Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Serb uprising of 1848–1849

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Serb uprising of 1848–1849
Remove ads

The Serb uprising of 1848–1849, also known as the Serb revolution of 1848–1849 and Serb People's Movement of 1848–1849, took place in what is today Vojvodina, Serbia, and was part of the Revolutions of 1848 in the Austrian Empire. During the Hungarian Revolution, Hungarians achieved significant military successes, but were defeated after Russian intervention. Serbs led fierce battles against the Hungarians for autonomy or merge with the help of volunteers from the Principality of Serbia. The outcome of the uprising was the establishment of Serbian Vojvodina (then Voivodeship of Serbia and Banat of Temeschwar), a special autonomous region under the Austrian crown. However, the Voivodeship failed certain expectations that Serbian patriots had expressed at the May Assembly (1848). Serbs did not constitute an absolute majority of the population, while the administration was largely in the hands of German officials and officers. The Voivodeship was abolished in 1860, however, some rights were kept by the Serb community. The Serbian Patriarchate was renewed, while the uprising had increased national awareness of the Serb people north of the Sava and Danube in the struggle for freedom.

Quick facts Date, Location ...
Remove ads

Background

Summarize
Perspective

The autocratic methods of conservative chancellor Metternich turned the Austrian Empire into a police state. It systematically suppressed any open-minded movement that would in some way undermine the blessed order. The Austrian Empire, made up of various nationalities, was a remnant of the old political conjuncture, and found it difficult getting used to the new political landscape. In the 16th century there were still various small nations and states connected to Austria, which allowed the larger community to better successfully resist the Ottoman threat. However, after the suppression of the Ottomans, the need for a centralized state disappeared. In its place, the awakening of national consciousness from the beginning of the 19th century, the Austrian community had increasingly aspired to enter into the framework of national states. The Italians, until then scattered, began to work on their national unification; the same movement occurred in the Germans. In both nations, the realization of these plans could be achieved only at the expense of the estates of the Austrian Empire and the prestige of the Habsburg dynasty. Even then, in the mid-19th century, there were many worries in Vienna that a free Serbian state in the Balkans could become an attractive point for its South Slavic subjects. The whole movement to strengthen mutual Slavic bonds, dubbed Pan-Slavism, was viewed with much suspicion as a pure political action under the leadership of Russia and with a view that it would ultimately serve her. The nationalist activity of Hungarians, very lively and impulsive in the first half of the 19th century, gradually received the character of a national struggle for full independence from Vienna. There was fighting on all sides. Metternich was aware of this, and, as his only means for maintaining the state, he clamped down on the rebels. He did not manage to do anything notable to channel the currents with the previous measures, nor was he able to rely on the part of the population that sincerely sought change in the system, but which had not yet come out of the frame of the state union.[1]

In February 1848, the revolution broke out in Paris, destroying the monarchy and leading to the proclamation of the republic in France. This rocked the foundations of the crumbling Austrian empire, leading to uprisings throughout its territories. German patriots gathered in Frankfurt in an All-German Parliament, which clearly expressed its desire for German unification, but not under the leadership of Austria. As a response, the All-Slavic meeting in Prague followed, in which several Serbs participated. Simultaneously to these political manifestation, fights began on the street. There were even alarms in loyal imperial Vienna. Metternich needed to be sacrificed, but it did not calm the boiling spirits, especially not where the movement got not only the character of the struggle for constitutional freedoms, but also for national liberation.[2]

Remove ads

Prelude

Summarize
Perspective

The Hungarians became the most dangerous in Austria, led by the temperamented orator Lajos Kossuth. In their nationalism, the Hungarians never had enough measures. On the area of the Crown of St. Stephen they were a constant minority in relation to the other nationalities, however, their state was represented and led by only them. Fearing that they would lose that supremacy or have to share it, they began efforts by all means to preserve a Hungarian character to the state. In this pursuit they were necessary to come into conflict with other nationalities, primarily with the Serbs and Croats. The Serbs had their privileges with a kind of religious autonomy, which the Hungarians had long looked down upon, and which was in danger of one day being abolished. Croats had also kept their historical rights and especially their language, which use was narrowed by organization of the Hungarians. The Viennese government had often used the Serbs and Croats, whose militancy was well known, as its instrument to curb Hungary's desires. This created an even larger gap between them and the Hungarians, because along with opposition from the Hungarians, it came in a moment of absolute disbelief.[3]

When the news came of the riots in Paris followed by those in Vienna, and when it became clear what the Hungarians sought, the Serbs and Croats immediately raised their voices. Zagreb had become very active under the leadership of Ban Josip Jelačić, a Frontier colonel, who almost from the beginning gave his movement a combative character, but at the same time showed affection towards the Habsburg dynasty. The Frontiersmen, the best soldiers in the Austrian army, were at this time more loyal to the Austrian court than many German regiments. In this spirit of loyalty and impeccable performance of service, the Frontiersmen (Serbs and Croats alike) were mannered for centuries. A popular song went When the Holy Emperor desires, the Frontiersman jumps into death!.[4]

As part of the Revolutions of 1848, the Serbs under Austria-Hungary demanded what they had in the previous century; recognition of Serbian as official language, equality of the Orthodox church as with Catholics, and annual church assembly gatherings.[5] They met at Sremski Karlovci and Novi Sad.[5]

Remove ads

May Assembly

Thumb
May Assembly, by Pavle Simić (1818–1876).
Thumb
Serbian patriarch Josif Rajačić is giving a blessing to the army of Serbian Vojvodina in 1848.

Several thousand Serbs met at the May Assembly in Sremski Karlovci on 1 May 1848.[5] The delegates chose Šupljikac as voivode, the civil and military commander.[5] Josif Rajačić was elected the patriarch of the Serbs.[5] The Serbs demanded a national unit consisting of Banat, Bačka, Baranja and part of Srem, known collectively as Vojvodina.[5]

Uprising

During the revolutions, there was much fighting in Vojvodina, in June, Hungarian and Serbian bands began fighting.[5] General Stratimirović, head of the main committee, on 10 May, urged Prince Aleksandar for assistance and asked Stevan Knićanin, a commissioner, to intercede. Knićanin was elected military commander. In June and July a large wave of volunteers from the Principality entered Vojvodina, Knićanin arrived at 25 July. The new emperor Franz Joseph approved the appointments of Šupljikac and Rajačić.[5] Šupljikac became the supreme military commander of the Serbian national troops on 6 October.

Remove ads

Military events

Summarize
Perspective

The first phase of the confrontations in the summer of 1848

In the spring of 1848, the assemblies of the Serbs held in Pest and Újvidék (Novi Sad) demanded recognition of Serbs as a nation and abolition of feudalism in the Military Frontier. When the envoys of the Serbs appeared in Pozsony, Kossuth informed them that they could not be recognized as an independent nation. This was because the new Liberal concept of a nation brought by the revolution was that in Hungary only one political nation could exist, and that was the Hungarian nation. The term 'Hungarian nation' referred to all the people of different languages living in Hungary.[6] Kossuth and the Hungarian politicians knew that accepting political nations other than the Hungarian within the country would lead to the separation of those nations from Hungary. This would result in the dismemberment of the country.[7]

Thumb
The military situation in Hungary between 12.06.1848-29.09.1848

On 13–15 May 1848, the Serb National Assembly in Karlóca established the Serb Main Committee (also known as the "Main Odbor"), followed by the formation of various districts and local committees in late May and early June.[8] The Orthodox Archbishop Josif Rajačić was initially elected as the chairman of the Main Odbor, but later resigned and was replaced by Đorđe Stratimirović, who had previously served as an officer in the K.u.K. army and had the necessary skills to organize an armed force.[8] The Assembly in Karlóca called upon the Serb population to take up arms.[9] Rajačić traveled to Zagreb in early June, where he formed an alliance against the Hungarians with the leader of the Croatian movement, Josip Jelačić.[8]

The situation in the southern region was worsened by the arrival of several thousand volunteers, from the Principality of Serbia, who intended to assist their fellow connationals.[10] Their involvement played a crucial role in the outcome of the Karlóca national assembly and in the intense fighting that began in mid–June, which often degenerated into gruesome massacres against the civilians.[10]

At the end of May, the Main Odbor repeatedly called for an armed uprising of the Serb population in the south, and in early June asked also the border guard regiments to join the uprising.[11] On 8 June, the Hungarian government ordered Lieutenant-General János Hrabovszky, the commander-in-chief of the Slavonia and Syrmia (Szerémség) regions, to put an end to the increasingly dangerous movement of the Serbs and even disperse by force of arms the Main Odbor from Karlóca.[11] On 12 June, Hrabovsky and his troops attacked the town.[12] The Battle of Karlóca that started, was the first clash of the Hungarian War of Independence.[12] At first, the Hungarian attack was successful, but the Serbs received reinforcements from other settlements, and fearing an encirclement, Hrabovszky retreated.[13] This success further inflamed the Serb insurrection.[14]

The Serb border guards started to set up fortified camps, from which they attacked the German, Romanian, and Hungarian settlements of Bácska and Bánság (Banat), expelling, conquering and even massacring some of their population.[10] The leaders, mostly of foreign origin, of the K.u.K. army subordinated to the Hungarian government, did not make much effort to put down this uprising.[10] Peace negotiation attempts began almost at the same time as the outbreak of armed hostilities.[10] The first to make contact with the leaders of the Serb insurgents was royal commissioner Péter Chernovits (of Serb origin), but the ceasefire concluded on 24 June was used by the Serbs to gather more forces, thus the fight continued shortly afterward.[15]

In the fights during July and August, despite some Hungarian victories (the battles of Versec, Écska, Futak, Fehértemplom), due to the obstruction of the defense by the majority of the Austrian officers, the incompetence or lack of determination of the Hungarian commanders, the Serbs took over most of the Southern Banat and Southern Bácska regions, being greeted by a part of the Serb population, and forcing those who were reluctant with promises or threats to join.[16] Between the second part of July and the first half of August, the Hungarians lost one after other important localities as Bácsföldvár, Pancsova, Uzdin, Kovacsica, Padina, Jarkovác, Margitica, Tomasevác, Neuzina, Szárcsa, Szécsány, Ernesztháza, Bóka,[17] the only town which withstood the Serb attacks was Fehértemplom, which repelled two Serb attacks on 19 and 30 August.[18]

Despite the apparently neutral stance of the Habsburg government, Ferdinand Mayerhofer von Grünbühel, the Austrian consul in Belgrade, was one of the main supporters of the anti-Hungarian efforts of the Serbs and the participation of Serbian volunteers in the fighting. The Belgrade consul first played a major role in encouraging the volunteers who came from the Principality of Serbia to come to Hungary to fight the Hungarians and then sought to promote an alliance between the Serbs and Croatian Ban Josip Jelačić.[19] Later, during the winter months, he took over the command of the joint Austrian–Serb corps, and led it against the Hungarian units.[20]

The first notable Hungarian success of the war in the south was the capture of the Serb fortified camp from Perlasz on 2 September.[21] The Hungarians, however, did not take advantage of the success, and the start of the Croatian campaign in Transdanubia starting on 11 September caused the Hungarian troops to retreat to defensive positions.[22]

The most important Serb fortified camp established in Bácska, Szenttamás, was located on the banks of the Franz Canal.[23] Taking advantage of the natural conditions, by the end of June 1848, the Serbs had established a substantial system of entrenchments around the settlement.[23] The soldiers of the Titel Šajkaši battalion equipped the entrenchments with three-pounder cannons.[23] The First Siege of Szenttamás took place on 14 July 1848 but the Hungarian attack was repulsed.[24] The Hungarians repeated the attack on 19 August, but the Serbs again repulsed the attack.[25] On 21 September, the Minister of War, General Lázár Mészáros, attempted the to take Szenttamás again, but this siege also failed.[26]

It is worth noting that some talented Hungarian generals stood out during the fighting, which had been going on since the summer. They later gained great fame in the main theatre of war, like János Damjanich[27] or Károly Leiningen-Westerburg.[28] Military units were also formed here that would later gain legendary fame, such as the 3rd (White-Feathered)[29] and 9th (Red-capped)[30] Honvéd Battalions.

Remove ads

Battles

  • Battle of Pančevo (2 January 1849), Serbian victory
  • Battle of Vršac (January 1849), Serbian victory
  • Battle of Sombor (1849), Hungarian victory
  • Battle of Sirig (1849), Hungarian victory
  • Battle of Horgoš (1849), Hungarian victory
  • Battle of Srbobran (3 April 1849), Hungarian victory
  • Battles for Šajkaška (1849)
    • Mošorin and Vilovo (12 April), Serbian victory
    • Kać and Budisav (6 May), Serbian victory
    • Vilovo, Titel and Mošorin (22–26 May), Serbian victory
    • Vilovo and Mošorin (1 May), Serbian victory
  • Bombing of Novi Sad (12 June)
Remove ads

References

Sources and further reading

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads