Warren Norman (psychologist)

Warren T. Norman (1930–1998)^[1] was a psychologist recognized for his impact on personality psychology, particularly in shaping the Five-Factor Model (FFM), also known as Norman's "Big 5". These dimensions, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience, are foundational aspects of contemporary personality theory.

Biography

Norman earned his academic degrees from the University of Minnesota, obtaining a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics and Natural Science in 1952, a Master of Arts in Statistics and Educational Psychology in 1955, and culminating with a Ph.D. in Psychology in 1957.

His professional journey primarily unfolded at the University of Michigan. As the Head of the Department of Psychology and Chairman of the University Senate, Norman contributed to numerous psychological associations and editorial boards.

Contributions to psychology

Norman's contributions included:

• Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Norman's influential work, notably "Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes," laid the groundwork for comprehending and categorizing personality traits. This study was instrumental in shaping the Five Factor Model by identifying consistent patterns in how individuals rated each other's personalities.^[2]
• Personality Trait Descriptors: He meticulously documented personality traits, presenting an extensive list of characteristics specifically tailored for academic settings in the publication "2800 Personality Trait Descriptors." This resource facilitated a better understanding of individual differences in personality traits.
• Universal Personality Dimensions: Norman's study, "Personality dimensions in several groups," expanded insights into universal personality traits across diverse societal contexts. It showcased the applicability of the Five Factor Model in understanding behavior within different societal groups.
• Critique on Human Diversity: In his critical review, "Human Diversity and Social Order," Norman challenged prevailing personality theories, advocating for a conceptual framework that recognized human diversity within social structures. This critique prompted reevaluations in the field, highlighting the importance of cultural variations in personality assessment and theory.