Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Two by Twos
International Christian movement From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
"Two by Twos" (also known as 2x2, The Truth, and The Way) is an exonym used to describe an international, non-denominational Christian primativist community that takes no name other than Christian, follows the first century structure of house churches and an itinerent lay ministry, and affirms first century apostolic doctrine.[3][4] The tradition descends from interdenominational pilgrims in rural Scotland and a lay-led Renewal movement in Ireland in 1897, led by William Irvine[5] and John Long[6].[7][8][9][3][page needed] The church identifies as Christian, follows the teachings of Jesus, and bases doctrine on the New Testament.[4] The church community is present internationally, with a roughly estimated membership of 1-4 million.[10] The church is distinguished by its itinerant Ministers living in voluntary apostolic poverty, homelessness, and celibacy; its collectivist charitable community; lay participation; and its practice of meeting in members' homes.[3] The church is composed of a decentralized international network of house churches.[8][7][page needed] Members are known as "friends", meeting hosts as "elders", and the ministry as "workers" or “servants”.[7][4][page needed] The church makes no publications, no creeds, and no doctrinal statements beyond the truth of the New Testament.[4] The church practices Believer’s Baptism by immersion and weekly Communion.[7][page needed]
Remove ads
Practices
Ministers are itinerant and work in pairs, hence the exonym "Two by Twos".[8] Members hold regular twice-weekly worship gatherings in local homes on Sunday and midweek.[8] The church also holds annual regional conventions for members and public Gospel meetings.[citation needed] Believer’s baptism by immersion is practiced outdoors.[4] Emblems of bread and "the fruit of the vine" (ie wine or grape juice) are shared and personally taken at the fellowship gathering.[8][11]
Remove ads
Oral tradition
Members have a tradition of direct person-to-person oral witness when communicating on spiritual life.[4] The church does not have official headquarters or publications. It does not publish any doctrinal statements, or communicate beliefs through mass communication media (e.g. books or radio) beyond person-to-person direct communication.[4] According to Piepkorn (1972), members are reluctant to discuss their fellowship except with bonafide seekers, and other inquiries regarding beliefs are referred to the Bible.[4] Its hymnbook and various other materials for internal use are produced by outside publishers and printing firms.[12] Printed invitations for its open gospel services are the only public written materials.
Remove ads
Discrete congregation
Summarize
Perspective
The community is private and largely unknown by the outside world. Limited information is contributed to by a number of factors:
- The United Kingdom criminalized religious belief that did not confirm state church creeds and authority, which was punishable by death in England, Scotland, and Ireland until tolerance Acts in the 19th century. Civic liberties for Christians not members of the state-endorsed churches were restricted until subsequent acts later in the mid 19th century. Property and educational rights were restricted by law until the late 19th century.[13]
- The church does not publish doctrinal statements, only affirming the truth of the New Testament.[8][14]
- Members share beliefs through oral tradition.[8][15][16]
- Members do not share spiritual beliefs indirectly through mass communication media, or books other than the Bible.[4]
- The community is widely distributed, and each home church is relatively small.[8]
- It does not have a centralized polity headquarters or physical buildings.[17]
- The church exists internationally, in regionally variable cultural contexts.[18]
- There are no representative spokespersons.
- The doctrine of separation minimizes engagement with external activity and commentary.[8][19][20]
- High tension is retained between the church’s primativism and institutional churches.[8][21][22]
- Doctrinal and traditional differences between the church’s first century primativism and post-3rd century creedal churches have historically led to heretication on both sides.[8][23][24]
- Media framing, sensationalization of privacy, perjorative labelling, and stigmatization may deter public engagement.[25]
- Publicity is shunned due to fear "worldly attention" would bring vanity and other characteristics, impeding their pursuit of humility.[8]
Evidence basis
Summarize
Perspective
Due to the oral tradition, direct sources are not available from the church as a whole, or members of the church.[4] Due to the decentralized, distributed nature, there is no single representative, or where from to share representative statements. The church has made no publications since its inception.[4] Current members do not participate in interviews or publications.[4]
Secondary Sources
A historical analysis on the early Christian church and Christian primitivism reviews the history and documented features of the church.[3]
Scholarship
Reliable Scholarship
A brief study in a Lutheran theological journal (Concordia Theologica Monthly) reviews the movement.[4]
Dissertations
A sociology masters thesis by a former member reports partisan views through studying former members reasons for leaving and other compilations of exit letters.[8]
Biased Sources
Self-Published Content
Religious critics, including an evangelical Christian apologists ministry, have commented on the community.[26]
An ex-member, Kropp-Ehrig, founded a website after disafiliating that posted a selection of letters they say have been privately sent between members, and published a journal from a worker in Ireland at the end of the 19th century.[9]
An accompanying website archives a selection of newspaper articles[27] and self-published content, including a letter responding to doctrinal and historical inquiry by an Irish worker from 1906.[28]
Editorial and opinion commentary
Online and literature commentaries are provided by ex-members who left the church.
Descriptions of the church are derived from these commentaries and letters.
Remove ads
Social, moral, and cultural issues
Summarize
Perspective
Non-conformity and anti-materialism
Social commentary in the late 19th and early 20th centuries centred on ministers’ lay ministry recruitment, anti-institutionalism, non-conformity to state churches, and criticism of salaried clergy and solicited collections.[4][9][18]
Women as Go-Preachers
Women have participated in joining the itinerant ministry since its inception, which was criticized by public in the early 20th century, when state churches did not allow ordination of women to preach.[29] This included a publicized defamation campaign against the church led by a man whose daughters had left home to become itinerant preachers; his campaign publicized that women joining the Go-Preachers was immoral.[29] A court case ruled these claims were libel, and required the father to acknowledge he had made false claims and offer a public apology.[29]
Privacy, Christian separation, and radical humility
Adherents shun publicity to avoid attention bringing effects of vanity and ego,[8] disturbing their peace,[18] or differences becoming divisions.[18] They make no publications, and have upheld this since their inception.[4] In the late 20th and early 21st century, publication of several articles and books, increased news coverage, and the appearance of the Internet have re-introduced the private community to the public with increased external commentary and sociocultural critiques.
Reasons for disaffiliation
Jones (2013), a former member, conducted an unpublished Sociology Masters Thesis survey among former members on disaffiliate websites on reasons for leaving.[8] The top three reasons were not believing doctrine, church origins, and feeling like they were living a lie due to their lifestyle outside of the church.[8] Disaffiliate typologies were (a) the dense social network of workers, family members, or friends was perceived as no longer socially plausible, including tension as a non-believer among believers, and the desire to appear and behave more “worldly”, (b) negative social tagging of the church, or (c) a crisis of faith.[8] Former member McConnell-Conti said to Radio New Zealand she considered the church “highly controlling” because she believed she would not have salvation if she left the church for “the world.”[30]
Child safety
In the 21st century, news organizations have focused on abuse cases, reporting accountability, hesitancy to make publications, and challenges in access to services due to the community not being a formal institution.[31][32] In 2024, the United States FBI posted an investigation after allegations of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), seeking survivors or individuals with knowledge of abuse and/or criminal behavior.[33]
Prevalence
Internationally, among the estimated 1-4 million members,[10] there have been ~2000 allegations since the 1980’s against 910 individuals[34] (as of 6/10/2024), resulting in 52 individuals convicted of abuse who were associated with the church.[35] The prevalence of CSA offenders is therefore estimated at 0.02-0.091% alleged perpetrators and 0.0013%-0.0052% convicted perpetrators among total membership. Approximately ~2000 members (0.05-0.67% of membership given variable population estimates of 300,000 to 4 million[10]) have reported CSA between 1980-2025.[36] In the general public of North America, 95% of CSA cases are never reported to authorities based on studies in North America.[37] Factoring in this general assumption[speculation?] that 95% of cases went unreported and population estimates of 300,000-4 million, this would estimate 1-13% of membership being affected by CSA. 16% of all girls and 8% of all boys in the general public of the general population of North America experience CSA.[37] The population estimates for the church varies by orders of magnitude, creating significant variability in denominators and statistics.[10]
Demographics
According to statistics maintained by an independent accountability and reporting not-for-profit, 40% of allegations from CSA survivors in the community name ministers as the offender, 10% of allegations name elders, 50% of allegations name members, and less than 2% of allegations name female perpetrators.[36]
Prevention and supports
MinistrySafe training courses,[38] mandated reporter training,[11] code of conducts,[39] counseling networks,[40]external accountability initiatives,[41][42][43] survivor funding systems,[44] and support groups and support networks[45] have been developed to prevent abuse and protect child safety, ensure criminals are prosecuted accountably, and support survivors of abuse in the community.
Independently professionally designed code of conducts are available that include education for overseers on immediate and appropriate action (i.e. temporary suspension or permanent dismissal from ministry) when there are allegations or charges of CSA against a worker, having open conversations about CSA, and conducting background checks on members who volunteer for the work.[39] They also provide education for workers on CSA topics to discuss with families, reporting resources, and support resources for survivors.[39] They recommend point people in each region for CSA information.[39] Education is also included for all members.[39]
Abuse cases
Australia
In April 2019, the Australian current affairs television show 60 Minutes interviewed child sex abuse victims of Australian workers and members. Noel Harvey, Ernie Barry, Chris Chandler, Cecil James Blyth and Greg Aylett were named as having been convicted of sex crimes. 60 Minutes said that victims who complained faced shunning while even convicted perpetrators were protected.[46][47] Former abuse victims and victim advocate Jillian Hishon have criticized the group's response for lacking impartiality and accountability.[48][49] Survivor advocate Laura McConnell-Conti has criticised the Australian Two by Twos for not participating in the National Redress Scheme (NRS), which is a voluntary government-facilitated process for institutions, requiring formally joining the NRS as a formal organization.[31] The NRS emerged as a result of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, and provides survivors with compensation if it occurred in an official institution.[31]
In 2023, the Two by Twos' Australasian overseers issued two letters to members acknowledging incidents of abuse overseas, condemning child abuse and encouraging victims to report abuse to the police.[citation needed] The overseers also announced they would establish an anonymous advisory group to develop child-safe policies and manage the group's response to historical child sexual abuse.[citation needed] In May 2024, the group's Australasian overseers launched a website with information about their response to historical child sexual abuse and a written apology to victims.[50]
New Zealand
In New Zealand, among 60 ministers and 2,500 members, there has been one repeat offender in the ministry (1.67%), convicted by admission and removed from the ministry, and 14 members (0.56%) told not to attend meetings on the basis of prior conviction or investigation.[32][51] In September 2024, Radio New Zealand (RNZ) reported that New Zealand Police were assisting the FBI investigation by investigating a former New Zealand minister for historical abuse.[32] William Stephen Easton was convicted by admission to 55 child sex abuse charges over three decades against young boys.[51] RNZ quotes Hishon, a former member of the church who runs a hotline for Australasian victims, and says “To date, they are all historical child sexual abuse, so they've happened years ago. So these people who have abused, some are still in the church, so some of the abusers are still in the church, they're still attending meetings, some of them, some have been removed, others have already passed away.”[32] RNZ quotes Religious expert, professor emeritus of history at Massey University, Peter Lineham, notes “this is a very vulnerable group of people.”.[32]
Radio New Zealand quoted a New Zealand Overseer Dean saying “ We acknowledge that these matters were not always appropriately addressed in the past, and we are truly sorry for any immeasurable long-term damage to victims. We have learnt from these experiences, and are constantly reviewing our current practices to keep children safe in our fellowship.”[32] Dean describes their response, saying anyone with accused of CSA is asked not to attend meetings; “we take every report seriously. Even when it is only considered as inappropriate behaviour”; Workers have a written Code of Conduct which they signed and were expected to adhere to in all situations, including when they were in members' homes; all workers had to undertake formal and refresher training to keep children safe and perpetrators were banned from meetings arranged by the ministry; “the fellowship fully cooperates with police investigations and reporting of child abuse was encouraged”; “We have done risk management plans and put procedures in place to mitigate the risk of further abuse happening”; and that Workers have a written Code of Conduct which they signed and were expected to adhere to in all situations, including when they were in members' homes.[32] The church has about 2,500 members and 60 ministers in New Zealand.[52] Peter Lineham of Massey University has been researching the group since the 1970s and said that it had been active in New Zealand for 120 years.[53]
United States
The US community is estimated at 10,000 to 500,000 people.[10] In June 2024, the American Broadcasting Company television news program Nightline aired a segment on child sexual abuse cases across the United States. An expanded report aired concurrently on season 2 of the Hulu docuseries Impact X Nightline.[54] In the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened an investigation in 2024.[55][56] An American former elder of the church, Raymond Zwiefelhofer, was sentenced to 120 years in prison in November, 2024, for 10 counts of possessing child sexual abuse material.[B]
In Nebraska and Kansas, a news agency asked the overseer about adopting an official policy; he reported all the workers in his area attended a university training on child safety; members with allegations are not allowed at conventions; he had written clear letters to members about child abuse and safety, and that abuse “would not be tolerated”; and “it was dealt with wrong in the past, but we are doing everything we can to do what’s right…We all have a fear of creating more policies to deal with these things; I believe we all know these actions are so wrong already. There are plenty of Bible verses written that can say it far better… There’s the Bible and there’s the natural law and they take care of everything. Why do we have to make more laws? The Bible’s very clear on it all and also the law of the land and we will abide by it.”[49]
Canada
Former minister Robert Corfield was convicted by admission for CSA of a child in Saskatchewan, Canada, in the 1980s.[57][58]
Sex
BBC (2025) said four unmarried women told them they were pressured into giving up their children for adoption (1950-1990).[56]
Fictional depictions
A few authors of popular literature have noted the church, even using it as background for various works.[59]
Remove ads
Name
Summarize
Perspective
Overview
Members refer to their belief system as "The Truth", the practice as "The Way", their gatherings as "meetings", and members as "the workers and friends".[18] Members identify as non-denominational Christians.[4]
Those outside the church refer to it as "Two by Twos", "The Black Stockings", "No-name Church", "Cooneyites", "Workers and Friends", "Truth 2x2s", or "Christians Anonymous", and journalists sometimes call it "2x2" for short.
Conscientious objection status was denied to adherents due to not having a formal name or organization; for the purposes of obtaining conscientious objector status, various regional names have been used that are otherwise not used or endorsed.
Endonym
The church identifies as nondenominational and forgoes a name.[60] Adherents refer to "The Truth", "The Way", "The Jesus Way", or "The Lowly Way".[61]
Long (1902) writes workers “were not desiring to make a new sect, but to obey God”.[62] McClung (1926) rejected exonyms, stating “We believe that to take any name but that of "Christian" would be dishonouring Him who shed His precious blood to redeem us, therefore this is the only name we can acknowledge.”[63] According to Piepkorn (1972), members see no need for an identifying name other than Christian.[4]
Exonyms
Those outside the church often use descriptive terms such as "Two by Twos" (from their method of sending out ministers in pairs),[64][65] "No-name Church", "Cooneyites", "Workers and Friends", "disciples of Jesus", "Friends", "Go-preachers", and "Tramp Preachers", among other titles.[66] The new movement was initially called "Tramp Preachers" or "Tramp Pilgrims" by observers.[67][68] In the early 20th century in Ireland, they called themselves by the name "Go-Preachers".[69][68] By 1904, the terms "Cooneyism" and "Cooneyite" were used by commentators in areas in which Edward Cooney established churches and where he was a vocal promoter, although this exonym was rejected.[70] The term "Two by Twos" was in use in Canada by the early 1920s[71] and in the United States by the 1930s.[72][68] In Germany, bynames for the church have included "Die Namenlosen" (the Nameless), "Wahre Christen" (True Christians), "Jünger Jesu" (Disciples of Jesus), and "Freunde" (Friends).[68][73] In France, they have been known as "Les Anonymes" (the Anonymous, or No-names).[74]
Obtaining Conscientious Objection Status
Various names have also been used when obtaining legal conscientious objection status during war. The church's various registered names include "Christian Conventions" in the United States, "Assemblies of Christians" and "The Alberta Society of Christian Assemblies" in Canada (dissolved only after it was exposed), "The Testimony of Jesus" in the United Kingdom, "Kristna i Sverige" in Sweden, and "United Christian Conventions" in Australia. These registered names are used only for specific purposes (for instance, to register conscientious objection during war) and are not routinely used by members.
Though overseers and head workers use registered names when necessary to conduct official business, most members do not associate a formal name with the church.[75] Few members are aware that the church has taken official names[76] used for church business,[77] including seeking military exemptions.[78] Registered names vary from nation to nation. In the United States, the name used is "Christian Conventions",[76][79] but in Canada, "Assemblies of Christians" is used.[80] In Britain, it is "the Testimony of Jesus",[81][82] and in Sweden the registered name is "Kristna I Sverige".[83] "United Christian Conventions" has been used in Australia and other nations[84] (Australian members previously adopted the name "Testimony of Jesus" during World War I, and registered as "Christian Assemblies" during World War II).[85] The church was also incorporated in Victoria, Australia, as a charity from 1929 until 2019 and held property in trust.[86] In 1995, controversy arose in Alberta, Canada, when part of the church incorporated as the "Alberta Society of Christian Assemblies". That entity was dissolved in 1996 after its existence became generally known.[87]
Remove ads
History
Summarize
Perspective
Overview
The formative context of 19th century Ireland included the Holiness movement, rising inter-denominational conflict between institutional churches, and decriminalization of non-conforming, non-creedal, and Unitarian beliefs (1889). A convergence of factors led to the formation of a restoration movement in 19th century Ireland.[3]
Home churches and prayer meetings of various types have played a longstanding role in cultivating and sustaining personal Christian practices for common people throughout history, both amidst persecution and revival, including the revivals and awakenings in Ireland and Scotland during the 17th and 18th centuries.[88] In Ireland, 1893, John Long started a small gospel prayer meeting in his parents home.[89]
Accounts of itinerant preaching, lay preaching, and voluntary apostolic poverty have remerged in different communities since described in the first century.[3] In Scotland, 1886, Scottish Evangelist John Govan, inspired by the Holiness movement, founded the interdenominational Faith Mission.[4] Pilgrims went two-by-two to minister in rural areas, “trusting in God for all of their needs.”[4] One of these ministers was William Irvine.[4]
In March, 1897, John Long and William Irvine met. In August 1897, Long organized for Irvine and Long to hold a mission in a Methodist church in Nenagh, Ireland. Long referred to this mission as “The Renewal” and “The Inception of the Go Preacher Movement.”[18] Subsequent missions followed wherever they were invited, including barns, homes, YMCA rooms, and tent revivals.[9]
The Renewal movement consisted of a surge of people leaving their homes, selling their belongings, and becoming itinerant lay ministers travelling two-by-two to spread the gospel through open-air preaching, gospel missions, house churches, and home prayer meetings. By 1898, there was an increase in prayer meetings and young converts holding missions.[9]
In the 19th century, the movement was an unsectarian, nondenominational, non-exclusive revival movement characterized by biblical primitivism, a spirit-led call to serve, and an itinerant lay ministry led by faith alone and living in apostolic poverty.
In 1901, a group of about 12 workers were rebaptising converts; other workers disagreed with this, and a conference was held by Cooney.[9] In 1903, Long prompted Irvine, who other workers looked to for leadership, to hold a unifying convention, after which baptism and house churches were universal.[9] In 1903, the tradition spread internationally.[9] In 1906, anti-clergy teachings were introduced in the British Isles.[9]
The movement gained attention due to outdoor cold-water believer’s baptisms by immersion; women as itinerant ministers; anti-material stances denouncing salaried clergy, monetization of the gospel, and institutionalized churches; and people who responded to these messages by physically attacking them during sermons.
After heretication by church publications and negative social tagging in the early 20th century, the community became socially encapsulated and increasingly discrete.
Three workers were excommunicated from the community.[18] Irvine excommunicated Long (who was the first to preach on faith lines, organized the Nenagh revival mission, and urged Irvine to coordinate the 1903 workers meeting to unify the workers while maintaining an unsectarian attitude) for believing there were born-again clergy members.[18] Workers excommunicated Irvine (who led the Nenagh and Ragmolyon missions, and brought together the 1903 workers meeting) in 1914 over doctrinal differences, eschatological beliefs, and prophesying a new order.[18] Workers excommunicated Cooney (who was the first to baptize and organize house churches for converts) over polity differences and his anti-hierarchical stance in 1928.[18]
Although other movements, such as the Plymouth Brethren and Elim have had strong Irish connections, this is the only church known to have had its origin and early development in Ireland.[90][91]
Legal context
State-enforced persecution of Christian nonconformists was introduced to the British Isles by the Roman Empire, where nontrinitarian Christianity was made a criminal offense by the Edict of Thessalonica (381) as imperial legislation enforced Orthodox Trinitarianism codified in AD 325, 381, and 431, at the Councils of Nicaea, Constantinople, and Ephesus.[92][93] Christian nonconformism to the state church was also criminalized by the United Kingdom, with non-Trinitarian beliefs punishable by death until 1697,[94] and non-trinitarians burned at the stake[95] or executed.[96]
In Ireland, non-Trinitarian belief remained a criminal offense prosecuted under common law blasphemy provisions and punishable by fines, imprisonment, and civil disabilities until the Dissenters (Ireland) Act 1817 (57 Geo. 3. c. 70), which followed the Unitarian Relief Act 1813 in England and Wales in decriminalizing non-Trinitarian worship.[97]
Christians not conforming to the state church were barred from owning property until the Nonconformists’ Chapels Act 1844 (7 & 8 Vict. c. 45).
Civil rights for Christians who were not a member of the state churches, including the right to hold political office, remained restricted by law until 1871.[98]
Educational rights for non-Trinitarians and Christians who were not members of the state Churches were restricted until 1889.[99]
Restorationism
Chandler (1983) reports church members hold to a long-standing view that the church has no earthly founder,[100] and that they represent the true Christian Church originating with Christ during the 1st century AD.[101] Cooney (1909) said, “We did not start this Jesus way… It was started and planned by God before we were ever thought of… It is not Cooney’s or another body’s way, it is God’s plan and way.”[102] Irvine (1907) said the workers had no leader but Jesus: “Why no leader?… Jesus alone is our captain and guide. He is the bishop of every church formed.”[103] Lloyd (2010) quotes Pollock, saying “there has not been continuity from Jesus’ time until now, but we feel there was a stump left somewhere, because today there is a tree.”[104]Preecs (1983) quoted a worker describing the beginning of the Go Preacher movement during the closing years of the 19th century.[105] Jaenen (2003) and Robinson (2005) report members describing a notable resurgence or restoration in the 19th century.[106][107] Donald Fisher (1983), a brother worker, writes “a favourite subject of Wm. Jamieson (when the Workers would be gathered in a home) was to tell us that as far back as we could trace this fellowship was unto Wm. Irvine. He spoke openly and freely of all which he knew of Wm. Irvine, etc. What he told us was unto enough people that it would be common knowledge state wide”.[108]Fisher (1983) writes he believes “ ‘faith’ has been keep alive since Jesus day until now.”[108] According to Preecs (1983), brother worker Walter Pollock stated that the fellowship does not make unsubstantiated claims about its origins: "We know that it began with a group of men in the British Isles around the turn of the century. That's as far as we've been able to trace it."[109] Sullivan (2012) wrote “Let me say assuredly that this fellowship we love so dearly was not started by any man. It is not the work of man. God planned this before He laid the foundation of the world, and in His faithfulness He has kept it the same throughout the ages”, describing the oral history of biblical restorationism among a small group of men studying the Bible in Ireland at the end of the 19th century and drawing biblical parallels with “No change from that which was from the beginning. Simply a renewal.”[110]
19th century
The Church in the Home
John Long’s journal describes a search for peace attending Methodist and Episcopal churches, but not finding peace.[9] His religious influences were his mother, who came from a religious family (denomination not reported) and focused on quiet moral living, his father, who converted to Methodism, his grandmother, who he read the Bible with, Church of Ireland day school, and Methodist cottage meetings.[18] He attended cottage meetings in 1889. In 1890 he became a domestic servent.[9] Long describes a calling to return his faith practice to his parents home, where he "started a gospel prayer meeting in the old home" in 1893.[89]
Colporteur networks and mission work
Long (1893) writes his “desires to go fully on the Lord's work increased. I knew that God was calling me into active service…. The good example of a young man named William Kenny from Ballingarry, Kings County, who after his conversion gave up his farm and went as a Colporteur in the Methodist society, set me thinking about doing the same thing. It seemed to be the only branch of Mission work open to me at that time.” In 1895, he left home and began travelling, reading the Bible and talking with people, preaching, and distributing bibles to rural and remote areas as a Methodist Colporteur.[9] He described barriers of priests telling people not to read the Bible and burning the New Testaments.[9]
Faith Mission
In Scotland, 1886, Scottish Evangelist John Govan, inspired by the Holiness movement, founded the interdenominational Faith Mission. Pilgrims went two-by-two to minister in rural areas, “trusting in God for all of their needs.”
Govan writes, "Faith Mission was founded in 1886, for the promotion of spiritual life and godliness through the evangelising of the country districts of Scotland, and farther afield if God leads, on unsectarian lines. Evangelists, called "Pilgrims," generally work in pairs. They visit a place for several weeks, more or less, according as circumstances and the leadings of the Spirit of God seem to indicate advisable, visiting among the people and holding meetings for the unsaved and for Christians, in which they welcome the cooperation of all who love the Lord Jesus in sincerity. The Mission is maintained on the faith principle, by freewill offerings during missions and unsolicited contributions.”[111]
One of these ministers was William Irvine. In 1896, William Irvine was sent from Scotland to southern Ireland as a missionary by John George Govan's Faith Mission, an interdenominational organization with roots in the Holiness movement.[112] Because his mission was successful, he was promoted to superintendent of Faith Mission in southern Ireland.[113]
Within a few months of his arrival in Ireland, Irvine was disillusioned with the Faith Mission.[115] There was friction over its Holiness teachings. Irvine saw Faith Mission leadership as hypocritical because, while the leader encouraged ministers to go out and preach on faith alone, the leader himself was wealthy and did not do so.[116] Irvine disagreed with the Faith Mission's cooperation with the other churches and clergy in the various communities of southern Ireland, regarding converts who joined churches as "lost among the clergy".[117][118]
The Renewal and the Go-Preacher movement
In March, 1897, John Long and William Irvine met.[9]
Nenagh Mission
In August 1897, Long organized for Irvine and Long to hold a mission in a Methodist church in Nenagh, Ireland.[9] Long referred to this mission as “The Renewal” and “The Inception of the Go Preacher Movement.”[9] The Nenagh Revival was held by John Long and Wm. Irvine, while John Long was a Methodist Colporteur and Irvine was a Faith Mission pilgrim.[9] Sister Oakley and thirty plus persons came under the umbrella of the Faith Mission; most of them afterwards gave up all that they had to dedicate their lives to itinerant ministry, including Jack Carroll and his sister May.[9]
Ragmolyon mission (October 1897)
Irvine left the Faith Mission due to his belief in an unpaid, faith-based ministry, and not in clergy. Irvine began to preach independently from the Faith Mission.
In October 1897, Irvine was invited by Nenagh businessman John "Jack" Carroll to preach in the Carrolls' hometown of Rathmolyon. There he held a series of mission meetings. Irvine rejected church buildings, rejected paying ministry, rejected collections[C] during services and collection boxes, and preached those seeking to join the ministry leave their homes, sell all, and give to the poor.[21]
In Rathmolyon, attendees began to leave their respective churches and join Irvine.[119] Some of these early adherents, including John Long,[D] the Carroll family, Edward Cooney—an influential evangelist from the Church of Ireland[120]—and George Walker (an employee of the Cooney family's fabric business[121]), eventually sold all and joined the new movement as itinerant preachers.[122]
Many people who attended these revival missions gave up all to go preach, and subsequent missions spread.
Converts were left to attend the church of their own choice.[9] Separation from other Christians was not a part of their teaching.[9] They did not set up meetings in the homes, did not re-baptize, or keep themselves separate.[9]
Cloughjordan mission (December 1897)
Irvine and Long preached in a mission in Cloughjordan, “well attended by people of all denominations”. Christians from Nenagh and Roscrea came to help, and it ended in a full day conference and open air preaching.[9]
Borrisokane (January 1898)
Irvine, Long, and other workers preached in an unsectarian mission in Borrisokane, 1998.[9]
Revival growth
By April, 1898, according to Long, “the testimony of the young converts worked conviction everywhere.” J.G. Govan sent two sister Pilgrims from the Faith Mission to help the revival: E. Pendreigh and A. McLean.[9] Long describes three pairs of workers who held missions: Pendreigh and McLean in Shinrone; Gilbert and Hughes in Portumna; and Irvine and Long in Templederry.[9] Missions occurred wherever they were invited: barns, outdoors, various churches, YMCA room, homes.[9]
By June, 1898, there was an increase in prayer meetings, and young converts began to hold missions in Meath, Kildare, and Tipperary.[9] Converts who began lay itinerent preaching did so in various nondenominational networks: some converts joined the Faith Mission, others joined Todd’s Mission in the Southeast of Ireland, and others went out not connected with any mission.[9]
Bible study on Mathew 10 (July 1898)
In July, 1898, Irvine, Long, and two others had a Bible study on Mathew 10, concluding Jesus’ instructions to sell all, give to the poor, and join the itinerant ministry outlined in Matthew 10 were still valid instructions today.[page needed][123] Long wrote: “While in Kilkee we had a Bible reading on Matthew 10. It was that Bible reading set me first thinking about going on Faith Lines.”[9]
The passage reads in part:
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: for the workman is worthy of his meat.
Faith lines
Irvine wanted Long to join the Faith Mission, but Long decided this wasn’t God’s will for him.[9] On January 1, 1899, John Long first set out on “faith lines”: leaving home on faith alone, having no salary, taking no public collections, making no appeal for donations, and travelling and ministering where he felt spiritually led.[9]
As described by Long, “Faith Lines is a preacher going forth without any fixed or stated salary, neither any public collections at meetings, but just trusting in God to put it into the hearts of God's people to give to the support of them who ministered in Spiritual things. If more came in than necessary learning to abound, if less learning to suffer lack.”[9]
He was joined by William Irvine, Alex Given, Tom Turner, George Walker, and Edward Cooney, who sold all they had, gave to the poor, and went out to preach. Many lay people joined, sold all they had, left their homes, and dedicated their lives to itinerent ministry, becoming what would later be referred to as workers.
Converts had “the option of their own will as to where they worship and get the most spiritual food.”[9]
20th century
In 1900, after receiving reports from Ireland of the Go Preacher movement, the Faith Mission released a letter clarifying its distinction from the movement, clarifying any ministers that previously worked with the Faith Mission who were now ministering as independent itinerant ministers were not affiliated with the Faith Mission.[124]
Early growth
Membership growth was rapid.[citation needed]
Balancing an unsectarian approach, the doctrine of separation, and cohesion
Cooney convened a meeting in 1901 due to confusion with a few workers who did not consider conversion experiences in other churches valid; most workers did not agree with this.[9] Irvine was not present. Long writes “The cause of the confusion and disorder arose from about twelve workers, mostly women, who were out preaching and used in getting other persons saved; yet got an experience in which they denied their first conversion…They were inclined to 'unChristianize' others who had not a similar experience; and put down the revival that gave them birth…They were very sanctimonious…They refused to take any correction.”[9]
In 1902, Cooney baptized converts and organized house churches among them.[9]
Irvine asked Long if he should “labour for God independently in a new district; as he shrank back from forming a new mission or sect; and the work and workers at that time were very scattered and disorganized.”[9] John Long urged him to get things organized; to call a convention; and “get the workers united together; and form the young converts into assemblies where they could get spiritual food, but to be open and unsectarian in attitude towards all other sects, missions and persons.”[9]
Irvine organized a Convention for Workers in Rathmolyon, Ireland on Willie Gill’s farm in July, 1903. Long describes “The workers began to baptize, and separate their converts; to form them into assemblies to meet together on the first day of the week for fellowship, breaking of bread and prayers. Also, they appointed bishops, or elders over them. William Irvine emphasized separation but not exclusiveness. It was from that conference a few workers including William Irvine, went to America for a gospel tour.”
Newspaper commentaries
Beginning in 1900, the British Parliament raised questions about the church.[125]
Cold-water baptism by immersion
The attention of Belfast newspapers was initially drawn to the Two by Twos church because of its open-air baptismal rites.[126] The baptisms took place in public settings such as streams, lakes, or the sea, even in cold weather. The outdoor "dippings" and accompanying sermons attracted large crowds.[127][128]
Street preaching
Newspapers reported on large marches through boroughs and public preaching in town squares and on street corners.[129][130]
Conflicts and criticism of clergy
The Faith Mission outreach added members to established denominations.[citation needed] Churches began noticing their congregations thinning after exposure to the Two by Two missions.[citation needed] Clerics said the Two by Two preachers were "inimical to the membership of the church".[131]
In 1909-1910, a newspaper said that Go Preachers Edward Cooney and George Walker publicly preached that all creeds and churches were damned.[132][133] The same newspaper said they singled out prominent individuals, and even entire communities, for condemnation.[134][135] At times, missions were sited close to denominational church buildings, which, according to another newspaper, were denounced using "extreme language".[136][137] Critics responded to these sermons with heckling, street violence,[138] and the break-up of families,[139] all of which brought further attention to the church.[126] Newspapers in Ireland, Britain, and North America followed the disturbances that arose over the church's activities and message.[140] Some hosted debates in their editorial columns.[141][142] One member of Parliament offered to join the Two by Twos if they would cease criticizing other religious bodies.[143]
Conventions
As the size of the ministry increased, the church's outreach expanded.[citation needed] Large gatherings were held in Dublin, Glasgow and Belfast during 1899.[citation needed] Annual conventions, modeled after the evangelical Keswick Conventions in England,[106] began to be held regularly in Ireland starting in 1903.[citation needed]
Intercontinental spread
In 1903, William Irvine, Irvine Weir, and George Walker, went on a mission to North America.[F] Missions to continental Europe, Australia, and Asia followed.[144]
Convening house churches
In 1904, the Impartial Reporter said ministers were not preaching a requirement to "sell all" in sermons.[145] At this time there were homeless itinerant missionaries (called "workers") and those who retained homes and jobs (called "friends" or "saints").[119][146] Weekly home meetings began to be held and presided over by "elders", who were typically the householder.[citation needed] During the next few years, this change became universal.[citation needed]
Crocknacrieve convention
In September 1904, a convention was hosted on John West's Farm.[9] According to Long, “There were no appeals for money; and no public collections; the strength and fruits of the teaching produced the necessary money which was given freely to defray the expenses which amounted to nearly fifteen hundred pounds; including the passages of those who went foreign; gave much preeminence to reading the Bible; and circulating them; and every worker was prone to spend much time in private prayer. Flirting or courting was not allowed; and the flesh or selfish life strongly condemned. Marriage was not forbidden; yet the unmarried life was commended as the freest for workers. The necessity of keeping prophets chambers and entertaining strangers was strongly set forth. At the close of the conference, every worker threw his or her money into one common purse; then it was equally divided on departing to the varied districts and fields of labour. At that convention Irvine warned the workers of speaking against men of God, such as J. G. Govan. Edward Cooney who was in great form tested the meetings every night; when the unsaved came in; and a gospel effort was made to win them. Those efforts were very fruitful for upwards of one hundred-some decided for Christ; and about the same number were baptized by immersion in a river near by.”
The church continued to grow rapidly and held regular annual conventions lasting several weeks at a time.[citation needed] Irvine traveled widely during this period,[timeframe?] attending conventions and preaching worldwide, and began sending workers from the British Isles to follow up and expand interest in various areas.[147]
Sectarianism
In 1905, Joseph Kerr, one of the workers, attended a conference in the Bridge of Allan in Scotland.[9] According to Long, “he was so disgusted with the way the Clergy preached; that he come to the conclusion that there are no clergymen saved. Without any charitable consideration of the conscience or opinion of others, he preached it at that convention. Irvine defended him, but Edward Cooney opposed him and tried to prove that John Wesley was a born again man.”[9] According to Long, prior to this, all workers believed “regeneration is a thing of the heart and cannot be always measured by external appearance, dress, salary or education. The Salvation of the Soul is by grace through faith to every one that repents and believes in Christ Jesus; and the experience, testimony and fruits of any clergymen bear witness to the indwelling of the Spirit of Christ.”[9] Long attributes the introduction of a new belief that all other clergy are false to Kerr.[9]
In July, 1906, at Crocknacrieve convention, Long writes “Edward Cooney emphasized re-baptism into their fellowship; which was the beginning of refusing fellowship with Christians of all other denominations; and raising a sectarian barrier which made their fellowship exclusive and sectarian.”[9]
Libel case
Beginning in 1906, attention came in the form of leaflets and billboard notices. W. D. Wilson, an English farmer whose unmarried children had left home and joined the Two by Two ministry, began publishing articles saying girls were being recruited by the church for “immoral purposes.”[148] In response, Edward Cooney brought a widely publicized suit for libel that was resolved by a settlement between the parties by the end of 1913.[29]
Overseers
A hierarchy was instituted by Irvine, and his most trusted associates in various regions were designated as "overseers" or "head workers".[citation needed] Each worker was assigned a particular geographical sphere and then coordinated the efforts of the ministry within his area.[149] Among the overseers were William and Jack Carroll, George Walker, and Willie Gill. Irvine continued to oversee worker conduct and finances, and his activities within their fields became regarded as interference.[150] Except for such annual conventions as he was able to attend across the globe, communications and instructions from Irvine passed through the overseers.[151]
Schisms
Excommunication of Irvine
Irvine's themes changed over time with eschatological themes beginning to appear in sermons.[152][G] By 1914, he had begun to preach that the Age of Grace, during which his "Alpha Gospel" had been proclaimed, was coming to a close.[citation needed] His message turned towards indicating a new era, which held no place for the ministry and hierarchy[153] that had rapidly grown up around the "Alpha Gospel".[154][153]
Australian overseer John Hardie was the first to break with Irvine and excluded him from speaking at the South Australia convention in late 1913. As 1914 progressed, he was excluded from speaking in a growing number of regions, as more overseers broke away from him.[155]
Workers said Irvine "had lost the Lord's anointing". He was shunned and his name was no longer mentioned.[153] There were many excommunications of Irvine loyalists in various fields during the following years, and by 1919, the split was final, with Irvine moving to Jerusalem and transmitting his "Omega Message" to his core followers from there. Lacking any organizational means of making his case before the membership, Irvine's ouster occurred quietly.[151] Most members continued following the overseers, and few outside the leadership knew the details behind Irvine's disappearance from the scene, as no public mention of the split seems to have been made.[156] Mention of Irvine's name was forbidden,[by whom?] and a new explanation of the group's history was introduced [by whom?]from which Irvine's role was erased.[157][H]
Cooney
Edward Cooney did not place his evangelistic efforts under the control of the overseers.[citation needed] Cooney himself adhered to the earlier style of itinerant ministry, moving about wherever he felt he was needed.[158] He rejected the appointment of head workers to geographic regions and criticized their lifestyles.[159] He also preached against the "Living Witness" doctrine (i.e., that salvation entails hearing the gospel preached directly by a worker and seeing the gospel made alive in the sacrificial lives of the ministry), the bank accounts controlled by the overseers, use of halls for meetings, conventions, the hierarchy that had developed, and the ministry and the registrations under official names.[119][159] His message urging a return to the original principles of Matthew 10 gained a following, including among some Australian overseers.[160]
A second division occurred in 1928 when Edward Cooney was expelled for criticizing the hierarchy and other elements that had arisen within the church, which he saw as serious deviations from the church's original message. Johnson (1995) says that after an attempted and failed faith healing, overseers excommunicated Cooney.[161] People who agreed with Cooney joined him, including some of the early workers, and they continued to practice what they perceived to be the original tenets.[162] The term "Cooneyite" today chiefly refers to the group which separated (or were excommunicated) along with Cooney and who continue as an independent group. Prior to the schism, onlookers had labeled the entire movement as "Cooneyites" due to Edward Cooney's prominence in the early growth of the church. There are areas where this older usage continues.[163]
Consolidation
These schisms were not widely publicized, and few were aware that they had occurred.[citation needed] Among those disfellowhipped were the early workers May Carroll, Irvine Weir (one of the first workers in North America, who was excommunicated for continued contact with Cooney and for his objection to registration of the church under names),[164] and Tom Elliot (who had conducted baptisms of the first workers and was nicknamed "Tom the Baptist").[165]
Political neutrality
People left local Protestant churches in Ireland to join the two-by-two movement. At this time,[timeframe?] there were increasing demands[by whom?] for Irish independence, largely driven by the Catholic majority community.[citation needed] The Two by Twos did not form a political front with Protestant churches against the Catholic Church.[166][167] Although the church was noted[by whom?] for anti-Catholic views, it played a very minor role during the struggle for Irish independence.[citation needed] One family that may have been associated with the church, the Pearson family, owned land where a mass path to the Catholic Church crossed their land; they were murdered and their house burned by the IRA in the killings at Coolacrease.[168][169]
Progressive privacy
In the mid-1920s, a magazine article entitled "The Cooneyites or Go-Preachers"[170] disturbed the leadership, who made efforts to have it withdrawn,[171] particularly when material from the article was added to the widely distributed reference Heresies Exposed.[172]
During this period, the church modified its evangelical outreach. The public preaching of its early days was replaced with low-key "gospel meetings", which were attended only by members and invitees.[citation needed] The church began to state that it had a 1st-century origin.[156][173] It [according to whom?]said that it had no organization or name and disclaimed any unique doctrines.[citation needed] The church shunned publicity, making the church very difficult for outsiders to follow.[174][175]
Clarifying fields
The North American church saw a disagreement between overseers George Walker in the east and Jack Carroll.[citation needed] In 1928, an agreement was forged between the senior overseers that limited workers operating outside of their appointed geographical spheres, known as "fields": workers traveling into an area supervised by another overseer had to first share their revelation with,[176] and obtain permission from, the local overseer. [177] The exact boundaries between fields was worked out over time, and there were areas where workers under the control of more than one overseer operated, causing disagreement.[178]
In 1930, at a conference of workers, a decision was made to resolve past disagreements and reconcile the disagreement between Jack Carroll and George Walker. This was held in/at W. Hanney in England. A Statement was signed by 16 workers that read: “It was unanimously agreed by all present that the past should be buried and that in the future all would use their influence to discourage anything that would disturb the peace in God’s family, adhering to the teaching and example of Jesus.”[18]
Conscientious objection
During the World War I, the church obtained exemption from military service in Britain under the name "The Testimony of Jesus".[citation needed] However, there were problems with recognition of this name outside the British Isles, and exemption was refused in many other areas.[179] In New Zealand during World War I, members of the church could not prove their conscientious objector status, and formed the largest segment of those imprisoned for refusal to serve.[180][181] Members and ministers also had difficulty establishing their conscientious objector status in the United States during the World War I.[175] With the start of the Second World War, formal names were adopted and used in registering the church with various national governments.[J][182] These names continued to be used for official business, and stationery bearing those names was printed for the use of overseers. Most members were not aware of these names. Some who dissented after learning of the practice were expelled by the workers.[183][164]
Internal politics
After the death of Australian overseer William Carroll in 1953, an attempt was made to reintegrate the repudiated adherents of William Irvine and Edward Cooney. [citation needed] This resulted in disagreement over (a) the church's history, (b) the development of legal names, and (c) polity (i.e. overseers).[citation needed] Many excommunications took place in the subsequent effort to enforce harmony.[184][185]
The earliest workers and overseers were succeeded by a new generation of overseers. In Europe, William Irvine died in 1947,[186] Edward Cooney died in 1960,[187] and John Long (expelled in 1907) died in 1962.[citation needed] British overseer Willie Gill died in 1951.[citation needed] In the South Pacific, New Zealand overseer Wilson McClung died in 1944, and Australian overseer John Hardie died in 1961.[citation needed] In North America, both Jack Carroll,[188] the Western overseer, and Irvine Weir died in 1957 while Eastern overseer George Walker died in 1981.[189]
Privacy
Its lack of a name and policy of not revealing its finances,[190] doctrine, or history,[K] and avoidance of publicity[L][191] largely kept the church from public notice.[192]
Into the 21st century
Until the mid 1980s, notes regarding the Two by Twos had appeared infrequently in religious journals and sociological works, with some writers assuming that the church had greatly declined, with nothing published regarding it.[193][194] In 1982, the publication of The Secret Sect was followed by press reports and public statements by former members.[195][196] Other books and news coverage dealing with the church appeared in the following decades and increased awareness of the church and its practices.[citation needed]
Regional differences and the appearance of dissent have occurred.[specify] Kropp-Ehrig, a former member, said some standards have been loosened in some areas.[197][198] Availability of information on the Internet and elsewhere has increased.[199]
21st century legal cases are outlined in full in the Social, Moral, & Cultural section.
Remove ads
Beliefs
Summarize
Perspective
Non-creedal
No officially affirmed doctrine
Chryssides (2001) and Melton (2009) write all teachings are based solely on the Bible.[M][N] Fortt (2010) quotes a worker saying there is no other set doctrine.[103] All teachings are expressed orally, and the church does not publish doctrine or statements of faith.[200][201] External reporting on church beliefs is therefore limited, and may not be representative.
Quotes
Low-level evidence
Letters and quotes from individuals have not been affirmed by the church as representative. A worker from 1906 responded in letter to doctrinal inquiry.[28] Former members have posted online several letters and notes[202][203][204][205][206][207][23] and self-published a compilation of select quotes,[103] with no context or full or validated sermons available.
According to Long (1906), “Generally speaking, the doctrine of the Go Preachers was orthodox purged from ritualism, and worldly pleasures”.[9]
God
Fortt (2010) quotes Butler (1967), “God was and is the Creator.”[103]Fortt (2010) quotes Bailor (1989), “there is one God.”[103] Fortt (2010) quotes Allen (1989), “God is our Father.”[103]
Christ
Pattison (1935) writes Irvine preached “Jesus was a common man" and therefore both levelling social distinctions and relatable to the common people.[208][23] Pattison (1935) describes Irvine (1897) focusing on "Christ [living] in you”.[23] Fortt (2010) quotes Allen (1989) saying “God is our Father, and Jesus is our elder brother.” Notes on workers read "Jesus was a child, saint, and servent… Jesus was a saint before he was a servant…the pattern for the saints;"[202] "Jesus is the bread of life;"[203] "Christ is in the heart";[202] and "God's greatest message to the world is Christ; Christ the Lamb - our Redeemer ... Christ the Child - our example ... Christ the Lord - our King ... Christ the Master - our Teacher ... Christ the Word - our Authority .. Christ the Light - our Guide ... Christ the Resurrection - our Hope."[204] In notes from one speaker, Jesus is described as having both natures as "Son of God and the Son of man", with his "human nature" "becoming obedient", and "the divine nature was master over the human nature". "Give all hope of the power of the divine nature to give victory over the human nature and be obedient to God in our sphere of obedient service to God as Jesus was obedient in his sphere of service to God." Fortt (2010) quotes Propp, saying “God, Jesus, and Spirit are one in that they are united, but not one in single personality.”[103] Allen (1989) saying “Jesus said ‘That they may be one as we are one.’ This was a number of people with one heart, mind and spirit to do one thing. There is one mind and heart of Father and Son and Spirit. It is important to have unity of heart and mind and spirit to do the will of God as Jesus to do the Father's will.“[103]
Salvation
“Salvation… is God's deliverance in our lives. It is God giving us victory in our own hearts over ourselves.”[103] “By abiding in Him, we can receive divine life.”[103] Fortt (2010) quotes Pattison, saying ”Jesus does not look for sinless perfection, but He does look for love and our heart’s affection.”[103] “Where there is love, there will be sacrifice; if we really love the Lord, there will be sacrifice.”[103] Fortt (2010) quotes Anderson saying “where there is love, there is sacrifice,” and that “sacrifice is an expression of love;” Blonke saying “self-denial is our part in salvation;” Boyce describing a “spirit of sacrifice;” and Birille saying “joy follows sacrifice.”[103] "It is by ‘dying’ to the human ["the pride or selfishness of my own heart"] that we live unto the divine".[205] "You must give yourself to the Lord if you want Him to give Himself to you."[205] "To obtain true peace: Obey the Spirit of Christ in you. God can make us partakers of His Divine Life."[206] Another worker is quoted as stating "Apart from Christ being revealed in the heart, no man can be saved. Their salvation does not consist of walking in the way, of having fellowship with us, but of having Christ governing and ruling their lives from day to day." [207]
Humility, imperfection, and fallibility
Quotes documented in early convention notes include themes of humility, submission, personal revelation, and personal relationship with God:
"There are no perfect preachers in the world and never have been except Jesus, and He was the most found fault with of any man."[209]
"God's way is right, perfect even though all who walk in it are imperfect. If we all turn aside, God's way is still the same and is right and perfect."[209]
"I don't know how long I may continue in the path, but if I ever turn aside, it is not because the way is wrong, but because the pride or selfishness of my own heart would not allow me to continue in it any longer."[209]
External commentary
Former members and critics of the church have made statements about its beliefs, although these points have rarely been publicly responded to by any authorities within the church.[210]
Theology proper: Monotheism
According to former member Kropp-Ehrig, the church believes "There is only one God. God is God, the Father, the Creator." [citation needed]
Christology
Kropp-Ehrig (2022) writes that some people in the fellowship understand the relationship between Christ and God through a range of low to high christologies.[7] Lloyd (2010) quotes Bors (1979), saying how this unity is communicated depends on who they are talking to.[103] According to Nichols (2006) and Melton (2009), adherents believe in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and hold a Unitarian view of Jesus.[211] Parker and Parker (1982) say the tradition teaches Jesus is God's son, a fully human figure who came to earth to establish a way of ministry and salvation.[212] Fort (1994) writes the community does not believe Jesus is God himself.[213][214] Christian Research Institute, a self-published Evangelical apologist ministry, comments adherents express themes of belief in “the Word of God made flesh”, Christ as the perfect expression of God, Christ living again within, and following the example of Jesus.[215][216] According to McClure (1907), adherents beliefs are generally nuanced towards Unitarianism.[217][13] According to Woodard (1997) and Walker (2007), the church has rejected the doctrine of the Trinity[218] since its inception.[219][O] According to Piepkorn (1972), “the fellowships views on the Trinity are those commonly held by conservative Christian groups, so are their positions on the deity and humanity of Christ, and on the atonement through His death on the cross, published statements of the movements critics notwithstanding.”[4]
Hamartiology
Doctrines of predestination and Augustinian original sin (inherited guilt) are not endorsed.[220] According to Piepkorn, they believe God is the judge of people, not them.[4]
Soteriology
Atonement, Incarnational Healing, & Recapitulation
According to Piepkorn, the community has orthodox beliefs in atonement through Christ.[221][4][222] Piepkorn recounts the community has received strongly polemical evaluation from a commentator with a dispensationalist perspective, charging the community with believing Christ had to overcome sin and his human nature through his life.[221]
Grace and synergy
Piepkorn writes, “there is a strong focus both on Gods grace and on holiness as the necessary and deliberate choice of Christ’s followers.”[4][P]
Faith, Rebirth, Participation, Submission, Transformation, & Sanctification
According to Piepkorn (1972), “[spiritual] rebirth is seen [by the fellowship] as the indispensable criteria of salvation,” the result of faith in the Word of God.[4] The community believes in the work of the Holy Spirit in people’s lives; Piepkorn writes that the community was accused of ignoring the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit in peoples lives, but rejected this as an unwarranted accusation.[4][221] According to Johnson (1995), the community believes salvation requires self-sacrifice (i.e. self-denial; submission to God) in following the example and commandments of Jesus.[Q][223] According to Johnson (1995), suffering is revered.[by whom?][223] Christian Research Institute writes adherents believe in following the example of Jesus, and in Christ, as the living Word of God and the pure expression of God, living again within.[26]
Election
In 1910, a newspaper reporter wrote they held that salvation is given to those with spiritual life.[224]
Summary
Salvation is the work of God in human lives.[103] Salvation is unity with God, enabled by atonement and reconciliation, occurring synergistically through the ceaseless work of the Spirit in one’s heart and life affecting body, soul, and spirit towards a personal transformation of faith and willingness for submission to God; repenting through a complete change in mind and purpose; following Christ in living for God and expressing love as a voluntary offering of self-denial, i.e. spiritual mortification; abiding in God and growing in grace; and receiving the divine life.[103][225][103]
Remove ads
Practices
Summarize
Perspective
Primitivism
As described by Irvine (1913), adherents "seek to follow the pattern given by Jesus and the apostles and keep close to the practices of the early Church, as there are so many different interpretations."[22] This reflects a primativist/restorationist tradition, differentiated by reformationists as they did not see their movement as novel, but consistent with the early Christian church in the Acts of the Apostles.[226]
Sacraments / ordinances
Baptism
Believer’s Baptism by immersion is practiced. [227] Baptism has been described in letters by workers as symbolic of burial (ie dying to the "old self"), new life, and a sacred vow.[228] Baptism is considered [by whom?] a necessary step for salvation.[citation needed] The church shares baptism approaches and doctrine with Believer’s Church traditions.[227] According to an unnamed letter attributed to a worker, a minister "in fellowship with Jesus" “ who had been willing to follow Jesus in his Way” can baptize. New converts baptised in other churches or traditions may be re-baptised.[9][227] Baptisms are conducted in cold outdoor water.[127][128] Baptisms are often scheduled for one morning during a Convention in a nearby pond, lake, river, creek or ocean.[18] Families and onlookers gather, pray, and sing hymns during the ceremony, as led by a worker.[229][230] Baptism is conducted “in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.”[4]
Communion
Communion is shared weekly, with bread and wine (or grape juice) personally taken by members in Sunday morning meetings.[231] Only adherents who are baptized partake in communion.[8] According to Holt (1992), "Each individual decides if he/she is worthy [to partake] or not."[232] According to Holt (1992), “If a person is willing for the separation necessary, but has not yet had the opportunity for baptism, they are free to take of the emblems,” however it is important to “understand the seriousness of partaking.”[232]
Bibliology and Scripture
The community affirms the Bible as its only scripture, and the study of the Bible receives prominent focus.[4] In English language services, the King James Version is commonly, though not exclusively, used.[4]
Prayer and Meditation
Lloyd quotes Carroll emphasizing the need to “separate himself and wait upon God,” contemplative practice, “cultivation of the personal, private walk with God,” “getting to know [God’s] whisper in the secret depths of our hearts,” and “listening to the voice of God in our hearts.”[103]
Remove ads
Ecclesiology
Summarize
Perspective
Christian simplicity
A catchphrase frequently used to describe the church is: "The church in the home, and the ministry without a home."[119][233] Church members and workers describe that the church does not own any buildings.[7][page needed] Some church members who own rural or semi-rural properties dedicate them to worship, housing workers, and church gatherings during conventions and special meetings.[7][page needed] The concept of church buildings is seen as inconsistent with biblical Christianity and was strongly denounced by early workers.[234] Its ministers do not own homes or earn salaries. The church has upheld these practices since its inception.[235][236] Buildings specially constructed or repurposed for the use of the church do exist, including convention buildings, meeting halls,[237] tents, caravans, and portable halls.[238] Rural properties are primarily held and maintained on behalf of the church by certain members.[239][240] However, in recent years, a Northern Irish investment vehicle has been used to purchase English convention property.[241] A dedicated church building was constructed in Canada early on, but eventually was rejected by Irvine.[242]
One True Church
Commentaries say adherents identify with the one true church. [243][244]
Terminology
According to Fort (1994), the following terms are commonly used by adherents in English-speaking countries.[R]
- Church
- Generally refers to a small local group that meets in a home; can refer to a larger group of believers. This term is never used to refer to a building except for church buildings of other denominations. Used colloquially when talking to strangers to refer to Sunday/Wednesday activity, e.g., "I'll be at church until midday." Some regions choose not to use this word at all, emphasizing the church's separation from other mainstream beliefs.
- Meeting
- A gathering of members held in members' homes or rented buildings.
- Field
- A geographical region to which workers have been assigned (similar to parishes)
- Mission
- A series of larger meetings known as gospel meetings, the function of which is proselytizing.
- Friend, saint
- Adherent or member of the laity. Collectively "the friends" or "the saints".
- Profess
- To make a public declaration of one's willingness to become a member is generally a sign that a person may participate in the prayer and testimony sections of Wednesday night and Sunday morning meetings or at designated testimony times in larger gatherings. Professing constitutes an intermediate stage. Following baptism, the partaking of bread and grape juice (or wine) is also permitted, which occurs between the elder's testimony and the final hymn in some fields.
- Bishop, elder, deacon
- A chairman of a local meeting. Usually, the male head of the house in which meetings are held. The bishop/elder is typically the person in charge of calling the start of the meeting. The deacon is considered an alternative to the elder in some areas.
- Worker, servant, apostle
- Terms used to denote the church's semi-itinerant, homeless ministers. These are unmarried (several exceptions were made during the first half of the 20th century to allow married couples to enter the ministry) and do not have any formal training. Workers go out in same-sex pairs (hence the term "Two by Two"), consisting of a more experienced worker with a junior companion.
- Head worker, overseer
- The senior worker in charge of a geographic area roughly corresponds to the position of a bishop in Catholicism. No hierarchical position is higher than overseer—such as a pope.
- Not professing
- Any person who has not made a public declaration of their intention to follow Jesus during a meeting (see “Profess”).
- The world, worldly person
- A broad term used to describe all people not involved in the church, including those in other religions
Remove ads
Anthropology & Culture
Summarize
Perspective
Piepkorn (1972) observes “there is a strong in-group feeling in the fellowship. Mutual aid, even to the point of sharing possessions in times of need, plays an important part.” [4]
According to Piepkorn (1972), member’s modest attire is a part of rejecting worldliness. Members wear simple, modest clothing, and no jewelry (except a wedding ring if married).[4] Women have long hair, and men have short hair. Members do not get piercings, do not dye their hair, do not get tattoos, and avoid activities deemed to be worldly or frivolous[200][245] (such as smoking, drinking alcohol, watching television, and viewing motion pictures).[246]
The use of television, social media sites, and other mass media is discouraged in some areas, based on the stance of the local workers and overseers.[247]
Cultural variability
Standards and practices vary geographically: for example, in some areas, wine is used in Sunday meetings; in other areas, grape juice is used; in some areas, people who have divorced and remarried are not allowed to participate in meetings, particularly women, while in others they may.[248] Some external standards in dress and conduct have been loosened in recent years in response to criticisms.[198]Assumes causality[speculation?] While rules are not strictly 'enforced' and vary between families, the church values dedication to the doctrine.[according to whom?]
Remove ads
Meetings
Summarize
Perspective
Participation
Participatory practices
Members attend meetings, pray, and testify at them.[8][249] According to Piepkorn (1972), “Men and women alike may address the assembly on Bible passages of their own choice, and their understanding and interpretation of the passage is received respectfully.[4]”
Non-charismatic
Although the church has roots in the Holiness movement and has inherited some of its features, charismatic elements are suppressed.[106] Piepkorn (1973) writes “while the services appear bland…the congregations assemble with eager and quiet expectancy a full quarter of an hour before the scheduled time that the meeting is to begin.”[4]
Gatherings
The church holds several types of gatherings throughout the year in various locations.[S] Meetings include participatory prayer and testimony home meetings (Sunday worship and mid-week Bible study),[8] public gospel meetings,[8] conventions (including tent meetings),[8][4] elder and workers meetings,[18] and baptisms (outside).[4] Family meetings,[4] personal house visitations,[8] and fellowship potlucks also occur.[9] Funerals and weddings, are by family invitation, and may also include prayers and/or sermons.[250] According to notes attributed to an elder, "the purpose of our meeting is to worship. One meaning of worship is "our whole being going out to God". The chorus of hymn number 243 describe: "worship". "Gladly yielding all, moved by love divine." We come to meeting to give ourselves again because of the love and gratitude in our hearts."[251]
- Gospel meeting
- A Gospel meeting is open to both members and those who are not a member of the church.[252] At one time, Gospel meetings were typically held in tents, set up by workers as they traveled; they are now most commonly held in a rented space.[T] Gospel meetings are held to attract new members, though professing members typically make up the majority of attendees. The Gospel meeting consists of a period of quiet, followed by congregational singing (often accompanied by piano) of selected hymns, and then sermons delivered by the church's workers. Gospel meetings are regularly scheduled for portions of the year in areas where the group is well-established. They may also be held when a worker believes there may be people in the region who would be receptive to the church's message.
- Sunday morning meeting
- Participation in this closed[253] meeting is generally restricted to members. It is usually held in the home of an elder, and consists of a cappella singing from the regular hymnal,[254] partaking of communion emblems[229][255] (a piece of leavened bread and a cup of wine or grape juice),[256] prayer and sharing of testimonies by members in good standing.[257]
- Bible study
- Participation in this closed meeting is generally restricted to members, and is usually held in the home of an elder each Wednesday evening. Members are assigned a list of Bible verses or a topic of study for consideration during the week, for discussion at the next meeting. As the meeting progresses, each member shares thoughts regarding the scripture or topic. Thoughts are shared by individual members in turn, and members do not engage in discussions during the meeting. The Bible study meeting includes hymns and prayers.
- Union meeting
- This is a monthly gathering of several congregations, and follows the format of the Sunday morning meetings. Union meetings are not open to the public.
- Special meeting(s)
- Special meetings are annual gatherings of members from a large area. Each is held as a private gathering, often in a rented hall. Special meetings last a single day, and include sermons by local and visiting workers. The sermons are interspersed with prayers, hymns, and testimonies.
- Convention
- These annual events are attended by members from within a larger geographical area than for the special meetings. These services generally follow the format used for special meetings. Conventions are held over several days, usually in rural areas on properties with facilities to handle housing, feeding, and other necessities for those who attend. There are typically crude male and female dormitories, a dormitory for the Workers, and male and female communal bathrooms with simple showers. Conventions are not open to the public, although outsiders often attend by invitation. Although not now usual, members were at one time segregated by sex during services.[240]
- Workers' meeting
- These gatherings are not open to either the public or general membership. Attendance and participation are restricted to workers and certain invited members. The meeting may be a regular Bible study, or it may be used to disseminate any instructions from senior workers or to issue decisions about controversial matters. They are held during conventions, or as necessary. These meetings include prayer, a period for testimonies from any workers wishing to share, and may include statements by senior workers in attendance.
Ministry
Summarize
Perspective
Apostolic appointment by Spirit
John Long (1893) writes, “Conversion and the Holy Spirit are the essential qualifications for the ministry of the word…” and “every believer is ordained”.[89] He discusses spirit-led appointment over ecclesiastical credentialism or formal church employment, in the context of the requirement at the time among Protestants and Roman Catholics that appointing required formal seminary education.[89]
Apostolic faith and form
The ministry adheres to the validity of apostleship being personal faith and submission to God, as evidenced by willingness for and adherence to living out apostolic life (ie apostolic poverty and itinerant preaching) and doctrine in alignment with testimonies received through the witnesses of the gospel shared since the first century.[3] According to Cornelius (2003), this is not an unbroken line of direct person-to-person, immediately consecutive, successively appointed bishops, hired, titled, and appointed within the same church institution, extending from the apostles to present day (ie intra-denominational or intra-institutional apostolic succession).[258] Piepkorn (1972) writes workers believe they have apostolic succession and authority, and states “since the servants literally "live the life" that Christ commanded, going out two by two with nothing in their hands or pockets, their unqualified commitment tends to provide moral support for their authority.”[4] Ex-member Kropp-Ehrig (2022) describes this is a spiritual, not literal, succession following the examples of Jesus and the Apostles in the Bible, and notes restorations to living the examples of Jesus and the apostles have existed in different communities over time. [18] Historian Dr. Cornelius J. Jaenen (2003) also clarifies a distinction between apostolic succession and a succession of witnesses of apostolic doctrine and fellowship, writing there is generally no sufficient evidence for any direct apostolic succession in any continuous community, yet “there has been a chain of witnesses of the apostolic doctrine and fellowship over the centuries” (P. 538).[259] Jaenen writes “it mattered little to [the fellowship] whether they were part of a chain of faith, a survival of truth, a succession of believers, or a restored church. They held to the apostolic doctrine and fellowship, they possessed an apostolic ministry and church on the New Testament model, and they were led by the Holy Spirit. Whether the Spirit of God had restored the true faith after a lapse in its manifestation, or whether the Spirit had rekindled some smouldering embers of a small obscure remnant, mattered little. What was important was that those who would be led by the Spirit would be the children of God. God did not reveal all the secrets of his work with humanity. Those were views held in past centuries and we should not be astonished to find they are held by some in our day.” (p. 540).[260]
Voluntary poverty
The church's ministerial structure is based on Jesus' instructions to his apostles found in Matthew chapter 10, verses 8–16 (with similar passages in Mark and in Luke). Following these Biblical examples, its ministers have no permanent dwelling places, minister in pairs, sell all and go out with only minimal worldly possessions, take no collections, request no donations, and rely only upon hospitality and generosity.[261][262] Ministers receive their support unsolicited, mostly directly from lay members, and have no fixed address except for mail collection.[119]
Lay ministers
The option of entering the ministry is open to every baptized member. Workers do not engage in any formal religious training.[263]
Roles
Workers function as itinerant ministers, evangelists, spiritual teachers, and pastors.[4] Workers provide personal counsel, attend local house churches while visiting an area, hold public gospel meetings, and conduct baptisms.[9][4] They also travel more broadly to prepare and preach at conventions in multiple regions.[8] Workers organize and assign members to the home meetings, appoint elders, and decide controversies among members. Workers are not registered marriage celebrants, so members are married by secular functionaries (such as a justice of the peace). However, workers will give sermons and prayers at members' weddings if requested, and they officiate at the funerals of members.[264] According to notes from a workers meeting, "there are three words that govern the life of a worker: Love of God, Dying Life, and Slave."[265]
Gender Roles
Female workers have been equally ordained to preach since the inception of the tradition. Female workers operate in the same manner as male workers. Female workers do not hold the position of overseer. Female workers participate in, but do not chair, meetings when a male worker is present.[266]
Semi-Coenobitic, Semi-Eremitic
Workers live, travel, and preach in same-sex pairs, as co-workers and spiritual companions.[4] They regularly both participate in prayer meetings and fellowship with other workers and the community, and withdrawal for solitary contemplative practice.[8][3] It has been many decades[timeframe?] since married people were accepted into the ministry.[266]
Written, spoken, and lived Word
According to a newspaper opinion piece reporting on the ministry in 1910, ministers believe salvation is offered to those who have spiritual life. It describes a belief that spiritual life spreads spiritual life, and that the gospel (the word of the New Testament) must be both preached (orally personally shared) and lived (i.e. the example and teachings of Jesus and the instructions to the apostles, e.g. the workers’ apostolic poverty).[116][68] During the early years,[timeframe?] this was referred to as the "Living Witness Doctrine", though that term is no longer used. Sharing and spreading the gospel, as preached and lived by a witness, occurs in person, rather than by broadcasts, recordings, books or tracts, or other indirect communication.[210][267] Fortt (2010) quotes Norman (1978), saying “the Testimony is not said, it’s lived.”[103]
Some sources have referenced the 19th century workers teaching the Living Witness doctrine, believing that life comes from life, and that reading the Bible is held as insufficient for salvation unless its words are made alive through living witness, that clergy were not living witnesses, and that the workers were the only ministry of living witnesses, since they lived out apostolic poverty and an itinerant ministry.[U][268][according to whom?] The worker that this was first attributed to clarified in letter that he did not teach an exclusive formulation of the "Living Witness Doctrine", but rather the value for preaching as a way to communicate the word of God.[269] He clarified (a) this was not intended to be exclusive (ie that the preacher had to be of a particular denomination), (b) direct personal revelation was also valid, as exemplified by Paul, and (c) that there was no place in the universe where the voice of God cannot be heard.[269] Notes from a workers meeting were leaked in 2024, documenting workers affirming the rejection of the exclusivist formulation of the living witness doctrine (ie that salvation only comes through workers) and highlighting the importance of personal faith over lineage. The extemporaneous preaching of the ministry is considered to be guided by God[270][60] and should be shared personally.[271][272] Great weight is given to the thoughts of workers, especially more senior workers.[273]
Coordination
Summarize
Perspective
Communication
While distributed, the community network is cohesive. According to Piepkorn (1972), “communication within the fellowship is very good and makes extensive use of personal contacts and mail.”[4]
Polity
Overseer positions have oversight of a specific geographic region; these positions consist of senior male workers. Senior overseers oversee head workers within their region. Head workers have oversight of a single state, province or similar area, depending on the country; these positions also consist of male workers.[274] These head workers handle the two-by-two pairing and field assignments of workers for that area. Overseers pair new workers with senior companions until they are deemed ready to move beyond a junior position.[275] The workers are assigned new companions annually.[60]
Each pair of workers has several local meetings in their field. The senior worker of the two has authority[specify] over his junior.[citation needed] Fortt (2010) quotes Caroll, “Old workers are responsible for helping young workers… It is not that you should rule over one another. We are not joined together by law but by love, and we need to be subject one to another.”[103]
Elders host local meetings and report[specify] to the workers.[citation needed]
Correspondence such as reporting, finances, and instructions are often communicated from local workers to regionally overseeing head workers, and from overseeing head workers to geographically overseeing workers.[276] The administration of the church and its annual process of assigning of workers to fields are rarely discussed among the membership.[196]
Organization
Members state that the church is not a formal organization.[277] There is no system of government in which members participate.[278] According to Johnston (1995), members “seem unaware that a system of government even exists.”[V] According to Elorreaga (2022), there is a clear chain of oversight system; members understand the oversight system and are familiar with local workers and overseers but may not know who the overseeing workers are in other regions of the world. [279]Although in the early years of the church a headquarters was maintained in Belfast,[106] no headquarters currently exist and the church remains largely unincorporated. Both expenditures and funds are not reported to the membership and no accounting is made public.[192] Funds are handled through stewardships, trusts, and cash transactions. Financial arrangements do not have fraudulent characteristics.[279] The church does not run any external outreach programs.[citation needed]
No materials are published by the church for outside circulation other than invitations to open Gospel meetings.[280] Printed materials are published for circulation among the members and include sermon notes, convention notes, Bible study lists, convention lists, and worker lists.[271] In recent years, contact details of members, including phone numbers and home addresses, have been compiled into booklets. These booklets are treated as highly confidential and available for workers' use only. Some members of the group refuse to provide their details for these booklets, in the name of privacy. Some members of the group see the internal dissemination of worker letters as continuing the practice of the early Church and the epistolary work of the original apostles.[281]
Hymnals
The church's first hymnal, The Go-Preacher's Hymn Book, was compiled by 1909[282] and contained 125 hymns. The English-language hymn book currently used is Hymns Old and New[254] and was first published in 1913[283] with several subsequent editions and translations. It contains 412 hymns, many of which were written or adapted by workers and other members of the church, and is organized into "gospel" and "fellowship" hymns.[284] A smaller, second hymnal, also titled Hymns Old and New, consists of the first 170 songs found in the full hymnal. Another version of the hymnal contains words without musical notation and is used primarily by children and those who cannot read music.[254] Hymnals in other languages, such as "Himnos" in Spanish, contain many hymns translated from the English and sung to the same tunes, as well as original non-English compositions.
See also
Endnotes
- The church does not publish any membership statistics; outside researchers give a wide range of estimates. In part, this depends on who is included as a member (children of members, unbaptized participants, lapsed members, etc) and whether the metric estimates are based upon known numbers of annual conventions, numbers of ministers, etc. One researcher has said that people on the fringes of church membership can be up to twenty times the number of regular members.(Hosfeld & 17 August 1983, pp. 1–2) During the 1980s, The Sydney Morning Herald gave an estimate of between 1 and 4 million members worldwide,(Gill & 30 June 1984, p. 37) while a 2001 estimate put Australian membership at 70,000.(Giles & 25 July 2001, p. 014) A sociology masters thesis from 1964 estimated U.S. membership at 300,000 to 500,000 and world membership as between 1 and 2 million.(Crow 1964, pp. 2, 16) Benton Johnson updated the metrics to arrive at a figure of 48,000 to 190,000 for the United States alone.(Johnson 1995, pp. 43–44) George Chryssides states that membership numbers are uncertain, giving an estimate for the United States during 1998 as ranging from 10,000 to 100,000 and a worldwide membership probably three times that figure.(Chryssides 2001b, pp. 330–331) The World Christian Encyclopedia shows the group in the United States growing from 100,000 in 1970 to 270,000 in 1990, while during the same period, Australian membership declined from 150,000 to 100,000.(Barrett, Kurian & Johnson 2001, pp. 85, 785) A 2022 source cited a worldwide decline of 38% in the number of ministers and up to a 40% decline in members since 1980.(Kropp-Ehrig 2022, p. 497) Figures from other sources fall within this same wide range.
- An ABC News report stated: "'In total, there were 87 files that were determined to be child sexual abuse material or sometimes known as child pornography,' Catherine Fu, a Maricopa Deputy County Attorney, told ABC News. 'The 10 charged files were a combination of photos and videos, and they were all depicting children under the age of 15 engaged in either exploitive exhibition or sexual conduct.' Zwiefelhofer, 61, maintains his innocence."(ABC 2024b).
- Collection refers to the donation money collected from a church congregation during a service, normally by means of a collection plate or box.
- John Long (1872–1962) traced his conversion experience to a mission held by Methodist evangelist Gabriel Clarke in 1890. He became a colporteur for the Methodists in Ireland, where he encountered William Irvine. He eventually joined Irvine's workers, until publicly expelled in 1907 for disagreeing with the group's exclusivist position (Robinson 2005, p. 36). Long returned to his work as a colporteur (Lennie 2009, p. 426) and joined the Elim evangelists for a time. From there he went on to become a noted Pentecostal preacher in Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England (Robinson 2005, p. 36). The editor of Heresies Exposed included a correction by Long of the name of the church's original leader and the year of its founding in 1897 (Irvine 2003, p. 73(fn)). He also left his memoirs (in journal form, though redacted many years later) (Long 1927).
- To view the complete 1910 article shown above, see here.
- The immigration record shows Irvine, Walker and Weir stating that they were joining a relative, "George McGregor" living at Coffey Street in Brooklyn New York (R.I.S. 2009a).
- "As early as 1912, Irvine was exercising his charismatic imagination in ways that must have been unsettling to those in the movement with an interest in routinization. In that year he told conventions that it might be possible to travel to the stars and act as saviours to them as Jesus acted for us. He spoke of Christ's imminent return and referred to his movement as the 144,000 mentioned in the Book of Revelation." —Benton Johnson (Johnson 1995, p. 50).
- "The workers declared that Irvine 'had lost the Lord's anointing' and banned him from all assemblies. But they also had to devise a new source of authority for the movement's very special brand of Christianity. They did this by an ingenious falsification of their own history, in which Irvine's role was obliterated. And armed with this new history and the unity to enforce a ban on Irvine, the workers declared that the founder's name was not to be mentioned within the movement. He was excised from the shared memory of the organization he had founded." —Johnson in Klass and Weisgrau (Johnson 1999, p. 378).
- For full text of the letter, see The Secret Sect (Parker & Parker 1982, pp. 117–119).
- This is the subject of letters from Rittenhouse and Sweetland, given in full in Reinventing the Truth (Daniel 1993, pp. 281, 283–284).
- "In very short order they also destroyed Irvine's earlier stature as a charismatic innovator by explaining that the sect he had founded was actually a collective rediscovery of the earliest form of Christianity, which had existed as small persecuted bands since the first century." —Benton Johnson (Johnson 1995, p. 50).
- "The Cooneyites, also called the Two-by-Two's, have developed the shunning of publicity into a fine art." —Melton (Melton 2009, p. 554).
- "Two by twos use the Bible as their sole source of authority and have developed no statement of belief apart from Scriptures. They practice the Lord's Supper (communion) weekly and practice believer's baptism, rebaptizing new members. Their lifestyle includes modesty of appearance, avoidance of worldly activities such as watching television, and usually pacificism." —George D. Chryssides (Chryssides 2001b, p. 330).
- "Members shun publicity, refuse to acquire church property, and issue no ministerial credentials or doctrinal literature, believing that the Bible (King James Version) is the only textbook and that, to be effective, the communication of spiritual life must take place orally, person to person. The only printed documents are hymnals." —J. Gordon Melton (Melton 2009, p. 554).
- "It appears that the sect's theological position on the divinity of Christ, the atonement, and man's justification before God, has never changed, yet at mission meetings and in private discussion with people whom they successfully proselytized, preachers gave the misleading impression that their church was evangelical, and that in no way did it deviate from basic Christian beliefs." —Doug Parker and Helen Parker (Parker & Parker 1982, pp. 102–193).
- Hymns which contained hints of salvation by grace, trinitarianism or redemption based upon the blood of Christ were purged or changed in a 1987 revision (Grey 2012, p. 55)
- "Moreover, no-names do not believe that Jesus's death on the cross will wash away the sins of all who accept him as their savior; salvation only comes through a life of sacrificial obedience to the instructions and examples of Jesus. All recent authorities agree that the road to salvation for these sectarians is a hard one. Carol Woster, who spent two years in the group, recalls that one long-time member she knew 'seemed to see life as a grieving journey, where after the [Sunday] meeting, the next day she would 'take up the struggle' to go on...' There is, she found, little 'Christian joy or confident hope' among the no-names." —Benton Johnson (Johnson 1995, p. 44).
- These terminology definitions follow Fortt 1994, pp. 15–202.
- This list of meeting types follows the list given in Daniel 1993, pp. 13–15.
- "Ordinary meetings among lay believers are held in houses, but periodically the itinerants visit each district, and there they borrow a hall (often the Church hall of an unsuspecting minister) for a preaching meeting for the public at large." —Bryan R. Wilson (Wilson 1993).
- "They [the ministers] are considered 'the word made flesh' in our day." —Christian Research Institute (C.R.I. & 13 April 2009).
- "A concern for public exposure may be the principal reason why the no-name sect has no newsletters or other publications even for its own members. The lack of such internal documents makes it difficult for members to know what is going on within the group, but, as Simmel observes, the less the members know, the less they will be able to tell outsiders if they decide to talk openly about it. The need for internal secrecy also may explain why the nameless sect has no system of government in which ordinary members participate. I[n] fact, most members seem unaware that a system of government even exists.." —Benton Johnson (Johnson 1995, p. 43).
Footnotes
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads