Frank v. Gaos
2019 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Frank v. Gaos?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Frank v. Gaos, 586 U.S. ___ (2019), was a per curiam decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in a case concerning the practice of cy pres settlements in class action lawsuits. Following oral argument, the court asked the parties to submit supplemental briefs addressing whether the parties had Article III standing to pursue the case in federal courts. Supplemental briefing was completed on December 21, 2018. On March 20, 2019, the court remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit to address the plaintiffs’ standing in light of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.[1]
![]() | This article needs to be updated. (February 2022) |
Quick Facts Frank v. Gaos, Argued October 31, 2018 Decided March 20, 2019 ...
Frank v. Gaos | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued October 31, 2018 Decided March 20, 2019 | |
Full case name | Theodore H. Frank, et al. v. Paloma Gaos, et al. |
Docket no. | 17-961 |
Citations | 586 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 1041; 203 L. Ed. 2d 404 |
Case history | |
Prior | In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litig., 87 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (N.D. Cal. 2015); affirmed, 869 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 1697 (2018). |
Holding | |
The case is remanded for the courts below to address the plaintiffs’ standing in light of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Per curiam | |
Dissent | Thomas |
Close