Oligarchy
Form of government with small ruling class From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oligarchy (from Ancient Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía) 'rule by few'; from ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few' and ἄρχω (árkhō) 'to rule, command')[1][2][3] is a form of government in which power rests with a small number of people. These people may or may not be distinguished by one or several characteristics, such as nobility, fame, wealth, education, or corporate, religious, political, or military control.
Throughout history, power structures considered to be oligarchies have often been viewed as coercive, relying on public obedience or oppression to exist. Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as meaning rule by the rich, contrasting it with aristocracy, arguing that oligarchy was a perversion of aristocracy.[4]
Types
Summarize
Perspective
Minority rule
The consolidation of power by a dominant religious or ethnic minority can be considered a form of oligarchy.[5] Examples include South Africa during apartheid, Liberia under Americo-Liberians, the Sultanate of Zanzibar,[citation needed] and Rhodesia. In these cases, oligarchic rule was often tied to the legacy of colonialism.[5]
In the early 20th century, Robert Michels expanded on this idea in his iron law of oligarchy, arguing that even democracies, like all large organizations, tend to become oligarchic due to the necessity of dividing labor, which ultimately results in a ruling class focused on maintaining its power.[6][7]
Putative oligarchies
Business groups may be considered oligarchies if they meet the following criteria:
- They are the largest private owners in the country.
- They possess sufficient political power to influence their own interests.
- The owners control multiple businesses, coordinating activities across sectors.[8]
Intellectual oligarchies
George Bernard Shaw coined the concept of an intellectual oligarchy in his play Major Barbara (1907). In the play, Shaw criticizes the control of society by intellectual elites and expresses a desire for the empowerment of the common people:[9]
I now want to give the common man weapons against the intellectual man. I love the common people. I want to arm them against the lawyer, the doctor, the priest, the literary man, the professor, the artist, and the politician, who, once in authority, is the most dangerous, disastrous, and tyrannical of all the fools, rascals, and impostors. I want a democratic power strong enough to force the intellectual oligarchy to use its genius for the general good or else perish.
History
Summarize
Perspective
Ancient Greece
The Ancient Greek word oligarchia is used by historians of Ancient Greece to describe the position of the Eupatridae, the aristocratic elite, of the city-state of Athens prior to the Athenian Revolution of 508–507 BC, which began Athenian democracy.[10] Although the citizens tolerated the oligarchy for decades, the involvement of the hated Spartans in the defense of Athens led some of the influential elite to defect to supporting democracy. Reaction against Spartan hegemony also made several oligarchies in the Peloponnese into democracies.[11] However, the elite soon came into conflict with the people, or demos, specifically in Aegina, Syracuse, and Naxos in the 500s and 490s BC.[12] Soon many city-states had settled into a fairly constant system of rule by the rich, with the demos being used periodically by the weaker party and otherwise being out of power.[13] Many nominally democratic Greek city-states, despite frequent revolt by the demos, remained firmly controlled the wealthy elite, who spurned attempts to allow commoners into power.[14]
Athens ended complete rule by the rich in 493 BC, when a commoner named Themistocles became archon. He ruled Athens for over twenty years, and is best known as the victor of the Greco-Persian Wars.[15] When Themistocles fell, the Areopagus, an aristocratic council which was formerly the most powerful body in Athens, began to gain more prominence, spearheaded by conservative and anti-democratic politician Cimon. In 461 BC, politician Ephialtes, who supported radical democracy proposed a law to limit its powers, which the Ecclesia passed unanimously. Its function was supplanted by the boule.[16] Cimon was ostracized for ten years by Ephialtes and his supporters.[17] However, Ephialtes was assassinated in 461 BC, possibly by the aristocrats.[18]
By country
Summarize
Perspective
Jeffrey A. Winters and Benjamin I. Page have described Colombia, Indonesia, Russia, Singapore and the United States as oligarchies.[19]
The Philippines
During the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos from 1965 to 1986, several monopolies arose in the Philippines, primarily linked to the Marcos family and their close associates. Analysts have described this period, and even subsequent decades, as an era of oligarchy in the Philippines.[20][21][22][23]
President Rodrigo Duterte, elected in 2016, promised to dismantle the oligarchy during his presidency.[24][23] However, corporate oligarchy persisted throughout his tenure. While Duterte criticized prominent tycoons such as the Ayalas and Manny Pangilinan, corporate figures allied with Duterte, including Dennis Uy of Udenna Corporation, benefitted during his administration.[25]
Russia
Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the subsequent privatization of state-owned assets, a class of Russian oligarchs emerged. These oligarchs gained control of significant portions of the economy, especially in the energy, metals, and natural resources sectors.[26] Many of these individuals maintained close ties with government officials, particularly the president, leading some to characterize modern Russia as an oligarchy intertwined with the state.[27]
Iran
The Islamic Republic of Iran, established after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, is sometimes described as a clerical oligarchy. Its ruling system, known as Velayat-e-Faqih (Governance of the Jurists), places power in the hands of a small group of high-ranking Shia clerics, led by the Supreme Leader. This group holds significant influence over the country's legislative, military, and economic affairs, and critics argue that this system concentrates power in a religious elite, marginalizing other voices within society.[28][29]
Ukraine
Since Ukraine's independence in 1991, a powerful class of business elites, known as Ukrainian oligarchs, has played a significant role in the country's politics and economy. These oligarchs gained control of state assets during the rapid privatization that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union.[8] President Leonid Kuchma's multi-vector policy, which favored close relations with both the West and Russia, was seen as appeasing both groups' oligarchical business interests.[30] In 2021, Ukraine passed a law aimed at curbing oligarchic influence on politics and the economy.[7][31]
United States
Several commentators and scholars have suggested that the United States demonstrates characteristics of an oligarchy, particularly in relation to the concentration of wealth and political influence among a small elite,[32][33][34][35][36] as exemplified by the list of top donors to political parties.[37][38][39]
Economist Simon Johnson argued that the rise of an American financial oligarchy became particularly prominent following the 2008 financial crisis.[40] This financial elite has been described as wielding significant power over both the economy and political decisions. Former President Jimmy Carter in 2015 characterized the United States as an "oligarchy with unlimited political bribery" following the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision, which removed limits on donations to political campaigns.[41]
In 2014, a study by political scientists Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University argued that the United States' political system does not primarily reflect the preferences of its average citizens. Their analysis of policy outcomes between 1981 and 2002 suggested that wealthy individuals and business groups held substantial influence over political decisions, often sidelining the majority of Americans.[42] While the United States maintains democratic features such as regular elections, freedom of speech, and widespread suffrage, the study noted that policy decisions are disproportionately influenced by economic elites.[43] However, the study received criticism from other scholars, who argued that the influence of average citizens should not be discounted and that the conclusions about oligarchic tendencies were overstated.[44] Gilens and Page defended their research, reiterating that while they do not label the United States an outright oligarchy, they found substantial evidence of economic elites dominating certain areas of policy-making.[45]
In his presidential farewell address on January 15, 2025, outgoing U.S. President Joe Biden warned that an oligarchy was taking shape in America which threatened democracy, basic rights, and freedom, aided by a tech–industrial complex.[46][47] Businessman Elon Musk, a close collaborator of Donald Trump during his 2024 campaign and head of the Department of Government Efficiency, has been described as an oligarch due to his extensive influence on Trump during his second presidency.[48][49][50][51][52][53] Musk contributed over $200 million into the 2024 election, creating a "super" PAC to promote Trump's campaign.[54][55][56]
See also
References
Further reading
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.