Tibble v. Edison International

Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."^[1]

Tibble v. Edison International
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 24, 2015 Decided May 18, 2015
Full case name	Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al.
Docket no.	13–550
Citations	575 U.S. 523 (more) 135 S. Ct. 1823; 191 L. Ed. 2d 795
Holding
Because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
Majority	Breyer, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.^[2]