Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Small object argument
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
In mathematics, especially in category theory, Quillen’s small object argument, when applicable, constructs a factorization of a morphism in a functorial way. In practice, it can be used to show some class of morphisms constitutes a weak factorization system in the theory of model categories.
The argument was introduced by Quillen to construct a model structure on the category of (reasonable) topological spaces.[1] The original argument was later refined by Garner.[2]
Remove ads
Statement
Let be a category that has all small colimits. We say an object in it is compact with respect to an ordinal if commutes with an -filterted colimit. In practice, we fix and simply say an object is compact if it is so with respect to that fixed .
If is a class of morphismms, we write for the class of morphisms that satisfy the left lifting property with respect to . Similarly, we write for the right lifting property. Then
Remove ads
Example: presheaf
Here is a simple example of how the argument works in the case of the category of presheaves on some small category.[5]
Let denote the set of monomorphisms of the form , a quotient of a representable presheaf. Then can be shown to be equal to the class of monomorphisms. Then the small object argument says: each presheaf morphism can be factored as where is a monomorphism and in ; i.e., is a morphism having the right lifting property with respect to monomorphisms.
Remove ads
Proof
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (March 2025) |
For now, see.[6] But roughly the construction is a sort of successive approximation.
See also
References
Further reading
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads