Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Social Gospel

Social movement From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

The Social Gospel is a social movement within Protestantism that aims to apply Christian ethics to social problems, especially issues of social justice such as economic inequality, poverty, alcoholism, crime, racial tensions, slums, unclean environment, child labor, lack of unionization, poor schools, and the dangers of war. It was most prominent in the early 20th-century United States and Canada.

Theologically, proponents of the movement emphasized living out the line from the Lord's Prayer (Matthew 6:10): 'Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven,' interpreting it as a call to address societal injustices.[1] They typically were postmillennialist and believed the Second Coming could not happen until humankind rid itself of social evils by human effort.[a] The Social Gospel was more popular among clergy than churches.[2] Its leaders were predominantly associated with the liberal wing of the progressive movement and most were theologically liberal, although a few were also conservative when it came to their views on social issues.[3] Washington Gladden and Walter Rauschenbusch were the two major founders of the movement.[4]

Remove ads

History

Summarize
Perspective

The term Social Gospel was first used by Charles Oliver Brown in reference to Henry George's 1879 treatise Progress and Poverty, which sparked the single tax movement.

The Social Gospel affected much of Protestant America. The Presbyterians described their goals in 1910 by proclaiming:

The great ends of the church are the proclamation of the gospel for the salvation of humankind; the shelter, nurture, and spiritual fellowship of the children of God; the maintenance of divine worship; the preservation of truth; the promotion of social righteousness; and the exhibition of the Kingdom of Heaven to the world.

In the late 19th century, many Protestants were disgusted by the poverty level and the low quality of living in the slums. The social gospel movement provided a religious rationale for action to address those concerns. Activists in the Social Gospel movement hoped that, if by public measures as well as enforced schooling, the poor could develop talents and skills, causing the quality of their moral lives to improve. Important concerns of the Social Gospel movement were labor reforms such as abolishing child labor and regulating the hours of work by mothers. By 1920, they were crusading against the 12-hour day for workers at U.S. Steel.

Early Reform Priorities

In the late nineteenth century, many Protestants were distressed by the poverty and poor living conditions in urban slums.[5] The Social Gospel movement provided a religious rationale for addressing these issues. Activists believed that through public measures and compulsory schooling, the poor could develop skills that would improve their moral and economic prospects.[6] Major concerns included abolishing child labor and regulating the working hours of mothers. By 1920, reformers were campaigning against the 12-hour day for workers at U.S. Steel.[7]

Scholars note that these priorities reflected a growing belief that social environments shaped behavior and that Christian ethics required addressing structural causes of poverty, workplace dangers, and poor sanitation.[8] Reformers increasingly connected public health measures, city planning, and housing inspections to broader moral obligations within Protestant thought.[9]

Public Health and Urban Conditions

As the movement expanded, its reform agenda came to include support for juvenile courts, compulsory education, and early labor legislation aimed at improving conditions for working families.[10]

Social Gospel leaders argued that social problems required coordinated civic action, maintaining that improved neighborhoods, safer working conditions, and reliable access to basic services were essential to moral and communal well-being.[11]

Racial Boundaries and Black Social Christianity

The movement’s reach varied significantly across racial lines. Many white Social Gospel advocates primarily addressed the needs of European immigrants and industrial workers, often overlooking structural inequities affecting African Americans.[12]

In response, Black churches and reformers developed their own expressions of social Christianity emphasizing racial justice, education, and community uplift.[13]

Historians note that these parallel movements broadened the overall reform landscape while also exposing racial limitations within many white-led Social Gospel efforts.[14]

Washington Gladden

Washington Gladden (1836–1918) was an American Congregational clergyman. His words and actions earned him the title of "a pioneer" of the Social Gospel even before the term came into use. Gladden spoke up for workers and their right to organize unions.[15]

For Gladden, the "Christian law covers every relation of life" including the relationship between employers and their employees.[16] His 1877 book The Christian Way: Whither It Leads and How to Go On was his first national call for such a universal application of Christian values in everyday life. The book began his leadership in the Social Gospel movement.[17] Historians consider Gladden to be one of the Social Gospel movement's "founding fathers".[18]

Walter Rauschenbusch (1861–1918)

Another of the defining theologians for the Social Gospel movement was Walter Rauschenbusch, a Baptist pastor of the Second German Baptist Church in Hell's Kitchen, New York City.[19]

In 1892, Rauschenbusch and several other leading writers and advocates of the Social Gospel formed a group called the Brotherhood of the Kingdom.[20] Pastors and leaders will join the organization to debate and implement the social gospel.[21]

In 1907, he published the book Christianity and the Social Crisis, which would influence the actions of several actors of the social gospel.[22] His work may be "the finest distillation of social gospel thought."[23] Rauschenbusch railed against what he regarded as the selfishness of capitalism and promoted instead a form of Christian socialism that supported the creation of labor unions and cooperative economics.[24]

A Theology for the Social Gospel (1917)

The social gospel movement was not a unified and well-focused movement, for it contained members who disagreed with the conclusions of others within the movement.[25] Rauschenbusch stated that the movement needed "a theology to make it effective" and likewise, "theology needs the social gospel to vitalize it."[26] In A Theology for the Social Gospel (1917), Rauschenbusch takes up the task of creating "a systematic theology large enough to match [our social gospel] and vital enough to back it."[26] He believed that the social gospel would be "a permanent addition to our spiritual outlook and that its arrival constitutes a state in the development of the Christian religion",[27] and thus a systematic tool for using it was necessary.

In A Theology for the Social Gospel, Rauschenbusch states that the individualistic gospel has made sinfulness of the individual clear, but it has not shed light on institutionalized sinfulness: "It has not evoked faith in the will and power of God to redeem the permanent institutions of human society from their inherited guilt of oppression and extortion."[28] This ideology would be inherited by liberation theologians and civil rights advocates and leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr.

The "Kingdom of God" is crucial to Rauschenbusch's proposed theology of the social gospel. He states that the ideology and doctrine of "the Kingdom of God," of which Jesus Christ reportedly "always spoke"[29] has been gradually replaced by that of the Church. This was done at first by the early church out of what appeared to be necessity, but Rauschenbusch calls Christians to return to the doctrine of "the Kingdom of God."[30] Of course, such a replacement has cost theology and Christians at large a great deal: the way we view Jesus and the synoptic gospels, the ethical principles of Jesus, and worship rituals have all been affected by this replacement.[31] In promoting a return to the doctrine of the "Kingdom of God", he clarified that the "Kingdom of God": is not subject to the pitfalls of the Church; it can test and correct the Church; is a prophetic, future-focused ideology and a revolutionary, social and political force that understands all creation to be sacred; and it can help save the problematic, sinful social order.[32]

In this book, he explains that Christians must be like the Almighty who became man in Jesus Christ, who was with everyone equally and considered people as a subject of love and service.[33]

Settlement movement

Settlement Houses

Many reformers inspired by the Social Gospel opened settlement houses, most notably Hull House in Chicago, operated by Jane Addams.[34] These institutions assisted poor and immigrant families by offering daycare, education, and health services in urban slum neighborhoods.[35]

The YMCA, originally created to help rural youth adapt to city life while maintaining their religious faith, had become an important institution of the Social Gospel by the 1890s.[36] Many denominations, including Catholics, participated in foreign missions that incorporated Social Gospel principles related to medical and social uplift.[37] Black denominations such as the AME and AMEZ also supported Social Gospel priorities in their institutional programs.[38] Evangelical and liturgical groups took part in these efforts, though pietistic denominations were especially active in supporting Prohibition.[39]

Settlement workers expanded the Social Gospel's influence by documenting unsafe housing, inadequate sanitation, and public health hazards through home visits and neighborhood surveys.[40] Their findings shaped municipal reforms such as playground construction, garbage collection systems, and the creation of school nursing and public health clinics.[41]

Women and Social Reform

Women played a major role in settlement work. Figures such as Jane Addams and Florence Kelley used settlement houses to develop social programs that included vocational training, evening classes, immigrant support services, childcare, and legal advocacy for women and children.[42] Their activism advanced child labor legislation, factory inspection systems, and the early juvenile justice movement.[43]

Black Settlement Work

In Black communities, women’s reform networks in AME and AMEZ churches created educational programs, mutual aid societies, and social welfare initiatives that addressed racial discrimination and segregated housing conditions.[44] Scholars argue that these adaptations of Social Gospel ideas broadened the movement’s reach and highlighted inequities within many white-led reform efforts.[45]

Remove ads

Progressives

Summarize
Perspective

Urban Reform in the West

Before the First World War, the Social Gospel served as the religious dimension of the Progressive movement, addressing injustice, poverty, and urban social problems.[46] Denver, Colorado, emerged as a significant center of Social Gospel activism. Thomas Uzzel led the Methodist People's Tabernacle from 1885 to 1910, establishing a medical dispensary, employment bureau, summer camp for children, night school programs, and English classes for immigrants.[47]

Myron Reed of the First Congregational Church supported labor unions on issues such as worker compensation before leaving to form a nondenominational congregation when his activism generated controversy within his middle-class church.[48] Jim Goodhart, a Baptist minister, created an employment bureau, operated a mission that provided food and lodging to people experiencing homelessness, and later served as Denver’s director of public welfare.[49] Reform Jews and Catholics also contributed to Denver’s expanding social welfare network.[50]

The Social Gospel’s role in cities like Denver paralleled broader national patterns in which religious reformers worked with civic leaders to address the consequences of industrialization.[51] Activists promoted municipal sanitation, access to health services, and early consumer protection programs. Their involvement brought moral arguments into public debates on housing regulations, corruption, and public utilities.[52]

Mark A. Matthews and Seattle Reform

Mark A. Matthews of Seattle’s First Presbyterian Church became a prominent urban reformer. He investigated vice districts, criticized local political corruption, and built a large and multifunctional congregation that offered night schools, childcare, employment assistance, and public health programs.[53] In 1912 he was elected national moderator of the Presbyterian Church and became one of the most influential Social Gospel leaders in the Pacific Northwest.[54]

Historians note that Matthews and similar reformers viewed civic involvement as an extension of religious responsibility.[55] Initiatives such as workplace safety protections, public playgrounds, and compulsory schooling became influential components of later social policy.[56]

Southern Expressions

The American South developed its own expressions of the Social Gospel, closely tied to Prohibition and broader moral reform campaigns.[57] Reformers sought to protect young wage-earning women and opposed activities they regarded as morally harmful, including swearing, boxing, and animal fighting.[58] Beginning in 1886, Methodist women’s missionary societies expanded roles in education and social welfare, helping to establish orphanages, schools, and community programs.[59] By 1900, even conservative white Baptists supported reforms related to temperance, public morality, and anti-corruption efforts.[60]

Scholars argue that Southern expressions of the Social Gospel adapted national reform ideas to regional social structures shaped by gender norms, racial inequality, and local moral concerns.[61] Although constrained by segregation, women’s organizations contributed significantly to early social service networks across the region.[62]

New Deal

During the New Deal of the 1930s, Social Gospel themes could be seen in the work of Harry Hopkins, Will Alexander, and Mary McLeod Bethune, who added a new concern with African Americans. After 1940, the movement lessened, but it was invigorated in the 1950s by black leaders like Baptist minister Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement.[citation needed] After 1980, it weakened again as a major force inside mainstream churches; indeed, those churches were losing strength.[citation needed]

Examples of the Social Gospel's continued influence can still be found in Jim Wallis's Sojourners organization's Call to Renewal and more local organizations like the Virginia Interfaith Center.[citation needed] Another modern example can be found in the work of John Steinbruck, senior pastor of Luther Place Memorial Church in Washington, DC, from 1970 to 1997, who was an articulate and passionate preacher of the Social Gospel and a leading voice locally and nationally for the homeless, Central American refugees, and victims of persecution and prejudice.

Social Gospel and Labor Movements

Because the Social Gospel was primarily concerned with the day-to-day life of laypeople, one of the ways in which it made its message heard was through labor movements. Particularly, the Social Gospel had a profound effect upon the American Federation of Labor (AFL). The AFL began a movement called Labor Forward, which was a pro-Christian group who "preached unionization like a revival."[63] In Philadelphia, this movement was counteracted by bringing revivalist Billy Sunday, himself firmly anti-union, who believed "that the organized shops destroyed individual freedom."[63]

Legacy of the Social Gospel

The Social Gospel movement peaked in the early 20th century, but scholars debate over when the movement began to decline, with some asserting that the destruction and trauma caused by the First World War left many disillusioned with the Social Gospel's ideals[64] while others argue that the war stimulated the Social Gospelers' reform efforts.[65] Theories regarding the decline of the Social Gospel after the First World War often cite the rise of neo-orthodoxy as a contributing factor in the movement's decline.[66]

While the Social Gospel was short-lived historically, it had a lasting impact on the policies of most of the mainline denominations in the United States. Most began programs for social reform, which led to ecumenical cooperation in 1910 while in the formation of the Federal Council of Churches. Although this cooperation was about social issues that often led to charges of socialism.[63] It is likely that the Social Gospel's strong sense of leadership by the people led to women's suffrage, and that the emphasis it placed on morality led to prohibition.[63] Biographer Randall Woods argues that Social Gospel themes learned from childhood allowed Lyndon B. Johnson to transform social problems into moral problems. This helps explain his longtime commitment to social justice, as exemplified by the Great Society and his commitment to racial equality. The Social Gospel explicitly inspired his foreign-policy approach to a sort of Christian internationalism and nation building.[67]

The Social Gospel Movement has been described as "the most distinctive American contribution to world Christianity."[18]

The Social Gospel, after 1945, influenced the formation of Christian democracy political ideology among Protestants and Catholics in Europe.[68][b] Many of the Social Gospel's ideas also reappeared in the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. "Social Gospel" principles continue to inspire newer movements such as Christians Against Poverty.[69]

Reinhold Niebuhr has argued that the 20th century history of Western democracies has not vindicated the optimistic view of human nature which the social gospelers shared with the Enlightenment.[70] Labor historians argue that the movement had little influence on the labor movement, and attribute that failure to professional elitism and a lack of understanding of the collective nature of the movement. Labor did not reject social gospellers because they were unaware of them but, rather, because their tactics and ideas were considered inadequate.[71]

Paul Lubienecki wrote that "contrary to analysis of some historians the historical evidence demonstrated that the [Social Gospel] Movement failed in its campaign to be the leading voice of the worker and to convert the urban immigrant masses".[72] Lubieniecki notes that social gospel appealed predominantly to the white American Protestant middle-class and ultimately related more with the middle class than with the working class.[73] Social gospel ministers did not connect to the struggling ethnic urban poor, and social gospel congregations would often relocate their parish into well-off neighborhoods, abandoning poor districts. This resulted in the Catholic parishes being established in working class areas instead.[74] Lubieniecki also argued that the social gospel movement limited its appeal because of anti-Catholicism and antisemitism - Rauschenbusch stated that social concerns could not be sufficiently addressed by non-Protestants, and regarded Catholicism as inherently anti-democratic and contrary to the American values of individual liberty. Likewise, some social gospel ministers believed that Jews and Catholics threatened the American social order.[72]

Post-World War I Debates

The Social Gospel movement reached its height in the early twentieth century, but scholars disagree about when and why it began to decline. Some historians argue that the destruction and trauma of the First World War led many supporters to lose confidence in the movement’s optimistic outlook.[75] Others contend that the war encouraged renewed Social Gospel activism, especially within newer reform networks.[76] Many scholars identify the rise of neo-orthodoxy as a contributing factor in the movement’s waning influence after the war.[77]

The violence of the First World War challenged the Social Gospel’s belief in steady moral progress. Theologians such as Reinhold Niebuhr criticized its optimistic assumptions about human nature and argued that social reform required a more realistic assessment of human limitations.[78] Despite these critiques, many Social Gospel-inspired reforms continued at the local and denominational level through church agencies and civic organizations.[79] Scholars note that debates from this period prompted later religious thinkers to refine discussions of institutional sin, social ethics, and the relationship between Christian faith and public responsibility.[80]

Influence on American Social Policy

Although the Social Gospel declined as a unified movement, historians widely agree that it shaped the development of social reform within mainline Protestant denominations.[81] These denominations increasingly endorsed public welfare initiatives and participated in ecumenical collaboration through organizations such as the Federal Council of Churches, founded in 1910.[82] Critics at the time often described such efforts as aligned with socialism.[83]

Some scholars argue that the Social Gospel’s emphasis on civic participation influenced early twentieth-century democratic movements, including women’s suffrage and prohibition activism.[84] Biographer Randall Woods asserts that Social Gospel values shaped Lyndon B. Johnson’s understanding of social responsibility, informing his commitment to Great Society legislation and civil rights reforms.[85] Historians also identify Social Gospel themes in Johnson’s foreign policy, particularly his framework of Christian internationalism.[86]

Scholars maintain that the Social Gospel’s legacy remains visible in the development of federal social welfare programs, religious activism in mid-twentieth-century civil rights efforts, and ongoing advocacy for economic justice.[87] Its emphasis on structural inequality informed later antipoverty policy debates, while its ecumenical orientation supported the growth of national faith-based social justice organizations.[88]

Civil Rights Legacy and Public Theology

The Social Gospel influenced twentieth-century public theology and played a role in shaping the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr. frequently drew upon the writings of Walter Rauschenbusch and Washington Gladden, linking their focus on social justice to mid-century struggles for racial equality and economic rights.[89] Scholars argue that these connections helped mold broader debates about democracy, human dignity, and moral responsibility in American public life.[90]

Church historians have described the Social Gospel as "the most distinctive American contribution to world Christianity."[91]

Remove ads

Canada

Summarize
Perspective

The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation, a political party that was later reformulated as the New Democratic Party, was founded on social gospel principles in the 1930s by J. S. Woodsworth, a Methodist minister, and Alberta MP William Irvine. Woodsworth wrote extensively about the social gospel from experiences gained while working with immigrant slum dwellers in Winnipeg from 1904 to 1913. His writings called for the Kingdom of God "here and now".[92] This political party took power in the province of Saskatchewan in 1944. This group, led by Tommy Douglas, a Baptist minister, introduced universal medicare, family allowance and old age pensions.[93] This political party has since largely lost its religious basis, and became a secular social democratic party. The Social Service Council (SSC) was the "reforming arm of Protestantism in Canada", and promoted idea of the social gospel.[94] Under the "aggressive leadership of Charlotte Whitton", the Canadian Council of Child Welfare, opposed "a widening of social security protection..." and "continued to impede the implementation of provincial mothers' pensions", instead pressing for the "traditional private charity" model.[95] Charlotte Whitton argued that children should be removed from their homes "instead of paying money to needy parents"[96] Charlotte Whitton, as Christie and Gauvreau point out, was also a member of the SSC,[97] The SSC's mandate included the "intensive Christian conquest of Canada".[98]

The Social Gospel was a significant influence in the formation of the People's Church in Brandon, Manitoba, in 1919. Started by Methodist minister A. E. Smith, the People's Church attempted to provide an alternative to the traditional church, which Smith viewed as unconcerned with social issues. In his autobiography All My Life Smith describes his last sermon before starting the People's Church, saying "The Church was afraid it might give offense to the rich and powerful."[99] The People's Church was successful for a time, with People's Churches founded in Vancouver, Victoria, Edmonton, and Calgary.[100] In Winnipeg, Methodist minister and Social Gospeler William Ivens started another workers church, the "Labor Church," in 1918.[101] Both Smith and Ivens tried to take leaves of absence from their Methodist ministries, which were initially granted. Upon a decision to bring all such special cases before the Methodist Stationing Committee, however, the decisions were rescinded.

Prairie Reform Networks

In Canada, the Social Gospel developed in close relationship with labor activism, agrarian protest, and regional economic reform, particularly in the Prairie provinces.[102] Ministers and lay leaders used Social Gospel ideas to critique economic inequality, monopolistic business practices, and the hardships experienced by immigrant and farming communities.[103] Scholars argue that these reform networks helped shape the emerging political culture of Western Canada, where religious activism and economic reform movements frequently overlapped.[104]

Workers’ and People’s Churches

The Social Gospel had a significant influence on the creation of the People's Church in Brandon, Manitoba, founded in 1919 by Methodist minister A. E. Smith.[105] In his autobiography, Smith described his frustration with the established church’s unwillingness to confront social issues.[106] Additional People's Churches were created in Vancouver, Victoria, Edmonton, and Calgary.[107]

In Winnipeg, Methodist minister William Ivens founded the Labor Church in 1918.[108] Although Smith and Ivens initially secured permission to take leave from their Methodist ministries, the Methodist Stationing Committee later reversed the decision.[109]

Historians note that these churches played important roles in worker organization, community welfare, and democratic participation during significant social and economic change.[110]

Development of Social Welfare Programs

Canadian expressions of the Social Gospel also addressed public health, temperance, and educational reform.[111] While these efforts frequently reflected the concerns of Anglo-Protestant communities, scholars argue that they contributed to early discussions about universal health care, expanded public schooling, and state-supported welfare programs.[112]

Many historians conclude that Social Gospel advocacy helped influence the development of Canada's modern social safety net.[113]

Remove ads

In literature

The Social Gospel theme is reflected in the novels In His Steps (1897) and The Reformer (1902) by the Congregational minister Charles Sheldon, who coined the motto "What would Jesus do?" In his personal life, Sheldon was committed to Christian socialism and identified strongly with the Social Gospel movement. Walter Rauschenbusch, one of the leading early theologians of the Social Gospel in the United States, indicated that his theology had been inspired by Sheldon's novels.

Members of the Brotherhood of the Kingdom produced many of the written works that defined the theology of the Social Gospel movement and gave it public prominence.[21] These included Walter Rauschenbusch's Christianity and the Social Crisis (1907) and Christianizing the Social Order (1912), as well as Samuel Zane Batten's The New Citizenship (1898) and The Social Task of Christianity (1911).

Remove ads

21st century

In the United States, the Social Gospel is still influential in liberal Protestantism.[114][115][116] Social Gospel elements can also be found in many agencies associated with Protestant denominations and the Catholic Church in the United States.[citation needed]

See also

Remove ads

Notes

Summarize
Perspective
  1. They rejected premillennialist theology, which held the Second Coming of Christ was imminent, and Christians should devote their energies to preparing for it rather than addressing the issue of social evils.
  2. John Witte Jr. wrote:
    Concurrent with this missionary movement in Africa, both Protestant and Catholic political activists helped to restore democracy to war-torn Europe and extend it overseas. Protestant political activism emerged principally in France, the Lowlands, and Scandinavia under the inspiration of both social gospel movements and neo-Calvinism. Catholic political activism emerged principally in Italy, France, and Spain under the inspiration of both Rerum Novarum and its early progeny and of neo-Thomism. Both formed political parties, which now fall under the general egis of the Christian Democratic Party movement.

    Both Protestant and Catholic parties inveighed against the reductionist extremes and social failures of liberal democracies and social democracies. Liberal democracies, they believed, had sacrificed the community for the individual; social democracies had sacrificed the individual for the community. Both parties returned to a traditional Christian teaching of "social pluralism" or "subsidiarity," which stressed the dependence and participation of the individual in family, church, school, business, and other associations. Both parties stressed the responsibility of the state to respect and protect the "individual in community."[68]

Remove ads

References

Bibliography

Further reading

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads