Launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes of payload into low earth orbit From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A super heavy-lift launch vehicle is a rocket that can lift to low Earth orbit a "super heavy payload", which is defined as more than 50 metric tons (110,000 lb)[1][2] by the United States and as more than 100 metric tons (220,000 lb) by Russia.[3] It is the most capable launch vehicle classification by mass to orbit, exceeding that of the heavy-lift launch vehicle classification.
![]() Super heavy-lift launch vehicles, to scale | |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Super heavy-lift launch vehicle |
Preceded by | Heavy-lift launch vehicle |
Built | Since 1967 |
General characteristics | |
Capacity |
|
Only 14 such payloads were successfully launched before 2022: 12 as part of the Apollo program before 1972 and two Energia launches, in 1987 and 1988. Most planned crewed lunar and interplanetary missions depend on these launch vehicles.
Several super heavy-lift launch vehicle concepts were produced in the 1960s,[4] including the Sea Dragon. During the Space Race, the Saturn V and N1 were built by the United States and Soviet Union, respectively. After the Saturn V's successful Apollo program and the N1's failures, the Soviets' Energia launched twice in the 1980s, once bearing the Buran spaceplane. The next two decades saw multiple concepts drawn out once again, most notably Space Shuttle-derived vehicles and Rus-M, but none were built. In the 2010s, super heavy-lift launch vehicles received interest once again, leading to the launch of the Falcon Heavy, the Space Launch System, and Starship, and the beginning of development of the Long March and Yenisei rockets.
Rocket | Configuration | Organization | Nationality | Liftoff thrust | Mass to LEO | Maiden successful flight | Heaviest known launch | Status | Reusable | Launches (success / total) |
Cost per launch (adjusted for inflation) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
...to LEO or MEO | ...to GTO or GSO | ...to HEO and beyond | |||||||||||
Saturn V | Apollo/Skylab | NASA | ![]() |
34.5 MN (7,750,000 lbf) | 140 t (310,000 lb)A | 1967 | 76,540 kg (168,740 lb)[30] | — | 45,200 kg (99,600 lb) | Retired (1973) | No | 12G / 13 | US$1.45 billion (in 2023) |
N1 | OKB-1 | ![]() |
45.4 MN (10,200,000 lbf) | 95 t (209,000 lb) | None | — | — | — | Cancelled (1974) | No | 0 / 4 | US$1.71 billion (in 2023) | |
Energia | NPO Energia | 34.8 MN (7,800,000 lbf) | 100 t (220,000 lb)B | 1987B | 80,000 kg (180,000 lb)[31] | — | — | Retired (1988) |
No | 2 / 2 | US$2.16 billion (in 2023) | ||
Falcon Heavy | Recoverable Side Boosters | SpaceX | ![]() |
22.8 MN (5,100,000 lbf) | 57 t (126,000 lb)[10] | 2022 | — | 9,200 kg (20,300 lb)[32] | 2,608 kg (5,750 lb) | Operational | PartiallyC | 6 / 6F | US$101 million (in 2023) |
Expended | 63.8 t (141,000 lb)[33] | 2023 | — | 6,722 kg (14,819 lb) | 6,065 kg (13,371 lb) | Operational | No | 2 / 2F | US$186 million (in 2023) | ||||
SLS | Block 1 | NASA | 39.1 MN (8,800,000 lbf) | 95 t (209,000 lb)[34]D | 2022 | — | — | 26,520 kg (58,470 lb) | Operational | No | 1 / 1 | US$2.5 billion (in 2023) | |
Block 1B | 39.6 MN (8,900,000 lbf) | 105 t (231,000 lb)[35] | Planned (2028) | — | — | — | Under development | No | — | ? | |||
Block 2 | 42.3 MN (9,500,000 lbf) | 130 t (290,000 lb)[36] | Planned (2034) | — | — | — | Under development | No | — | ? | |||
Starship | Block 1 | SpaceX | 73.5 MN (16,500,000 lbf)[37] | 50–100 t (110,000–220,000 lb)[38][39]E | 2024 | — | — | — | Retired (2024) |
PartiallyJ | 4 / 6 | Projected US$<90 million (2024)[40]I | |
Block 2 | 80.8 MN (18,200,000 lbf)[41] | 100–150 t (220,000–330,000 lb)[39]E | Planned (2025) | — | — | — | Under development | Planned (fully) | 0 / 1 | Projected US$<10 million (2024)[40]I | |||
Block 3 | 98 MN (22,000,000 lbf)[42] | 200 t (440,000 lb)[43]E | TBA | — | — | — | Under development | Planned (fully) | — | Projected US$<6 million (2024)[43] | |||
Long March 10 | CALT | ![]() |
26.25 MN (5,900,000 lbf) | 70 t (150,000 lb)[44] | Planned (2027) | — | — | — | Under development | No | — | ? | |
Long March 9 | 60 MN (13,000,000 lbf) | 150 t (330,000 lb)[45] | Planned (2033) | — | — | — | Under development | Planned (partially) | — | ? | |||
Yenisei | Yenisei | Progress | ![]() |
43.5 MN (9,800,000 lbf) | 103 t (227,000 lb) | TBA | — | — | — | Under development | No | — | ? |
Don | 130 t (290,000 lb) | TBA | — | — | — | Under development | No | — | ? |
^A Includes mass of Apollo command and service modules, Apollo Lunar Module, Spacecraft/LM Adapter, Saturn V Instrument Unit, S-IVB stage, and propellant for translunar injection; payload mass to LEO is about 122.4 t (270,000 lb).[46]
^B Required upper stage or payload to perform final orbital insertion.
^C Side booster cores recoverable, center core intentionally expended. First re-use of the side boosters was demonstrated in 2019 when the ones used on the Arabsat-6A launch were reused on the STP-2 launch.
^D Includes mass of Orion spacecraft, European Service Module, Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage, and propellant for translunar injection.
^E Does not include dry mass of spaceship.
^F Falcon Heavy has launched 11 times since 2018, but first three times did not qualify as a "super heavy" because recovery of the center core was attempted.
^G Apollo 6 was a "partial failure": It reached orbit, but had problems with the second and third stages.
^I Estimate by third party.
^J Engines reusable, booster reuse unproven.[47]
Long March 10 was first proposed in 2018 as a concept for the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program.[48] Long March 9, an over 150 t (330,000 lb) to LEO capable rocket was proposed in 2018[49] by China, with plans to launch the rocket by 2028. The length of the Long March-9 will exceed 114 meters, and the rocket would have a core stage with a diameter of 10 meters. Long March 9 is expected to carry a payload of over 150 tonnes into low-Earth orbit, with a capacity of over 50 tonnes for Earth-Moon transfer orbit.[50][51] Development was approved in 2021.[52]
Yenisei,[53] a super heavy-lift launch vehicle using existing components instead of pushing the less-powerful Angara A5V project, was proposed by Russia's RSC Energia in August 2016.[54]
A revival of the Energia booster was proposed in 2016, also to avoid pushing the Angara project.[55] If developed, this vehicle could allow Russia to launch missions towards establishing a permanent Moon base with simpler logistics, launching just one or two 80-to-160-tonne super-heavy rockets instead of four 40-tonne Angara A5Vs implying quick-sequence launches and multiple in-orbit rendezvous. In February 2018, the КРК СТК (space rocket complex of the super-heavy class) design was updated to lift at least 90 tonnes to LEO and 20 tonnes to lunar polar orbit, and to be launched from Vostochny Cosmodrome.[56] The first flight is scheduled for 2028, with Moon landings starting in 2030.[57] It looks like this proposal has been at least paused.[58]
Blue Origin has plans for a project following their New Glenn rocket, termed New Armstrong, which some media sources have speculated will be a larger launch vehicle.[59]
Numerous super-heavy-lift vehicles have been proposed and received various levels of development prior to their cancellation.
As part of the Soviet crewed lunar project to compete with Apollo/Saturn V, the N1 rocket was secretly designed with a payload capacity of 95 t (209,000 lb). Four test vehicles were launched from 1969 to 1972, but all failed shortly after lift-off.[60] The program was suspended in May 1974 and formally cancelled in March 1976.[61][62] The Soviet UR-700 rocket design concept competed against the N1, but was never developed. In the concept, it was to have had a payload capacity of up to 151 t (333,000 lb)[63] to low earth orbit.
During project Aelita (1969–1972), the Soviets were developing a way to beat the Americans to Mars. They designed the UR-700A, a nuclear powered variant of the UR-700, and UR-700M, a LOx/Kerosene variant to assemble the 1,400 t (3,100,000 lb) MK-700 spacecraft in earth orbit in two launches. The UR-700M would have a payload capacity of 750 t (1,650,000 lb).[64] The only Universal Rocket to make it past the design phase was the UR-500 while the N1 was selected to be the Soviets' HLV for lunar and Martian missions.[65]
The UR-900, proposed in 1969, would have had a payload capacity of 240 t (530,000 lb) to low earth orbit. It never left the drawing board.[66]
The General Dynamics Nexus was proposed in the 1960s as a fully reusable successor to the Saturn V rocket, having the capacity of transporting up to 450–910 t (990,000–2,000,000 lb) to orbit.[67][68]
The American Saturn MLV family of rockets was proposed in 1965 by NASA as successors to the Saturn V rocket.[69] It would have been able to carry up to 160,880 kg (354,680 lb) to low Earth orbit. The Nova designs were also studied by NASA before the agency chose the Saturn V in the early 1960s[70] Nova was cancelled in 1964 and had reusable variants.[71]
Based on the recommendations of the Stafford Synthesis report, First Lunar Outpost (FLO) would have relied on a massive Saturn-derived launch vehicle known as the Comet HLLV. The Comet would have been capable of injecting 230.8 t (508,800 lb) into low earth orbit and 88.5 t (195,200 lb) on a TLI making it one of the most capable vehicles ever designed.[72] FLO was cancelled during the design process along with the rest of the Space Exploration Initiative.[citation needed]
The U.S. Ares V for the Constellation program was intended to reuse many elements of the Space Shuttle program, both on the ground and flight hardware, to save costs. The Ares V was designed to carry 188 t (414,000 lb) and was cancelled in 2010.[73]
The Shuttle-Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle ("HLV") was an alternate super heavy-lift launch vehicle proposal for the NASA Constellation program, proposed in 2009.[74]
A 1962 design proposal, Sea Dragon, called for an enormous 150 m (490 ft) tall, sea-launched rocket capable of lifting 550 t (1,210,000 lb) to low Earth orbit. Although preliminary engineering of the design was done by TRW, the project never moved forward due to the closing of NASA's Future Projects Branch.[75][76]
The Rus-M was a proposed Russian family of launchers whose development began in 2009. It would have had two super heavy variants: one able to lift 50–60 tons, and another able to lift 130–150 tons.[77]
SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System was a 12 m (39 ft) diameter launch vehicle concept unveiled in 2016. The payload capability was to be 550 t (1,210,000 lb) in an expendable configuration or 300 t (660,000 lb) in a reusable configuration.[78] In 2017, the 12 m evolved into a 9 m (30 ft) diameter concept Big Falcon Rocket, which became the SpaceX Starship.[79]
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.