Scope (logic)
Range of application for a quantifier or connective in a logical formula From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In logic, the scope of a quantifier or connective is the shortest formula in which it occurs,[1] determining the range in the formula to which the quantifier or connective is applied.[2][3][4] The notions of a free variable and bound variable are defined in terms of whether that formula is within the scope of a quantifier,[2][5] and the notions of a dominant connective and subordinate connective are defined in terms of whether a connective includes another within its scope.[6][7]
Connectives
Summarize
Perspective
The scope of a logical connective occurring within a formula is the smallest well-formed formula that contains the connective in question.[2][6][8] The connective with the largest scope in a formula is called its dominant connective,[9][10] main connective,[6][8][7] main operator,[2] major connective,[4] or principal connective;[4] a connective within the scope of another connective is said to be subordinate to it.[6]
For instance, in the formula , the dominant connective is ↔, and all other connectives are subordinate to it; the → is subordinate to the ∨, but not to the ∧; the first ¬ is also subordinate to the ∨, but not to the →; the second ¬ is subordinate to the ∧, but not to the ∨ or the →; and the third ¬ is subordinate to the second ¬, as well as to the ∧, but not to the ∨ or the →.[6] If an order of precedence is adopted for the connectives, viz., with ¬ applying first, then ∧ and ∨, then →, and finally ↔, this formula may be written in the less parenthesized form , which some may find easier to read.[6]
Quantifiers
Summarize
Perspective
The scope of a quantifier is the part of a logical expression over which the quantifier exerts control.[3] It is the shortest full sentence[5] written right after the quantifier,[3][5] often in parentheses;[3] some authors[11] describe this as including the variable written right after the universal or existential quantifier. In the formula ∀xP, for example, P[5] (or xP)[11] is the scope of the quantifier ∀x[5] (or ∀).[11]
This gives rise to the following definitions:[a]
- An occurrence of a quantifier or , immediately followed by an occurrence of the variable , as in or , is said to be -binding.[1][5]
- An occurrence of a variable in a formula is free in if, and only if, it is not in the scope of any -binding quantifier in ; otherwise it is bound in .[1][5]
- A closed formula is one in which no variable occurs free; a formula which is not closed is open.[12][1]
- An occurrence of a quantifier or is vacuous if, and only if, its scope is or , and the variable does not occur free in .[1]
- A variable is free for a variable if, and only if, no free occurrences of lie within the scope of a quantification on .[12]
- A quantifier whose scope contains another quantifier is said to have wider scope than the second, which, in turn, is said to have narrower scope than the first.[13]
See also
Notes
- These definitions follow the common practice of using Greek letters as metalogical symbols which may stand for symbols in a formal language for propositional or predicate logic. In particular, and are used to stand for any formulae whatsoever, whereas and are used to stand for propositional variables.[1]
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.