Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

The Canterville Ghost

1887 short story by Oscar Wilde From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Canterville Ghost
Remove ads

"The Canterville Ghost" is a humorous short story by Oscar Wilde. It was the first of Wilde's stories to be published, appearing in two parts as "The Canterville Ghost – A Hylo-Idealistic Romance: The Redemptive Heroine"[1] in The Court and Society Review, 3 February and 2 March 1887.[2] It later appeared in the short story collection Lord Arthur Savile's Crime and Other Stories alongside "The Model Millionaire" and "The Sphinx Without a Secret", published in July 1891. The story is about an American family who moved to a castle haunted by the ghost of a dead English nobleman, who killed his wife and was then walled in and starved to death by his wife's brothers. It has been adapted for the stage and screen several times.

Quick facts Country, Language ...
Remove ads

Summary

Summarize
Perspective

The American Minister to the Court of St James's, Hiram B. Otis, and his family move into Canterville Castle, an English country house, despite warnings from Lord Canterville that the house is haunted. Mr. Otis says that he will take the furniture as well as the ghost at valuation.

The Otis family includes Mr. and Mrs. Otis, their eldest son Washington, their daughter Virginia and the Otis twins. At first, none of the Otis family believes in ghosts but shortly after they move in, none of them can deny the presence of Sir Simon de Canterville. Mrs. Otis notices a mysterious bloodstain on the floor and comments that "She does not at all care for bloodstains in the living room", Mrs. Umney, the housekeeper, tells her that the bloodstain is evidence of the ghost and cannot be removed. Washington Otis, the eldest son, suggests that the stain will be removed with Pinkerton's Champion Stain Remover and Paragon Detergent. When the ghost makes his first appearance, Mr. Otis promptly gets out of bed and pragmatically offers the ghost Tammany Rising Sun Lubricator to oil his chains. Angrily, the ghost throws the bottle and runs into the corridor.

The Otis twins throw pillows on him and the ghost flees. The Otis family witnesses reappearing bloodstains on the floor just by the fireplace, which are removed every time they appear in various colours. Despite the ghost's efforts and most gruesome guises, the family refuses to be frightened, leaving Sir Simon feeling increasingly helpless and humiliated. The Otises remain unconcerned. The ghost falls victim to tripwires, toy peashooters, butter slides and falling buckets of water. The mischievous twins rig up their own "ghost", which frightens him. Sir Simon sees that Virginia, the beautiful and wise fifteen-year-old daughter, is different from the rest of the family. He tells her that he has not slept in three hundred years and wants desperately to do so. The ghost tells her the tragic tale of his wife, Lady Eleanor de Canterville. Virginia listens to him and learns an important lesson, as well as the true meaning behind a riddle. Sir Simon de Canterville says that she must weep for him, for he has no tears; she must pray for him, for he has no faith and then she must accompany him to the Angel of Death and beg for Sir Simon's death. She does weep for him and pray for him and she disappears with Sir Simon through the wainscoting and accompanies him to the Garden of Death and bids the ghost farewell. The story ends with Virginia marrying the Duke of Cheshire after they both come of age. Sir Simon, she tells her husband several years later, helped her understand what life is, what death signifies and why love is stronger than both.

Remove ads

Criticism

Summarize
Perspective

19th Century

A. S. Harvey praises the story in "'Lady Windermere's Fan' & the further Teaching of Oscar Wilde" for The Ludgate Monthly, 1892,[3] writing, "The humor of the professional funny man is a different kind of humour altogether to the quaint fun of 'The Canterville Ghost,'... It makes you scream again, when you imagined it was serious for a moment, and finishes up with the sweetest little touch of pathos imaginable" (p. 260).

William Sharp writes for The Academy in 1891[4] that "much the same kind of thing has already been far better done by Mr. Andrew Lang; but it is disfigured by some stupid vulgarisms". He criticizes Wilde's rude and stereotyping portrayal of Americans, concluding, "It is the perpetration of banalities of this kind which disgusts Englishmen as well as 'cultured Americans'. One should not judge the society of a nation by that of a parish; the company of the elect by the sinners of one's own acquaintance" (p. 194).

A critic in Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science and Art writes in 1891[5] that both "Lord Arthur Savile's Crime" and "The Canterville Ghost" have "abundance of humour, if not of novelty", and "an impression that the idea is much better than the treatment of it", due to inconsistency in tone and abrupt style changes. They state that the story is spoiled by the character of the ghost, "who is neither one thing nor the other, neither flesh nor spirit", and that the ending is "absurdly incongruous and out of place" (p. 226).

Later

Philip K. Cohen writes in "Marriages and Murders: 'Lord Arthur Savile's Crime' and 'The Canterville Ghost'", in The Moral Vision of Oscar Wilde (1978)[6] that the story shows the misery of a double life and features an "unmasking" – a common feature in Wilde's works – that reveals the suffering of the "anguished sinner", who seeks "the peace that forgiveness brings". Cohen explains the title as expressing the conflict between materialism and idealism, explaining that the Hylo-Idealisists – a small group that emerged in England in the 1870s and 1880s – stood for atheism, so the juxtaposition with the Christian elements of the story aligns with the title "when one interprets its hyphen as an indicator of opposition; Wilde continually stresses the conflict between materialism, represented by the combining form hylo-, and Christian idealism. In this philosophical romance, the idealists overcome obstacles set up by the hylists". Cohen also writes that "The Canterville Ghost" shows Wilde testing the fairy-tale genre, which he wrote more in later.

Lydia Reineck Wilburn writes in "Oscar Wilde's 'The Canterville Ghost': The Power of an Audience" (1987)[1] that the story shows Wilde grappling with questions about the function of audience, like how important the audience is an should be to an artist.

In "Oscar Wilde and the Semantic Mechanisms of Humour: The Satire of Social Habits" (1994)[7] Mariano Baselga writes that Wilde criticizes upper class sensibilities in this story, explaining, "the main targets of the ghost's troublemaking are systematically the members of the upper class and/or the people, actions, common vices and symbols associated to them. The Dowager Duchess with all the vanity of her best lace-and-diamond attire, the fussy housemaids (whom we imagine frilly, shrill-voiced and pink-faced), a priest, the greedy card-sharper Lord Canterville are the helpless victims of a ghost who is apparently trying to emulate Robin Hood in his own way."

Michèle Mendelssohn asserts that the story comments on the English and American cultures through contrasting "American pragmatism and artistocratic English superstitions", (p. 167) "science versus belief, realism versus gothic conventions, and the natural versus the supernatural", (168) and how Virginia saving the day may suggest that American men are weak and shirking their responsibilities in "Notes on Oscar Wilde's Transatlantic Gender Politics" (2012).[8]

Nick Freeman writes in "The Victorian Ghost Story" in The Victorian Gothic: An Edinburgh Companion, (2012)[9] that "by the late 1880s...the type of ghost story which had brought pleasant frissons to earlier Victorian readers had become stale and was falling victim to parodists", but that "Wilde somehow combined witty parody with an affecting friendship between the ghost of Sir Simon de Canterville and Virginia Otis" (p.100).

Jarlath Killeen writes in "Braindead: Locating the Gothic" in The Emergence of Irish Gothic Fiction: History, Origins, Theories (2014)[10] that "the Gothic is reduced to a mechanical and hammy piece of amateur theatrics needing to be put out of its misery by the virginal innocent usually terrorised within it" (p. 55) in the story.

Christopher S. Nassaar writes in "Oscar Wilde and the (Attempted) Murder of Conscience" (2014)[11] that the ghost and the twins have no conscious, but that the conscience intervenes in the form of Virginia. She saves the day, but "spoils the fun"; the first part of the story when hijinks ensue is more entertaining (p. 4).

Benjamin Morgan states that Wilde satirized the "bland commercialism" (677) Americans included as part of their national identity (p. 685) in "Oscar Wilde's Un-American Tour: Aestheticism, Mormonism, and Transnational Resonance" (2014).[12]

Kimberly Lutz cites Cohen and Wilburn in "Serious Comedy? Finding Meaning in 'The Canterville Ghost'" (2009)[13] adding that death is depicted as a "deserved rest" for "the exhausted actor". Lutz also writes that ""The Canterville Ghost" parodies actors, dandies, American materialism, aristocratic excess, ghost stories, and Gothic conventions," and describes the comic theme of "the farcical result of the American/British culture clash".

Remove ads

Adaptations

Summarize
Perspective
Thumb
The Ghost Castle (after Oscar Wilde) (Das Gespensterschloß (nach Oskar Wilde)) MET DP848994

Theatrical films

On television

According to The American Film Institute Catalog, "Among the many other adaptations of Oscar Wilde's story are the following television versions, all titled The Canterville Ghost:"[18]

In addition to the AFI list are the following:

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads