers like Kurt Saxon, Ezra Pound, and Ragnar Redbeard.[6] Other people whose writings are included are Valerie Solanas's SCUM Manifesto, who attempted to assassinate Andy Warhol,[1] Iranian dictator Ruhollah Khomeini,[1][13] Marquis de Sade,[5] and the serial killer Carl Panzram.[8]
Remove ads
Reception
Summarize
Perspective
The book received largely positive reviews, particularly for its perceived entertainment value.[1][5][8] Ellen Datlow and Terri Windling listed it in their 1990 book The Year's Best Fantasy and Horror: Third Annual Collection, describing it as "great stuff from the people who brought you Apocalypse Culture".[1] The Utne Reader's Ray Mungo praised the book, saying the editors had "dug up some of the most alarming, delightful, distinguished, amusing, and offensive writings in history".[5] Journalist Harry Allen, writing for The Village Voice, praised the book, calling it a "winner" for its collection of both content with "literary value" and "claptrap", a "collection of half baked and burnt ideas".[13] Paul Oldfield for Melody Maker called the book alluring, coming at a time "when nobody has convictions", with much content that was offensive and absurd.[4] The periodical Factsheet Five was more mixed, calling it "more of a freak show than anything else". They further called it "an anthology [...] of texts that would perhaps be better forgotten", at least by those with morals; they called it "some of the most amoral (not to mention spiteful) invective ever produced".[10]
Bill Blank from Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed described it as "a wild graveyard party with laughs and severed heads for everyone", and praised its collection of a variety of ideologies.[11] Factsheet Five found its overriding theme to be that of an opposition to mainstream society.[10] Steve Beaumont for the magazine Maximum Rocknroll praised the book for having shocking and interesting contents "with something for everybody"; he called the entry by the serial killer Carl Panzram particularly horrifying, and praised the diversity of ideas included. Beaumont argued the book should have provided some guidance on what constitues a "rant" or what about them was worth paying attention to, though said this was ultimately only a minor issue, as "Rants holds no pretentions [sic] of being an academic publication" so should "not have to answer to questions of content and worth".[8] Oldfield argued Stanisław Szukalski's contribution was the most bizarre, saying it made the pseudoscience writer Erich von Däniken seem the scientific establishment.[4] Some reviewers praised the more obscure inclusions.[8][10]
Beaumont argued that "the common theme which binds the fifty seven pieces in Rants together is the fact that each and every one is written with the kind of passion that most writers just dream about" with "a new philosophy, a new ideology, and a new form of extremism".[8] Allen wrote that its contents ranged from entertaining to "hellish goop".[13] Blank said the book successfully showed that "acerbic writing" was "a fascinating yet neglected form of communication".[11] However, he criticized its lack of women ranters, and found the whole thing to be "a bit cold and detached" in intention.[11] Factsheet Five found some of its exclusions strange, though praised its introduction.[10]
Remove ads
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads

