Columbia River

For rivers in Colombia, see List of rivers of Colombia.

The Columbia River (Upper Chinook: Wimahl or Wimal; Sahaptin: Nch’i-Wàna or Nchi wana; Sinixt dialect swah'netk'qhu) is the largest river in the Pacific Northwest region of North America.^[14] The river forms in the Rocky Mountains of British Columbia, Canada. It flows northwest and then south into the U.S. state of Washington, then turns west to form most of the border between Washington and the state of Oregon before emptying into the Pacific Ocean. The river is 1,243 mi (2,000 km) long, and its largest tributary is the Snake River. Its drainage basin is roughly the size of France and extends into seven states of the United States and one Canadian province. The fourth-largest river in the United States by flow,^{[note 1]} the Columbia has the greatest flow of any river into the eastern Pacific and the 36th greatest discharge of any river in the world.

Columbia River
Columbia River from Rowena Crest with Interstate 84 on the right
Columbia River drainage basin
Etymology	Captain Robert Gray's ship, Columbia Rediviva
Nickname(s)	Big River, the River of the West, River Oregon[1]
Native name	Wimahl (Chinook) Nchʼi-Wàna (Yakama) swahʼnetkʼqhu (Sinixt)[2]
Location
Country	United States, Canada
State	Washington, Oregon
Province	British Columbia
Cities	Revelstoke, BC, Castlegar, BC, Trail, BC, Wenatchee, WA, East Wenatchee, WA, Tri-Cities, WA, The Dalles, OR, Hood River, OR, Portland, OR, Vancouver, WA, Longview, WA, Astoria, OR
Physical characteristics
Source	Columbia Lake
• location	British Columbia, Canada
• coordinates	50°13′35″N 115°51′05″W[3]
• elevation	2,690 ft (820 m)[4]
Mouth	Pacific Ocean, at Clatsop County, Oregon / Pacific County, Washington
• coordinates	46°14′39″N 124°3′29″W[5]
• elevation	0 ft (0 m)
Length	1,243 mi (2,000 km)[6]
Basin size	258,000 sq mi (670,000 km2)
Discharge
• location	Astoria (near mouth)
• average	(Period: 1951–1980)265,000 cu ft/s (7,500 m3/s)[7][8][9] (Period: 1969–2023)234,700 cu ft/s (6,650 m3/s)[7]
Discharge
• location	Port Westward
• average	(Period: 1969–2023)233,700 cu ft/s (6,620 m3/s)[10]
• minimum	63,600 cu ft/s (1,800 m3/s)(Year: 2001)[10]
• maximum	864,000 cu ft/s (24,500 m3/s)(Year: 1996)[10]
Discharge
• location	The Dalles
• average	(Period: 1879–2023)188,500 cu ft/s (5,340 m3/s)[11]
• minimum	12,100 cu ft/s (340 m3/s)(Year: 1968)[7]
• maximum	1,240,000 cu ft/s (35,000 m3/s)(Year: 1894)[7]
Discharge
• location	Priest Rapids Dam
• average	(1960–2023)118,200 cu ft/s (3,350 m3/s)[12]
• minimum	36,400 cu ft/s (1,030 m3/s)(Year: 1962)[12]
• maximum	533,000 cu ft/s (15,100 m3/s)(Year: 1961)[12]
Discharge
• location	United States and Canada international boundary
• average	(Period: 1938– 2023)99,300 cu ft/s (2,810 m3/s)[13]
• minimum	21,200 cu ft/s (600 m3/s)(Year: 1944)[13]
• maximum	550,000 cu ft/s (16,000 m3/s)(Year: 1948)[13]
Basin features
Progression	Pacific Ocean
River system	Columbia River
Tributaries
• left	Spillimacheen River, Beaver River, Illecillewaet River, Incomappleux River, Kootenay River, Pend Oreille River, Spokane River, Crab Creek, Snake River, John Day River, Deschutes River, Willamette River
• right	Kicking Horse River, Blaeberry River, Canoe River, Kettle River, Sanpoil River, Okanogan River, Entiat River, Wenatchee River, Yakima River, Lewis River, Cowlitz River

The Columbia and its tributaries have been central to the region's culture and economy for thousands of years. They have been used for transportation since ancient times, linking the region's many cultural groups. The river system hosts many species of anadromous fish, which migrate between freshwater habitats and the saline waters of the Pacific Ocean. These fish—especially the salmon species—provided the core subsistence for native peoples.

The first documented European discovery of the Columbia River occurred when Bruno de Heceta sighted the river's mouth in 1775. On May 11, 1792, a private American ship, Columbia Rediviva, under Captain Robert Gray from Boston became the first non-indigenous vessel to enter the river. Later in 1792, William Robert Broughton of the British Royal Navy commanding HMS Chatham as part of the Vancouver Expedition, navigated past the Oregon Coast Range and 100 miles (160 km) upriver to what is now Vancouver, Washington. In the following decades, fur-trading companies used the Columbia as a key transportation route. Overland explorers entered the Willamette Valley through the scenic, but treacherous Columbia River Gorge, and pioneers began to settle the valley in increasing numbers. Steamships along the river linked communities and facilitated trade; the arrival of railroads in the late 19th century, many running along the river, supplemented these links.

Since the late 19th century, public and private sectors have extensively developed the river. To aid ship and barge navigation, locks have been built along the lower Columbia and its tributaries, and dredging has opened, maintained, and enlarged shipping channels. Since the early 20th century, dams have been built across the river for power generation, navigation, irrigation, and flood control. The 14 hydroelectric dams on the Columbia's main stem and many more on its tributaries produce more than 44 percent of total U.S. hydroelectric generation. Production of nuclear power has taken place at two sites along the river. Plutonium for nuclear weapons was produced for decades at the Hanford Site, which is now the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States. These developments have greatly altered river environments in the watershed, mainly through industrial pollution and barriers to fish migration.

Course

The Columbia begins its 1,243 mi (2,000 km) journey in the southern Rocky Mountain Trench in British Columbia (BC). Columbia Lake –  2,690 ft (820 m) above sea level –  and the adjoining Columbia Wetlands form the river's headwaters. The trench is a broad, deep, and long glacial valley between the Canadian Rockies and the Columbia Mountains in BC. For its first 200 mi (320 km), the Columbia flows northwest along the trench through Windermere Lake and the town of Invermere, a region known in BC as the Columbia Valley, then northwest to Golden and into Kinbasket Lake. Rounding the northern end of the Selkirk Mountains, the river turns sharply south through a region known as the Big Bend Country, passing through Revelstoke Lake and the Arrow Lakes. Revelstoke, the Big Bend, and the Columbia Valley combined are referred to in BC parlance as the Columbia Country. Below the Arrow Lakes, the Columbia passes the cities of Castlegar, located at the Columbia's confluence with the Kootenay River, and Trail, two major population centers of the West Kootenay region. The Pend Oreille River joins the Columbia about 2 miles (3 km) north of the United States–Canada border.^[15]

Course of the Columbia River

The Columbia enters eastern Washington flowing south and turning to the west at the Spokane River confluence. It marks the southern and eastern borders of the Colville Indian Reservation and the western border of the Spokane Indian Reservation.^[16] The river turns south after the Okanogan River confluence, then southeasterly near the confluence with the Wenatchee River in central Washington. This C-shaped segment of the river is also known as the "Big Bend". During the Missoula Floods 10–15,000 years ago, much of the floodwater took a more direct route south, forming the ancient river bed known as the Grand Coulee. After the floods, the river found its present course, and the Grand Coulee was left dry. The construction of the Grand Coulee Dam in the mid-20th century impounded the river, forming Lake Roosevelt, from which water was pumped into the dry coulee, forming the reservoir of Banks Lake.^[17]

The river flows past The Gorge Amphitheatre, a prominent concert venue in the Northwest, then through Priest Rapids Dam, and then through the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Entirely within the reservation is Hanford Reach, the only U.S. stretch of the river that is completely free-flowing, unimpeded by dams, and not a tidal estuary. The Snake River and Yakima River join the Columbia in the Tri-Cities population center. The Columbia makes a sharp bend to the west at the Washington–Oregon border. The river defines that border for the final 309 mi (497 km) of its journey.^[18]

The Columbia River Gorge facing east toward Beacon Rock

The Deschutes River joins the Columbia near The Dalles. Between The Dalles and Portland, the river cuts through the Cascade Range, forming the dramatic Columbia River Gorge. Via the gorge, the Columbia crosses the Cascades at a lower elevation than any other river. The gorge is known for its strong and steady winds, scenic beauty, and its role as an important transportation link.^[19] The river continues west, bending sharply to the north-northwest near Portland and Vancouver, Washington, at the Willamette River confluence. Here the river slows considerably, dropping sediment that might otherwise form a river delta at the Columbia's mouth. Near Longview, Washington and the Cowlitz River confluence, the river turns west again. The Columbia empties into the Pacific Ocean just west of Astoria, Oregon, over the Columbia Bar, a shifting sandbar that makes the river's mouth one of the most hazardous stretches of water to navigate in the world.^[20] Because of the danger and the many shipwrecks near the mouth, it acquired a reputation as the "Graveyard of Ships".^[21]

The Columbia drains an area of about 258,000 sq mi (670,000 km²).^[7] Its drainage basin covers nearly all of Idaho, large portions of British Columbia, Oregon, and Washington, and ultimately all of Montana west of the Continental Divide, and small portions of Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada; the total area is similar to the size of France. Roughly 745 mi (1,199 km) of the river's length and 85 percent of its drainage basin are in the US.^[22] The Columbia is the twelfth-longest river and has the sixth-largest drainage basin in the United States.^[7] In Canada, where the Columbia flows for 498 mi (801 km) and drains 39,700 sq mi (103,000 km²), the river ranks 23rd in length,^[23] and the Canadian part of its basin ranks 13th in size among Canadian basins.^[24] The Columbia shares its name with nearby places, such as British Columbia, as well as with landforms and bodies of water.

Discharge

Bathymetric map of the mouth of the Columbia River

With an average flow at the mouth of about 265,000 cu ft/s (7,500 m³/s),^[7] the Columbia is the largest river by discharge flowing into the Pacific from the Americas^[25] and is the fourth-largest by volume in the U.S.^[7] The average flow where the river crosses the international border between Canada and the United States is 2,790 m³/s (99,000 cu ft/s) from a drainage basin of 102,800 km² (39,700 sq mi).^[4] This amounts to about 15 percent of the entire Columbia watershed. The Columbia's highest recorded flow, measured at The Dalles, was 1,240,000 cu ft/s (35,000 m³/s) in June 1894, before the river was dammed.^[26] The lowest flow recorded at The Dalles was 12,100 cu ft/s (340 m³/s) on April 16, 1968, and was caused by the initial closure of the John Day Dam, 28 mi (45 km) upstream.^[26] The Dalles is about 190 mi (310 km) from the mouth; the river at this point drains about 237,000 sq mi (610,000 km²) or about 91 percent of the total watershed.^[26] Flow rates on the Columbia are affected by many large upstream reservoirs, many diversions for irrigation, and, on the lower stretches, reverse flow from the tides of the Pacific Ocean. The National Ocean Service observes water levels at six tide gauges and issues tide forecasts for twenty-two additional locations along the river between the entrance at the North Jetty and the base of Bonneville Dam, its head of tide.^[27]

Geology

See also: Geology of the Pacific Northwest and Missoula Floods

Drumheller Channels, part of the Channeled Scablands formed by the Missoula Floods

When the rifting of Pangaea, due to the process of plate tectonics, pushed North America away from Europe and Africa and into the Panthalassic Ocean (ancestor to the modern Pacific Ocean), the Pacific Northwest was not part of the continent. As the North American continent moved westward, the Farallon Plate subducted under its western margin. As the plate subducted, it carried along island arcs which were accreted to the North American continent, resulting in the creation of the Pacific Northwest between 150 and 90 million years ago.^[28] The general outline of the Columbia Basin was not complete until between 60 and 40 million years ago, but it lay under a large inland sea later subject to uplift.^[29] Between 50 and 20 million years ago, from the Eocene through the Miocene eras, tremendous volcanic eruptions frequently modified much of the landscape traversed by the Columbia.^[30] The lower reaches of the ancestral river passed through a valley near where Mount Hood later arose. Carrying sediments from erosion and erupting volcanoes, it built a 2-mile (3.2 km) thick delta that underlies the foothills on the east side of the Coast Range near Vernonia in northwestern Oregon.^[31] Between 17 million and 6 million years ago, huge outpourings of flood basalt lava covered the Columbia River Plateau and forced the lower Columbia into its present course.^[32] The modern Cascade Range began to uplift 5 to 4 million years ago.^[33] Cutting through the uplifting mountains, the Columbia River significantly deepened the Columbia River Gorge.^[34]

The river and its drainage basin experienced some of the world's greatest known catastrophic floods toward the end of the last ice age. The periodic rupturing of ice dams at Glacial Lake Missoula resulted in the Missoula Floods, with discharges exceeding the combined flow of all the other rivers in the world, dozens of times over thousands of years.^[33] The exact number of floods is unknown, but geologists have documented at least 40; evidence suggests that they occurred between about 19,000 and 13,000 years ago.^[35]

Panoramic view of Columbia River Gorge from Dog Mountain in Washington

The floodwaters rushed across eastern Washington, creating the channeled scablands, which are a complex network of dry canyon-like channels, or coulees that are often braided and sharply gouged into the basalt rock underlying the region's deep topsoil. Numerous flat-topped buttes with rich soil stand high above the chaotic scablands.^[36] Constrictions at several places caused the floodwaters to pool into large temporary lakes, such as Lake Lewis, in which sediments were deposited. Water depths have been estimated at 1,000 feet (300 m) at Wallula Gap^[37] and 400 feet (120 m) over modern Portland, Oregon.^[38] Sediments were also deposited when the floodwaters slowed in the broad flats of the Quincy, Othello, and Pasco Basins.^[36] The floods' periodic inundation of the lower Columbia River Plateau deposited rich sediments; 21st-century farmers in the Willamette Valley "plow fields of fertile Montana soil and clays from Washington's Palouse".^[37]

Over the last several thousand years a series of large landslides have occurred on the north side of the Columbia River Gorge, sending massive amounts of debris south from Table Mountain and Greenleaf Peak into the gorge near the present site of Bonneville Dam. The most recent and significant is known as the Bonneville Slide, which formed a massive earthen dam, filling 3.5 miles (5.6 km) of the river's length.^[39][40] Various studies have placed the date of the Bonneville Slide anywhere between 1060 and 1760 AD; the idea that the landslide debris present today was formed by more than one slide is relatively recent and may explain the large range of estimates.^[40] It has been suggested that if the later dates are accurate there may be a link with the 1700 Cascadia earthquake.^[40][41] The pile of debris resulting from the Bonneville Slide blocked the river until rising water finally washed away the sediment. It is not known how long it took the river to break through the barrier; estimates range from several months to several years.^[42] Much of the landslide's debris remained, forcing the river about 1.5 miles (2.4 km) south of its previous channel and forming the Cascade Rapids.^[43] In 1938, the construction of Bonneville Dam inundated the rapids as well as the remaining trees that could be used to refine the estimated date of the landslide.^[43][44]

In 1980, the eruption of Mount St. Helens deposited large amounts of sediment in the lower Columbia, temporarily reducing the depth of the shipping channel by 26 feet (7.9 m).^[45]

Indigenous peoples

Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce people

Humans have inhabited the Columbia's watershed for more than 15,000 years, with a transition to a sedentary lifestyle based mainly on salmon starting about 3,500 years ago.^[46] In 1962, archaeologists found evidence of human activity dating back 11,230 years at the Marmes Rockshelter, near the confluence of the Palouse and Snake rivers in eastern Washington. In 1996 the skeletal remains of a 9,000-year-old prehistoric man (dubbed Kennewick Man) were found near Kennewick, Washington. The discovery rekindled debate in the scientific community over the origins of human habitation in North America and sparked a protracted controversy over whether the scientific or Native American community was entitled to possess and/or study the remains.^[47]

Many different Native Americans and First Nations peoples have a historical and continuing presence on the Columbia. South of the Canada–US border, the Colville, Spokane, Coeur d'Alene, Yakama, Nez Perce, Cayuse, Palus, Umatilla, Cowlitz, and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs live along the US stretch. Along the upper Snake River and Salmon River, the Shoshone Bannock tribes are present. The Sinixt or Lakes people lived on the lower stretch of the Canadian portion,^[48] while above that the Shuswap people (Secwepemc in their own language) reckon the whole of the upper Columbia east to the Rockies as part of their territory.^[49] The Canadian portion of the Columbia Basin outlines the traditional homelands of the Canadian Kootenay–Ktunaxa.

The Chinook tribe, which is not federally recognized, who live near the lower Columbia River, call it Wimahl or Wimal in the Upper Chinook (Kiksht) language,^[50] and it is Nch’i-Wàna or Nchi wana to the Sahaptin (Ichishkíin Sɨ́nwit)-speaking peoples of its middle course in present-day Washington.^[51] The river is known as swah'netk'qhu by the Sinixt people, who live in the area of the Arrow Lakes in the river's upper reaches in Canada.^[52] All three terms essentially mean "the big river".

Oral histories describe the formation and destruction of the Bridge of the Gods, a land bridge that connected the Oregon and Washington sides of the river in the Columbia River Gorge. The bridge, which aligns with geological records of the Bonneville Slide, was described in some stories as the result of a battle between gods, represented by Mount Adams and Mount Hood, in their competition for the affection of a goddess, represented by Mount St. Helens.^[53] Native American stories about the bridge differ in their details but agree in general that the bridge permitted increased interaction between tribes on the north and south sides of the river.^[54][55]

Horses, originally acquired from Spanish New Mexico, spread widely via native trade networks, reaching the Shoshone of the Snake River Plain by 1700. The Nez Perce, Cayuse, and Flathead people acquired their first horses around 1730.^[56][57] Along with horses came aspects of the emerging plains culture, such as equestrian and horse training skills, greatly increased mobility, hunting efficiency, trade over long distances, intensified warfare, the linking of wealth and prestige to horses and war, and the rise of large and powerful tribal confederacies. The Nez Perce and Cayuse kept large herds and made annual long-distance trips to the Great Plains for bison hunting, adopted the plains culture to a significant degree, and became the main conduit through which horses and the plains culture diffused into the Columbia River region. Other peoples acquired horses and aspects of the plains culture unevenly. The Yakama, Umatilla, Palus, Spokane, and Coeur d'Alene maintained sizable herds of horses and adopted some of the plains cultural characteristics, but fishing and fish-related economies remained important. Less affected groups included the Molala, Klickitat, Wenatchi, Okanagan, and Sinkiuse-Columbia peoples, who owned small numbers of horses and adopted few plains culture features. Some groups remained essentially unaffected, such as the Sanpoil and Nespelem people, whose culture remained centered on fishing.^[56]

Natives of the region encountered foreigners at several times and places during the 18th and 19th centuries. European and American vessels explored the coastal area around the mouth of the river in the late 18th century, trading with local natives. The contact would prove devastating to the indigenous Chinookan speaking peoples; a large portion of their population was wiped out by a smallpox epidemic. Canadian explorer Alexander Mackenzie crossed what is now interior British Columbia in 1793.^[57] From 1805 to 1806, the Lewis and Clark Expedition entered the Oregon Country along the Clearwater and Snake rivers, and encountered numerous small settlements of natives. Their records recount tales of hospitable traders who were not above stealing small items from the visitors. They also noted brass teakettles, a British musket, and other artifacts that had been obtained in trade with coastal tribes.^[58] From the earliest contact with westerners, the natives of the mid- and lower Columbia were not tribal, but instead congregated in social units no larger than a village, and more often at a family level; these units would shift with the season as people moved about, following the salmon catch up and down the river's tributaries.^[59]

Sparked by the 1847 Whitman Massacre, a number of violent battles were fought between American settlers and the region's natives.^[60] The subsequent wars over Northwest territory, especially the Yakima War, decimated the native population and removed much land from native control.^[61] As years progressed, the right of natives to fish along the Columbia became the central issue of contention with the states, commercial fishers, and private property owners. The US Supreme Court upheld fishing rights in landmark cases in 1905 and 1918,^[62] as well as the 1974 case United States v. Washington, commonly called the Boldt Decision.

Dipnet fishing at Celilo Falls, 1941

Fish were central to the culture of the region's natives, both as sustenance and as part of their religious beliefs.^[63] Natives drew fish from the Columbia at several major sites, which also served as trading posts. Celilo Falls, located east of the modern city of The Dalles, was a vital hub for trade and the interaction of different cultural groups,^[59] being used for fishing and trading for 11,000 years. Prior to contact with westerners, villages along this 9-mile (14 km) stretch may have at times had a population as great as 10,000.^[64] The site drew traders from as far away as the Great Plains.^[65][66]

The Cascades Rapids of the Columbia River Gorge, and Kettle Falls and Priest Rapids in eastern Washington, were also major fishing and trading sites.^[67][68]

In prehistoric times the Columbia's salmon and steelhead runs numbered an estimated annual average of 10 to 16 million fish. In comparison, the largest run since 1938 was in 1986, with 3.2 million fish entering the Columbia.^[69] The annual catch by natives has been estimated at 42 million pounds (19,000 metric tons).^[70] The most important and productive native fishing site was located at Celilo Falls, which was perhaps the most productive inland fishing site in North America.^[71] The falls were located at the border between Chinookan- and Sahaptian-speaking peoples and served as the center of an extensive trading network across the Pacific Plateau.^[72] Celilo was the oldest continuously inhabited community on the North American continent.^[73]

Salmon canneries established by white settlers beginning in 1866 had a strong negative impact on the salmon population, and in 1908 US president Theodore Roosevelt observed that the salmon runs were but a fraction of what they had been 25 years prior.^[74]

As river development continued in the 20th century, each of these major fishing sites was flooded by a dam, beginning with Cascades Rapids in 1938. The development was accompanied by extensive negotiations between natives and US government agencies. The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, a coalition of various tribes, adopted a constitution and incorporated after the 1938 completion of the Bonneville Dam flooded Cascades Rapids;^[75] Still, in the 1930s, there were natives who lived along the river and fished year round, moving along with the fish's migration patterns throughout the seasons.^[76] The Yakama were slower to do so, organizing a formal government in 1944.^[77] In the 21st century, the Yakama, Nez Perce, Umatilla, and Warm Springs tribes all have treaty fishing rights along the Columbia and its tributaries.^[70]

In 1957 Celilo Falls was submerged by the construction of The Dalles Dam, and the native fishing community was displaced.^[73] The affected tribes received a $26.8 million settlement for the loss of Celilo and other fishing sites submerged by The Dalles Dam.^[78] The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs used part of its $4 million settlement to establish the Kah-Nee-Ta resort south of Mount Hood.^[75]

In 1977, 75 indigenous fishermen of the Yakama Tribe were arrested in a federal sting operation which claimed that fishermen were poaching up to 40,000 fish in the Columbia River. Fishermen placed on trial received sentences ranging from six months to five years. The federal government pinned Yakama Tribe member David Sohappy ringleader of the operation. After the trial ended, it was determined that the fish were not poached, but driven away because of harmful chemicals present in the power plant. These harmful chemicals mainly consisted of aluminum. This event is commonly known today as the Salmon Scam.^[79]

Shortly after the Salmon Scam, many Columbia River-based indigenous tribes received federally recognized status. The Siletz Tribe was the first to restore its federal recognition in 1977, followed by the Cow Creek Band of the Umpqua Tribe in 1982, the Grand Ronde Tribe in 1983, the Lower Umpqua Tribe, Siuslaw Tribe, and Coos Tribe in 1984, the Klamath Tribe in 1986, and the Coquille Tribe in 1989.^[80] While all the aforementioned tribes received federally recognized status, the Chinook Indian Nation had their federal recognition revoked in 2002 by the Bush Administration, and are fighting to have it restored.^[81]

In 2023, members of the Yakama Nation expressed their dismay for the construction of a Goldendale-based pumped hydroelectric energy storage project. Jeremy Takala of the Yakama Nation embodies Yakama belief on the importance of Columbia River crops to food and medicine, stating “the [Goldendale] project being proposed here, it will definitely impact our life”.  The Goldendale-pumped hydro storage unit could allow for reused water use in reservoirs, which would be placed on mountainous terrain overlooking the Columbia River. The mountainous terrain where the unit would be placed in is Juniper Point, referred to by the Yakama as Pushpum. Pushpum has rock formations, as well as food and medicine capabilities that are essential to the Yakama. Members of the Yakama tribe wish for consent on the Goldendale project, as opposed to consultation.^[82]

New waves of explorers

See also: History of Oregon, History of British Columbia, History of Washington (state), Oregon Country, and History of the west coast of North America

Multnomah Falls, painted by James W. Alden, 1857

Some historians ^[who?] believe that Japanese or Chinese vessels blown off course reached the Northwest Coast long before Europeans—possibly as early as 219 BCE. Historian Derek Hayes claims that "It is a near certainty that Japanese or Chinese people arrived on the northwest coast long before any European."^{[83][citation needed]} It is unknown whether they landed near the Columbia. Evidence exists that Spanish castaways reached the shore in 1679 and traded with the Clatsop; if these were the first Europeans to see the Columbia, they failed to send word home to Spain.^{[84][citation needed]}

In the 18th century, there was strong interest in discovering a Northwest Passage that would permit navigation between the Atlantic (or inland North America) and the Pacific Ocean. Many ships in the area, especially those under Spanish and British command, searched the northwest coast for a large river that might connect to Hudson Bay or the Missouri River. The first documented European discovery of the Columbia River was that of Bruno de Heceta, who in 1775 sighted the river's mouth. On the advice of his officers, he did not explore it, as he was short-staffed and the current was strong. He considered it a bay, and called it Ensenada de Asunción (Assumption Cove). Later Spanish maps, based on his sighting, showed a river, labeled Río de San Roque (The Saint Roch River),^[50] or an entrance, called Entrada de Hezeta, named for Bruno de Hezeta, who sailed the region.^[84] Following Hezeta's reports, British maritime fur trader Captain John Meares searched for the river in 1788 but concluded that it did not exist.^[85] He named Cape Disappointment for the non-existent river, not realizing the cape marks the northern edge of the river's mouth.^[86]

What happened next would form the basis for decades of both cooperation and dispute between British and American exploration of, and ownership claim to, the region. Royal Navy commander George Vancouver sailed past the mouth in April 1792 and observed a change in the water's color, but he accepted Meares' report and continued on his journey northward.^[50] Later that month, Vancouver encountered the American captain Robert Gray at the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Gray reported that he had seen the entrance to the Columbia and had spent nine days trying but failing to enter.^[87]

Carver's map from 1778, showing the River of the West, New Albion, Lake Winnipeg, and the Mountains of Bright Stone

On May 12, 1792, Gray returned south and crossed the Columbia Bar, becoming the first known explorer of European descent to enter the river. Gray's fur trading mission had been financed by Boston merchants, who outfitted him with a private vessel named Columbia Rediviva; he named the river after the ship on May 18.^[84][88] Gray spent nine days trading near the mouth of the Columbia, then left without having gone beyond 13 miles (21 km) upstream. The farthest point reached was Grays Bay at the mouth of Grays River.^[89] Gray's discovery of the Columbia River was later used by the United States to support its claim to the Oregon Country, which was also claimed by Russia, Great Britain, Spain and other nations.^[90]

In October 1792, Vancouver sent Lieutenant William Robert Broughton, his second-in-command, up the river. Broughton got as far as the Sandy River at the western end of the Columbia River Gorge, about 100 miles (160 km) upstream, sighting and naming Mount Hood. Broughton formally claimed the river, its drainage basin, and the nearby coast for Britain. In contrast, Gray had not made any formal claims on behalf of the United States.^[91][92]

Columbia River, Cascade Mountains, Oregon, (1876) by Vincent Colyer (oil on canvas). Beacon Rock is visible on the left.

Detail from the Lewis and Clark Expedition map. The Willamette River is shown as the "Multnomah", while the Snake River is "Lewis's River". (See complete map.)

Because the Columbia was at the same latitude as the headwaters of the Missouri River, there was some speculation that Gray and Vancouver had discovered the long-sought Northwest Passage. A 1798 British map showed a dotted line connecting the Columbia with the Missouri.^[84] When the American explorers Meriwether Lewis and William Clark charted the vast, unmapped lands of the American West in their overland expedition (1803–1805), they found no passage between the rivers. After crossing the Rocky Mountains, Lewis and Clark built dugout canoes and paddled down the Snake River, reaching the Columbia near the present-day Tri-Cities, Washington. They explored a few miles upriver, as far as Bateman Island, before heading down the Columbia, concluding their journey at the river's mouth and establishing Fort Clatsop, a short-lived establishment that was occupied for less than three months.^[84]

Canadian explorer David Thompson, of the North West Company, spent the winter of 1807–08 at Kootanae House near the source of the Columbia at present-day Invermere, BC. Over the next few years he explored much of the river and its northern tributaries. In 1811 he traveled down the Columbia to the Pacific Ocean, arriving at the mouth just after John Jacob Astor's Pacific Fur Company had founded Astoria. On his return to the north, Thompson explored the one remaining part of the river he had not yet seen, becoming the first Euro-descended person to travel the entire length of the river.^[84]

In 1825, the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) established Fort Vancouver on the bank of the Columbia, in what is now Vancouver, Washington, as the headquarters of the company's Columbia District, which encompassed everything west of the Rocky Mountains, north of California, and south of Russian-claimed Alaska. Chief Factor John McLoughlin, a physician who had been in the fur trade since 1804, was appointed superintendent of the Columbia District. The HBC reoriented its Columbia District operations toward the Pacific Ocean via the Columbia, which became the region's main trunk route.^[93] In the early 1840s Americans began to colonize the Oregon country in large numbers via the Oregon Trail, despite the HBC's efforts to discourage American settlement in the region. For many the final leg of the journey involved travel down the lower Columbia River to Fort Vancouver.^[94] This part of the Oregon Trail, the treacherous stretch from The Dalles to below the Cascades, could not be traversed by horses or wagons (only watercraft, at great risk). This prompted the 1846 construction of the Barlow Road.^[95]

In the Treaty of 1818 the United States and Britain agreed that both nations were to enjoy equal rights in Oregon Country for 10 years. By 1828, when the so-called "joint occupation" was renewed indefinitely, it seemed probable that the lower Columbia River would in time become the border between the two nations. For years the Hudson's Bay Company successfully maintained control of the Columbia River and American attempts to gain a foothold were fended off. In the 1830s, American religious missions were established at several locations in the lower Columbia River region. In the 1840s a mass migration of American settlers undermined British control. The Hudson's Bay Company tried to maintain dominance by shifting from the fur trade, which was in decline, to exporting other goods such as salmon and lumber. Colonization schemes were attempted, but failed to match the scale of American settlement. Americans generally settled south of the Columbia, mainly in the Willamette Valley. The Hudson's Bay Company tried to establish settlements north of the river, but nearly all the British colonists moved south to the Willamette Valley. The hope that the British colonists might dilute the American presence in the valley failed in the face of the overwhelming number of American settlers. These developments rekindled the issue of "joint occupation" and the boundary dispute. While some British interests, especially the Hudson's Bay Company, fought for a boundary along the Columbia River, the Oregon Treaty of 1846 set the boundary at the 49th parallel. As part of the treaty, the British retained all areas north of the line while the United States acquired the south. The Columbia River became much of the border between the U.S. territories of Oregon and Washington.^[96] Oregon became a U.S. state in 1859, while Washington later entered into the Union in 1889.

By the turn of the 20th century, the difficulty of navigating the Columbia was seen as an impediment to the economic development of the Inland Empire region east of the Cascades.^[97] The dredging and dam building that followed would permanently alter the river, disrupting its natural flow but also providing electricity, irrigation, navigability and other benefits to the region.

Navigation

See also: Steamboats of the Columbia River; Steamboats of the Columbia River, Wenatchee Reach; and Shipwrecks of the inland Columbia River

The mouth of the Columbia is just past Astoria, Oregon; ships must navigate the treacherous Columbia Bar (near horizon, not visible in this picture) to enter or exit the river.

The sternwheeler Hassalo runs the Cascades Rapids, May 26, 1888. The rapids are now submerged under the pool of the Bonneville Dam.

A massive Benson log raft, containing an entire year's worth of logs from one timber camp, heads downriver in 1906

American captain Robert Gray and British captain George Vancouver, who explored the river in 1792, proved that it was possible to cross the Columbia Bar. Many of the challenges associated with that feat remain today; even with modern engineering alterations to the mouth of the river, the strong currents and shifting sandbar make it dangerous to pass between the river and the Pacific Ocean.^[98]

The use of steamboats along the river, beginning with the British Beaver in 1836^[99] and followed by American vessels in 1850,^[100] contributed to the rapid settlement and economic development of the region.^[101][102] Steamboats operated in several distinct stretches of the river: on its lower reaches, from the Pacific Ocean to Cascades Rapids; from the Cascades to the Dalles-Celilo Falls; from Celilo to Priests Rapids; on the Wenatchee Reach of eastern Washington; on British Columbia's Arrow Lakes; and on tributaries like the Willamette, the Snake and Kootenay Lake. The boats, initially powered by burning wood, carried passengers and freight throughout the region for many years. Early railroads served to connect steamboat lines interrupted by waterfalls on the river's lower reaches.^[103] In the 1880s, railroads maintained by companies such as the Oregon Railroad and Navigation Company began to supplement steamboat operations as the major transportation links along the river.^[104]

Opening the passage to Lewiston

As early as 1881, industrialists proposed altering the natural channel of the Columbia to improve navigation.^[100] Changes to the river over the years have included the construction of jetties at the river's mouth, dredging, and the construction of canals and navigation locks. Today, ocean freighters can travel upriver as far as Portland and Vancouver, and barges can reach as far inland as Lewiston, Idaho.^[22]

The shifting Columbia Bar makes passage between the river and the Pacific Ocean difficult and dangerous, and numerous rapids along the river hinder navigation. Pacific Graveyard, a 1964 book by James A. Gibbs, describes the many shipwrecks near the mouth of the Columbia.^[105] Jetties, first constructed in 1886,^[100] extend the river's channel into the ocean. Strong currents and the shifting sandbar remain a threat to ships entering the river and necessitate continuous maintenance of the jetties.

In 1891, the Columbia was dredged to enhance shipping. The channel between the ocean and Portland and Vancouver was deepened from 17 feet (5.2 m) to 25 feet (7.6 m). The Columbian called for the channel to be deepened to 40 feet (12 m) as early as 1905, but that depth was not attained until 1976.^[106]

Cascade Locks and Canal were first constructed in 1896 around the Cascades Rapids,^[107] enabling boats to travel safely through the Columbia River Gorge.^[108] The Celilo Canal, bypassing Celilo Falls, opened to river traffic in 1915.^[109] In the mid-20th century, the construction of dams along the length of the river submerged the rapids beneath a series of reservoirs. An extensive system of locks allowed ships and barges to pass easily between reservoirs. A navigation channel reaching Lewiston, Idaho, along the Columbia and Snake rivers, was completed in 1975.^[100] Among the main commodities are wheat and other grains, mainly for export. As of 2016, the Columbia ranked third, behind the Mississippi and Paraná rivers, among the world's largest export corridors for grain.^[110]

The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens caused mudslides in the area, which reduced the Columbia's depth by 25 feet (7.6 m) for a 4-mile (6.4 km) stretch, disrupting Portland's economy.^[111]

Deeper shipping channel

The Essayons, one of three Army Corps of Engineers dredgers tasked with ongoing maintenance of the Columbia's shipping channel, began service in 1983.^{[citation needed]}

Efforts to maintain and improve the navigation channel have continued to the present day. In 1990 a new round of studies examined the possibility of further dredging on the lower Columbia. The plans were controversial from the start because of economic and environmental concerns.^[112]

In 1999, Congress authorized deepening the channel between Portland and Astoria from 40 to 43 feet (12–13 m), which will make it possible for large container and grain ships to reach Portland and Vancouver.^[113] The project has met opposition because of concerns about stirring up toxic sediment on the riverbed. Portland-based Northwest Environmental Advocates brought a lawsuit against the Army Corps of Engineers, but it was rejected by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in August 2006.^[114] The project includes measures to mitigate environmental damage; for instance, the US Army Corps of Engineers must restore 12 times the area of wetland damaged by the project.^[113] In early 2006, the Corps spilled 50 US gallons (190 L) of hydraulic oil into the Columbia, drawing further criticism from environmental organizations.^[115]

Work on the project began in 2005 and concluded in 2010.^[116] The project's cost is estimated at $150 million. The federal government is paying 65 percent, Oregon and Washington are paying $27 million each, and six local ports are also contributing to the cost.^[113][117]

Dams

See also: Hydroelectric dams on the Columbia River and Columbia River Treaty

Fish ladder at John Day Dam; its reservoir forms the deadliest stretch of the river for young salmon.^[118]

Dams on the Columbia have transformed the river into a series of slackwater pools, such as this one between Bonneville and The Dalles, as seen from Rowena Crest

Kinbasket Lake, a reservoir on the Columbia River

In 1902, the United States Bureau of Reclamation was established to aid in the economic development of arid western states.^[119] One of its major undertakings was building Grand Coulee Dam to provide irrigation for the 600 thousand acres (2,400 km²) of the Columbia Basin Project in central Washington.^[120] With the onset of World War II, the focus of dam construction shifted to production of hydroelectricity. Irrigation efforts resumed after the war.

River development occurred within the structure of the 1909 International Boundary Waters Treaty between the United States and Canada. The United States Congress passed the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1925, which directed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Power Commission to explore the development of the nation's rivers. This prompted agencies to conduct the first formal financial analysis of hydroelectric development; the reports produced by various agencies were presented in House Document 308. Those reports, and subsequent related reports, are referred to as 308 Reports.^[121]

The 308 Reports generated 176 publications across the United States.^[122] Of those 176 documents, thirteen of them were generated in the Pacific Northwest. In 1932, one of the thirteen reports was released on the Columbia River, titled The Columbia River and Minor Tributaries. The report was backed by many engineers and state politicians who believed that the creation of Dams along the Columbia River would be a strong candidate for generation of hydroelectric power. The report led to Congressional action, where dams at Bonneville and Grand Coulee were authorized in 1933.

The report itself emphasized the economic values of dam creation. Additionally, the reports emphasized the importance of dams for river navigation. Furthermore, the reports emphasized the importance of hydropower, storage of water for irrigation techniques, and flood control. To ensure that the dams did not affect biodiversity, many engineers and state politicians regarded the importance of salmon within the region. Thus, dams were to be built at a low height that would permit salmon to pass over.^[123]

In the late 1920s, political forces in the Northwestern United States generally favored the private development of hydroelectric dams along the Columbia. But the overwhelming victories of gubernatorial candidate George W. Joseph in the 1930 Republican primary, and later his law partner Julius Meier, were understood to demonstrate strong public support for public ownership of dams.^[124] In 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a bill that enabled the construction of the Bonneville and Grand Coulee dams as public works projects. The legislation was attributed to the efforts of Oregon Senator Charles McNary, Washington Senator Clarence Dill, and Oregon Congressman Charles Martin, among others.^[125]

In 1948, floods swept through the Columbia watershed, destroying Vanport, then the second largest city in Oregon, and impacting cities as far north as Trail, BC.^[126] The flooding prompted the U.S. Congress to pass the Flood Control Act of 1950, authorizing the federal development of additional dams and other flood control mechanisms. By that time local communities had become wary of federal hydroelectric projects, and sought local control of new developments; a public utility district in Grant County, Washington, ultimately began construction of the dam at Priest Rapids.^[127]

In the 1960s, the United States and Canada signed the Columbia River Treaty, which focused on flood control and the maximization of downstream power generation.^[121] Canada agreed to build dams and provide reservoir storage, and the United States agreed to deliver to Canada one-half of the increase in United States downstream power benefits as estimated five years in advance.^[128] Canada's obligation was met by building three dams (two on the Columbia, and one on the Duncan River), the last of which was completed in 1973.^[129]

Today the main stem of the Columbia River has fourteen dams, of which three are in Canada and eleven in the United States. Four mainstem dams and four lower Snake River dams contain navigation locks to allow ship and barge passage from the ocean as far as Lewiston, Idaho. The river system as a whole has more than 400 dams for hydroelectricity and irrigation.^[22] The dams address a variety of demands, including flood control, navigation, stream flow regulation, storage, and delivery of stored waters, reclamation of public lands and Indian reservations and territories, and the generation of hydroelectric power.^[130]

This river may have been shaped by God, or glaciers, or the remnants of the inland sea, or gravity, or a combination of all, but the Army Corps of Engineers controls it now. The Columbia rises and falls, not by the dictates of tide or rainfall, but by a computer-activated, legally arbitrated, federally allocated schedule that changes only when significant litigation is concluded, or a United States Senator nears election time. In that sense, it is reliable.

Timothy Egan, in The Good Rain^[131]

The larger U.S. dams are owned and operated by the federal government (some by the Army Corps of Engineers and some by the Bureau of Reclamation), while the smaller dams are operated by public utility districts and private power companies. The federally operated system is known as the Federal Columbia River Power System, which includes 31 dams on the Columbia and its tributaries. The system has altered the seasonal flow of the river to meet higher electricity demands during the winter. At the beginning of the 20th century, roughly 75 percent of the Columbia's flow occurred in the summer, between April and September. By 1980, the summer proportion had been lowered to about 50 percent, essentially eliminating the seasonal pattern.^[132]

Upon its creation in 1942, the Grand Coulee Dam required land inundation for construction. This flooding included parts of the Colville Reservation and Spokane Reservation. Reservation flooding has resulted in the displacement of 2,250 indigenous peoples located on said reservations.^[133]

The installation of dams dramatically altered the landscape and ecosystem of the river. At one time, the Columbia was one of the top salmon-producing river systems in the world.^[134] Previously active fishing sites, such as Celilo Falls in the eastern Columbia River Gorge, have exhibited a sharp decline in fishing along the Columbia in the last century, and salmon populations have been dramatically reduced.^[135] Fish ladders have been installed at some dam sites to help the fish journey to spawning waters. Fish ladders have been seen as highly effective when configurations to fishway exits are properly configured, as reconstructing the Bradford Island fish ladder allowed Sockeye salmon to stray away from spillway zones, reducing fallback (the rate at which fish are found moving away from a dam post-migration) and mortality birthrates. However, improper construction of fish ladders can result in salmon populations exerting significantly more energy when breeding, which results in higher levels of fallback.^[136] Chief Joseph Dam has no fish ladders and completely blocks fish migration to the upper half of the Columbia River system.^[137]

In 2019, both the Yakama and Lummi Northwest Nations proposed to remove the Bonneville, John Day, and The Dalles dams due to their belief removal would strengthen salmon population.^[138] The former Chairman of the Lummi Nation, Jay Julius, stated in 2019 that the fate of salmon without dam removal for the Lummi Nation is a “horrifying reality”.^[139] JoDe Goudy, a former Chairman of the Yakama Nation, coincides with beliefs of the Lummi Nation, stating “The Columbia River Dams were built on this false legal foundation, and decimated the Yakama Nation’s fisheries, traditional foods, and cultural sites.”.^[140] Both Nations have worked with nonprofit advocacy organizations to further removal agendas.

Throughout 2021, the nonprofit organization Earthjustice represented 10 conservation and fishing organizations in negotiations with President Joe Biden over removal of dam operations on the Snake River. These negotiations culminated in a lawsuit, with Earthjustice requesting to completely halt operations due to their belief of Snake River Dam effects on salmon and steelhead fish runs. On December 15, 2021, the two parties agreed to settle the dispute and focus on a plan to mitigate fish extinction.^[141]

Proposed in December 2023, President Joe Biden agreed to a $1 billion mandate, which will attempt to reintroduce Columbia River salmon blockaded by dams. The mandate asked for the Bonneville Power Administration to supply US$300 million over a ten-year span starting in 2024, which includes habitat restoration and upgrades in fish hatcheries. Furthermore, the Biden administration has publicly stated it will examine the possibility of doubling fish and wildlife spending to meet tribal needs. As a benchmark for financial utilization, US$1 billion in backlogged projects have been identified in the Columbia River Basin.^[142] The mandate did not call for the removal of four dams on the Snake River.^[143]

Irrigation

Prominent dams of the Columbia River Basin. Color indicates dam ownership:

  US Federal government

  Public utilities

  State, provincial, or local government

  Private

The Bureau of Reclamation's Columbia Basin Project focused on the generally dry region of central Washington known as the Columbia Basin, which features rich loess soil.^[17] Several groups developed competing proposals, and in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the Columbia Basin Project. The Grand Coulee Dam was the project's central component; upon completion, it pumped water up from the Columbia to fill the formerly dry Grand Coulee, forming Banks Lake. By 1935, the intended height of the dam was increased from a range between 200 and 300 feet (61 and 91 m) to 500 feet (150 m), a height that would extend the lake impounded by the dam to the Canada–United States border; the project had grown from a local New Deal relief measure to a major national project.^[130]

The project's initial purpose was irrigation, but the onset of World War II created a high electricity demand, mainly for aluminum production and for the development of nuclear weapons at the Hanford Site. Irrigation began in 1951.^[144] The project provides water to more than 670 thousand acres (2,700 square kilometers) of fertile but arid land in central Washington,^[17] transforming the region into a major agricultural center. Important crops include orchard fruit, potatoes, alfalfa, mint, beans, beets, and wine grapes.^[22]

Since 1750, the Columbia has experienced six multi-year droughts. The longest, lasting 12 years in the mid‑19th century, reduced the river's flow to 20 percent below average. Scientists have expressed concern that a similar drought would have grave consequences in a region so dependent on the Columbia.^[145] In 1992–1993, a lesser drought affected farmers, hydroelectric power producers, shippers, and wildlife managers.^[145]

Many farmers in central Washington build dams on their property for irrigation and to control frost on their crops. The Washington Department of Ecology, using new techniques involving aerial photographs, estimated there may be as many as a hundred such dams in the area, most of which are illegal. Six such dams have failed in recent years, causing hundreds of thousands of dollars of damage to crops and public roads. Fourteen farms in the area have gone through the permitting process to build such dams legally.^[146]

Hydroelectricity

The Columbia's heavy flow and large elevation drop over a short distance, 2.16 feet per mile (40.9 centimeters per kilometer), give it tremendous capacity for hydroelectricity generation. In comparison, the Mississippi drops less than 0.65 feet per mile (12.3 cm/km). The Columbia alone possesses one-third of the United States's hydroelectric potential.^[147] In 2012, the river and its tributaries accounted for 29 GW of hydroelectric generating capacity, contributing 44 percent of the total hydroelectric generation in the nation.^[148]

Roll on, Columbia, roll on, roll on, Columbia, roll on / Your power is turning our darkness to dawn / Roll on, Columbia, roll on. Lyrics from Woody Guthrie's 1941 song Roll on Columbia, written for the Bonneville Power Administration.

The largest of the 150 hydroelectric projects, the Grand Coulee Dam and Chief Joseph Dam are also the largest in the United States.^[149][150] As of 2017, Grand Coulee is the fifth largest hydroelectric plant in the world.^[151]

Inexpensive hydropower supported the location of a large aluminum industry in the region because its reduction from bauxite requires large amounts of electricity. Until 2000, the Northwestern United States produced up to 17 percent of the world's aluminum and 40 percent of the aluminum produced in the United States.^[152] The commoditization of power in the early 21st century, coupled with a drought that reduced the generation capacity of the river, damaged the industry and by 2001, Columbia River aluminum producers had idled 80 percent of its production capacity.^[152] By 2003, the entire United States produced only 15 percent of the world's aluminum and many smelters along the Columbia had gone dormant or out of business.^[153][154]

Power remains relatively inexpensive along the Columbia, and since the mid-2000 several global enterprises have moved server farm operations into the area to avail themselves of cheap power.^{[155][156][157]} Downriver of Grand Coulee, each dam's reservoir is closely regulated by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and various Washington public utility districts to ensure flow, flood control, and power generation objectives are met. Increasingly, hydro-power operations are required to meet standards under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and other agreements to manage operations to minimize impacts on salmon and other fish, and some conservation and fishing groups support removing four dams on the lower Snake River, the largest tributary of the Columbia.^[158]

In 1941, the BPA hired Oklahoma folksinger Woody Guthrie to write songs for a documentary film^[159] promoting the benefits of hydropower. In the month he spent traveling the region Guthrie wrote 26 songs, which have become an important part of the cultural history of the region.^[160][161]

Ecology and environment

Fish migration

See also: Environmental impact of reservoirs

Seining salmon on the Columbia River, 1914

In their natural life cycle, salmon die shortly after spawning. Eagle Creek in Oregon, November 2007.

The Columbia supports several species of anadromous fish that migrate between the Pacific Ocean and freshwater tributaries of the river. Sockeye salmon, Coho and Chinook ("king") salmon, and steelhead, all of the genus Oncorhynchus, are ocean fish that migrate up the rivers at the end of their life cycles to spawn.^[162] White sturgeon, which take 15 to 25 years to mature, typically migrate between the ocean and the upstream habitat several times during their lives.^[163]

Salmon populations declined dramatically after the establishment of canneries in 1867. In 1879 it was reported that 545,450 salmon, with an average weight of 22 pounds (10.0 kg) were caught (in a recent season) and mainly canned for export to England. A can weighing 1 pound (0.45 kg) could be sold for 8d or 9d.^[164] By 1908, there was widespread concern about the decline of salmon and sturgeon. In that year, the people of Oregon passed two laws under their newly instituted program of citizens' initiatives limiting fishing on the Columbia and other rivers.^[165] Then in 1948, another initiative banned the use of seine nets (devices already used by Native Americans, and refined by later settlers) altogether.^[166]

Dams interrupt the migration of anadromous fish. Salmon and steelhead return to the streams in which they were born to spawn; where dams prevent their return, entire populations of salmon die. Some of the Columbia and Snake River dams employ fish ladders, which are effective to varying degrees at allowing these fish to travel upstream. Another problem exists for the juvenile salmon headed downstream to the ocean. Previously, this journey would have taken two to three weeks. With river currents slowed by the dams, and the Columbia converted from a wild river to a series of slackwater pools, the journey can take several months, which increases the mortality rate.^[167] In some cases, the Army Corps of Engineers transports juvenile fish downstream by truck or river barge. The Chief Joseph Dam and several dams on the Columbia's tributaries entirely block migration, and there are no migrating fish on the river above these dams. Sturgeons have different migration habits and can survive without ever visiting the ocean. In many upstream areas cut off from the ocean by dams, sturgeon simply live upstream of the dam.^[168]

Not all fish have suffered from the modifications to the river; the northern pikeminnow (formerly known as the squawfish) thrives in the warmer, slower water created by the dams. Research in the mid-1980s found that juvenile salmon were suffering substantially from the predatory pikeminnow,^[169] and in 1990, in the interest of protecting salmon, a "bounty" program was established to reward anglers for catching pikeminnow.^[170]

In 1994, the salmon catch was smaller than usual in the rivers of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia, causing concern among commercial fishermen, government agencies, and tribal leaders.^[171][172] US government intervention, to which the states of Alaska, Idaho, and Oregon objected, included an 11-day closure of an Alaska fishery.^[173] In April 1994 the Pacific Fisheries Management Council unanimously approved the strictest regulations in 18 years, banning all commercial salmon fishing for that year from Cape Falcon north to the Canada–US border.^[75][174] In the winter of 1994, the return of coho salmon far exceeded expectations, which was attributed in part to the fishing ban.^[175]

Also in 1994, United States Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt proposed the removal of several Pacific Northwest dams because of their impact on salmon spawning.^[176] The Northwest Power Planning Council approved a plan that provided more water for fish and less for electricity, irrigation, and transportation.^[177] Environmental advocates have called for the removal of certain dams in the Columbia system in the years since. Of the 227 major dams in the Columbia River drainage basin, the four Washington dams on the lower Snake River are often identified for removal,^[178] for example in an ongoing lawsuit concerning a Bush administration plan for salmon recovery.^[158] These dams and reservoirs limit the recovery of upriver salmon runs to Idaho's Salmon and Clearwater rivers.^[179] Historically, the Snake produced over 1.5 million spring and summer Chinook salmon, a number that has dwindled to several thousand in recent years.^[180] Idaho Power Company's Hells Canyon dams have no fish ladders (and do not pass juvenile salmon downstream), and thus allow no steelhead or salmon to migrate above Hells Canyon. In 2007, the destruction of the Marmot Dam on the Sandy River was the first dam removal in the system.^[181] Other Columbia Basin dams that have been removed include Condit Dam on Washington's White Salmon River, and the Milltown Dam on the Clark Fork in Montana.^[182]

Pollution

In southeastern Washington, a 50-mile (80 km) stretch of the river passes through the Hanford Site, established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project. The site served as a plutonium production complex, with nine nuclear reactors and related facilities along the banks of the river. From 1944 to 1971, pump systems drew cooling water from the river and, after treating this water for use by the reactors, returned it to the river. Before being released back into the river, the used water was held in large tanks known as retention basins for up to six hours. Longer-lived isotopes were not affected by this retention, and several terabecquerels entered the river every day. By 1957, the eight plutonium production reactors at Hanford dumped a daily average of 50,000 curies of radioactive material into the Columbia.^[183] These releases were kept secret by the federal government until the release of declassified documents in the late 1980s.^[184] Radiation was measured downstream as far west as the Washington and Oregon coasts.^[185]

Nuclear reactors at the Hanford Site along the river

The nuclear reactors were decommissioned at the end of the Cold War, and the Hanford site is the focus of one of the world's largest environmental cleanup, managed by the Department of Energy under the oversight of the Washington Department of Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency.^[186] Nearby aquifers contain an estimated 270 billion US gallons (1 billion m³) of groundwater contaminated by high-level nuclear waste that has leaked out of Hanford's underground storage tanks.^[187] As of 2008^[update], 1 million US gallons (3,785 m³) of highly radioactive waste is traveling through groundwater toward the Columbia River. This waste is expected to reach the river in 12 to 50 years if cleanup does not proceed on schedule.^[188]

In addition to concerns about nuclear waste, numerous other pollutants are found in the river. These include chemical pesticides, bacteria, arsenic, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB).^[189]

Studies have also found significant levels of toxins in fish and the waters they inhabit within the basin. Accumulation of toxins in fish threatens the survival of fish species, and human consumption of these fish can lead to health problems. Water quality is also an important factor in the survival of other wildlife and plants that grow in the Columbia River drainage basin. The states, indigenous tribes, and federal government are all engaged in efforts to restore and improve the water, land, and air quality of the Columbia River drainage basin and have committed to work together to accomplish critical ecosystem restoration efforts. Several cleanup efforts are underway, including Superfund projects at Portland Harbor, Hanford, and Lake Roosevelt.^[190]

In early 2022, thousands of protestors demonstrated a demand for heightened cleanup efforts within the Hanford Nuclear Site. In June 2022, nearly 200 protestors attended the Hanford Journey Event, an educational tour which allowed those concerned about the Hanford Nuclear Site to learn about proposed cleanup efforts.The Hanford Journey Event was co-sponsored by the Yakama Nation. Davis Washines, a representative from the Yakama Nation Department of Natural Resources, alluded to “[the Hanford cleanup] has a lot of meaning to us, to our people. And not just for us, our personal safety, but to this ground, to the water, because they were here before we were”.^[191] Congress responded in 2022 by increasing the budget for the Hanford clean-up efforts, after thousands of comments were sent to federal authorities to prevent high-level waste storage at Hanford.^[192]

Starting between April to June 2025, the Hanford Nuclear Site is expected to melt radioactive wastes combined with glass flakes at a rate of 21 metric tons per day.  The melters being utilized have a lifespan of five years, which requires their replacement in 2030. As of 2023, the Hanford site cleanup project is sixteen years behind schedule. One of the harmful chemicals located in the Hanford site, strontium-90, reached over 2,000 times the standard concentration for drinking water in August 2022.^[193]

Timber industry activity further contaminates river water, for example in the increased sediment runoff that results from clearcuts. The Northwest Forest Plan, a piece of federal legislation from 1994, mandated that timber companies consider the environmental impacts of their practices on rivers like the Columbia.^[194]

On July 1, 2003, Christopher Swain became the first person to swim the Columbia River's entire length, to raise public awareness about the river's environmental health.^{[189][195][196]}

Throughout 2019, a series of wildfires were ongoing in Oregon on indigenous land belonging to the Umpqua Tribe. The Umpqua Tribe lost possession to their former territory in 1853, which is now known as Elliott State Forest. Elliott State Forest has been the subject of many deforestation initiatives over past years. In December 2018, the Umpqua tribe settled in Oregon after purchasing land from the Bureau of Land Management. Michael Rondeau, a descendent of the Umpqua tribe, expressed his contradictory emotions on the acquisition, stating that he felt "sadness that my grandparents and great aunts and uncles and beyond that did not have a day of recognition". On July 14, 2019, in the Milepost 97 wildfires, 25% of the Umpqua's forest territory burned down.^[197]

On March 7, 2022, Columbia Riverkeeper, a climate advocacy group, sued Weyerhaeuser, a timber and forest products company, for possible contamination of the Columbia River. Columbia Riverkeeper accused Weyerhaeuser of releasing harmful levels of runoff through their Longview Mill into the Columbia River. Furthermore, Columbia Riverkeeper stated that runoff could result in harmful bacteria growth. As of May 6, 2022, Weyerhaeuser reached a settlement with Columbia Riverkeeper. Weyerhaeuser was determined to contribute US$600,000 for river restoration and proposed potential fines of up to US$5,000 for each subsequent act of pollution between 2023 and 2025.^[198]

Nutrient cycle

Main article: Nutrient cycling in the Columbia River Basin

Both natural and anthropogenic processes are involved in the cycling of nutrients in the Columbia River basin. Natural processes in the system include estuarine mixing of fresh and ocean waters, and climate variability patterns such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the El Nino Southern Oscillation (both climatic cycles that affect the amount of regional snowpack and river discharge).^[199][200] Natural sources of nutrients in the Columbia River include weathering, leaf litter, salmon carcasses, runoff from its tributaries, and ocean estuary exchange. Major anthropogenic impacts on nutrients in the basin are due to fertilizers from agriculture, sewage systems, logging, and the construction of dams.^[201][202]

Nutrient dynamics vary in the river basin from the headwaters to the main river and dams, to finally reaching the Columbia River estuary and ocean. Upstream in the headwaters, salmon runs are the main source of nutrients.^[203] Dams along the river impact nutrient cycling by increasing residence time of nutrients, and reducing the transport of silicate to the estuary, which directly impacts diatoms, a type of phytoplankton.^[204] The dams are also a barrier to salmon migration and can increase the amount of methane locally produced.^[204] The Columbia River estuary exports high rates of nutrients into the Pacific,^[205] except for nitrogen, which is delivered into the estuary by ocean upwelling sources.^[206]

Watershed

Main article: Columbia River drainage basin

Near The Gorge Amphitheatre in George, Washington

Most of the Columbia's drainage basin (which, at 258,000 square miles or 670,000 square kilometres, is about the size of France)^[207] lies roughly between the Rocky Mountains on the east and the Cascade Mountains on the west. In the United States and Canada the term watershed is often used to mean drainage basin. The term Columbia Basin is used to refer not only to the entire drainage basin but also to subsets of the river's watershed, such as the relatively flat and unforested area in eastern Washington bounded by the Cascades, the Rocky Mountains, and the Blue Mountains.^[208] Within the watershed are diverse landforms including mountains, arid plateaus, river valleys, rolling uplands, and deep gorges. Grand Teton National Park lies in the watershed, as well as parts of Yellowstone National Park, Glacier National Park, Mount Rainier National Park, and North Cascades National Park. Canadian National Parks in the watershed include Kootenay National Park, Yoho National Park, Glacier National Park, and Mount Revelstoke National Park. Hells Canyon, the deepest gorge in North America,^[207] and the Columbia Gorge are in the watershed. Vegetation varies widely, ranging from western hemlock and western redcedar in the moist regions to sagebrush in the arid regions.^[209] The watershed provides habitat for 609 known fish and wildlife species, including the bull trout, bald eagle, gray wolf, grizzly bear, and Canada lynx.^[207]

The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) divides the waters of the Columbia and its tributaries into three freshwater ecoregions: Columbia Glaciated, Columbia Unglaciated, and Upper Snake. The Columbia Glaciated ecoregion, about a third of the total watershed, lies in the north and was covered with ice sheets during the Pleistocene. The ecoregion includes the mainstem Columbia north of the Snake River and tributaries such as the Yakima, Okanagan, Pend Oreille, Clark Fork, and Kootenay rivers. The effects of glaciation include a number of large lakes and a relatively low diversity of freshwater fish. The Upper Snake ecoregion is defined as the Snake River watershed above Shoshone Falls, which totally blocks fish migration. This region has 14 species of fish, many of which are endemic. The Columbia Unglaciated ecoregion makes up the rest of the watershed. It includes the mainstem Columbia below the Snake River and tributaries such as the Salmon, John Day, Deschutes, and lower Snake Rivers. Of the three ecoregions it is the richest in terms of freshwater species diversity. There are 35 species of fish, of which four are endemic. There are also high levels of mollusk endemism.^[210][211]

In 2016, over eight million people lived within the Columbia's drainage basin. Of this total about 3.5 million people lived in Oregon, 2.1 million in Washington, 1.7 million in Idaho, half a million in British Columbia, and 0.4 million in Montana. Population in the watershed has been rising for many decades and is projected to rise to about 10 million by 2030. The highest population densities are found west of the Cascade Mountains along the I-5 corridor, especially in the Portland-Vancouver urban area. High densities are also found around Spokane, Washington, and Boise, Idaho. Although much of the watershed is rural and sparsely populated, areas with recreational and scenic values are growing rapidly. The central Oregon county of Deschutes is the fastest-growing in the state. Populations have also been growing just east of the Cascades in central Washington around the city of Yakima and the Tri-Cities area. Projections for the coming decades assume growth throughout the watershed. The Canadian part of the Okanagan subbasin is also growing rapidly.^[209]

Climate varies greatly within the watershed. Elevation ranges from sea level at the river mouth to more than 14,000 feet (4,300 m) in the mountains, and temperatures vary with elevation. The highest peak is Mount Rainier, at 14,411 feet (4,392 m). High elevations have cold winters and short cool summers; interior regions are subject to great temperature variability and severe droughts. Over some of the watershed, especially west of the Cascade Mountains, precipitation maximums occur in winter, when Pacific storms come ashore. Atmospheric conditions block the flow of moisture in summer, which is generally dry except for occasional thunderstorms in the interior.^[209] In some of the eastern parts of the watershed, especially shrub-steppe regions with Continental climate patterns, precipitation maximums occur in early summer.^[212] Annual precipitation varies from more than 100 inches (250 cm) a year in the Cascades to less than 8 inches (20 cm) in the interior. Much of the watershed gets less than 12 inches (30 cm) a year.^[209]

Several major North American drainage basins and many minor ones border the Columbia River's drainage basin. To the east, in northern Wyoming and Montana, the Continental Divide separates the Columbia watershed from the Mississippi-Missouri watershed, which empties into the Gulf of Mexico. To the northeast, mostly along the southern border between British Columbia and Alberta, the Continental Divide separates the Columbia watershed from the Nelson-Lake Winnipeg-Saskatchewan watershed, which empties into Hudson Bay. The Mississippi and Nelson watersheds are separated by the Laurentian Divide, which meets the Continental Divide at Triple Divide Peak near the headwaters of the Columbia's Flathead River tributary. This point marks the meeting of three of North America's main drainage patterns, to the Pacific Ocean, to Hudson Bay, and to the Atlantic Ocean via the Gulf of Mexico.^[213][214]

Further north along the Continental Divide, a short portion of the combined Continental and Laurentian divides separate the Columbia watershed from the Mackenzie-Slave-Athabasca watershed, which empties into the Arctic Ocean. The Nelson and Mackenzie watersheds are separated by a divide between streams flowing to the Arctic Ocean and those of the Hudson Bay watershed.^[215] This divide meets the Continental Divide at Snow Dome (also known as Dome), near the northernmost bend of the Columbia River.^[216]

To the southeast, in western Wyoming, another divide separates the Columbia watershed from the Colorado–Green watershed, which empties into the Gulf of California. The Columbia, Colorado, and Mississippi watersheds meet at Three Waters Mountain in the Wind River Range of Wyoming.^[217] To the south, in Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming, the Columbia watershed is divided from the Great Basin, whose several watersheds are endorheic, not emptying into any ocean but rather drying up or sinking into sumps.^[213] Great Basin watersheds that share a border with the Columbia watershed include Harney Basin, Humboldt River, and Great Salt Lake.^[213] The associated triple divide points are Commissary Ridge North, Wyoming,^[218] and Sproats Meadow Northwest, Oregon.^[219] To the north, mostly in British Columbia, the Columbia watershed borders the Fraser River watershed. To the west and southwest the Columbia watershed borders a number of smaller watersheds that drain to the Pacific Ocean, such as the Klamath River in Oregon and California and the Puget Sound Basin in Washington.^[213]

Major tributaries

See also: List of tributaries of the Columbia River

The Deschutes River at its confluence with the Columbia

The Columbia receives more than 60 significant tributaries. The four largest that empty directly into the Columbia (measured either by discharge or by size of watershed) are the Snake River (mostly in Idaho), the Willamette River (in northwest Oregon), the Kootenay River (mostly in British Columbia), and the Pend Oreille River (mostly in northern Washington and Idaho, also known as the lower part of the Clark Fork). Each of these four averages more than 20,000 cubic feet per second (570 m³/s) and drains an area of more than 20,000 square miles (52,000 km²).

The Snake is by far the largest tributary. Its watershed of 108,000 square miles (280,000 km²) is larger than the state of Idaho. Its discharge is roughly a third of the Columbia's at the rivers' confluence but compared to the Columbia upstream of the confluence the Snake is longer (113%) and has a larger drainage basin (104%).

The Pend Oreille River system (including its main tributaries, the Clark Fork and Flathead rivers) is also similar in size to the Columbia at their confluence. Compared to the Columbia River above the two rivers' confluence, the Pend Oreille-Clark-Flathead is nearly as long (about 86%), its basin about three-fourths as large (76%), and its discharge over a third (37%).^[220]

Kp'itl'els (Brilliant), Sinixt village site at the confluence of the Kootenay and Columbia Rivers

Tributary	Average discharge		Drainage basin
	ft3/s	m3/s	mi2	km2
Snake River	56,900	1,610[7]	107,500	278,400[221]
Willamette River	37,400	1,060[7]	11,500	29,780[222]
Kootenay River (Kootenai)	30,650	868[223]	19,420	50,300[224]
Pend Oreille River	26,430	748[225]	25,800	66,800[226]
Cowlitz River	9,140	259[227]	2,586	6,700[228]
Spokane River	7,900	224[229]	6,680	17,300[230]
Lewis River	6,125	173[231]	1,046	2,710[232]
Deschutes River	5,845	166[9]	10,700	27,700[230]
Yakima River	3,542	100[233]	6,150	15,900[234]
Wenatchee River	3,079	87[235]	1,350	3,500[230]
Okanogan River	3,039	86[236]	8,200	21,200[237]
Kettle River	2,925	83[238]	4,200	10,880[239]
Sandy River	2,257	64[240]	508	1,316[241]
John Day River	2,060	58[242]	8,010	20,750[243]

See also

• Pacific Northwest portal
• Rivers portal

• Columbia Park (Kennewick, Washington), a 400-acre (160 ha) recreational area
• Columbia River Estuary
• Columbia River Maritime Museum, Astoria, Oregon
• Empire Builder, an Amtrak rail line that follows the river from Portland to Pasco, Washington
• Estella Mine, an abandoned mine with a view of the Columbia River Valley
• Historic Columbia River Highway, a scenic highway on the Oregon side
• List of crossings of the Columbia River
• List of dams in the Columbia River watershed
• List of longest rivers of Canada
• List of longest rivers of the United States (by main stem)
• List of longest streams of Oregon
• Lists of ecoregions in North America and Oregon
• Lists of rivers of British Columbia, Oregon, and Washington
• Okanagan Trail, a historic trail that followed the Columbia and Okanagan rivers
• Robert Gray's Columbia River expedition

Notes

1. Fourth at 7,500 m³/s after Saint Lawrence River that forms the boundary between New York and Canada, Mississippi River which is only 5,897 m³/s where it meets the Ohio, and Ohio River at 7,957 m³/s

References

1. Holbrook 1956.
2. National Park Service (2021). "Naming the Columbia River".
3. "Columbia Lake". Canadian Geographical Names Data Base. Natural Resources Canada. 2015. Archived from the original on September 30, 2015. Retrieved September 29, 2015.
4. Marsh, James H. (2013). "Columbia River". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Historica Foundation. Archived from the original on September 22, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
5. "Columbia River". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey. November 28, 1980. Retrieved April 1, 2008.
6. "The Columbia River". Columbia River Keeper. 2013. Archived from the original on September 24, 2012. Retrieved December 5, 2013.
7. Kammerer, J. C. (May 1990). "Largest Rivers in the United States". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on January 29, 2017. Retrieved April 1, 2008.
8. Kimbrough, R. A.; Ruppert, G. P.; Wiggins, W. D.; Smith, R. R.; Kresch, D. L. (2006). "Water Data Report WA-05-1: Klickitat and White Salmon River Basins and the Columbia River from Kennewick to Bonneville Dam" (PDF). Water Resources Data-Washington Water Year 2005. United States Geological Survey. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved April 1, 2008.
9. Loy et al. 2001, pp. 164–65.
10. "USGS 14246900 COLUMBIA RIVER AT PORT WESTWARD, NEAR QUINCY, OR".
11. "14105700 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE DALLES, OR".
12. "12472800 COLUMBIA RIVER BELOW PRIEST RAPIDS DAM, WA".
13. "12399500 COLUMBIA RIVER AT INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY".
14. According to the United States Geological Survey fact sheet, "Largest Rivers in the United States" Archived July 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, "Rivers are considered large on the basis of one or more of three characteristics: total length from source to mouth, area of basin (watershed) drained by the stream, and average rate of flow (discharge) at the mouth." The Columbia is the largest river of the Pacific Northwest in all three senses.
15. "The Atlas of Canada: Toporama – Topographic Maps". Natural Resources Canada. 2015. Archived from the original on May 9, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
16. Kowalski, Peter; Kaplan, Brian; Karus, Greg (March 7, 2001). "Health Consultation". Colville Federated Tribes. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Archived from the original on April 3, 2013. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
17. "Columbia Basin Project". U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 2009. Archived from the original on February 15, 2015. Retrieved September 2, 2009.
18. "Oregon's Publicly-Owned Waterways". Public Ownership of Submerged and Submersible Land. Oregon Department of State Lands. Archived from the original on May 27, 2010. Retrieved March 9, 2008.
19. "Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area". U.S. Department of Agriculture: Forest Service. Archived from the original on December 9, 2007.
20. Jacklet, Ben (October 19, 2004). "Columbia Pilot Pay Attracts Port's Eye". Portland Tribune. Archived from the original on February 6, 2012. Retrieved June 14, 2007.
21. Gibbs, Rafe (May 1954). "Guarding the Graveyard of Ships". Popular Mechanics: 128–32. Retrieved March 1, 2012 – via Google Books.
22. Lang, Bill (2008). "Columbia River". Center for Columbia River History. Archived from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved April 2, 2008.
23. This number was derived from the rivers list published in The Atlas of Canada by Natural Resources Canada.
24. "Frequently Asked Questions About Canada". The Atlas of Canada. Natural Resources Canada. 2008. Archived from the original on June 4, 2006. Retrieved September 7, 2008.
25. Gerber, Michele (1992). "Legend and Legacy: Fifty Years of Defense Production at the Hanford Site". University of Washington Center for the Study of the Pacific Northwest. Archived from the original on May 27, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
26. "USGS Real-Time Water Data for USGS 14105700 Columbia River at the Dalles, OR". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on July 15, 2014. Retrieved August 6, 2008.
27. NOAA Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (2013). "NOAA Tide Predictions". U.S. Department of Commerce. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved April 8, 2015.
28. Bishop 2003, pp. 13–14.
29. "The Geologic Story of the Columbia Basin". Bonneville Power Administration. Archived from the original on July 8, 2017. Retrieved June 20, 2017.
30. Bishop 2003, pp. 86, 128.
31. Bishop 2003, p. 98.
32. Bishop 2003, pp. 132, 150.
33. "The Cascade Episode". Burke Museum. 2016. Archived from the original on July 8, 2017. Retrieved June 20, 2017.
34. Bishop 2003, p. 195.
35. Bishop 2003, pp. 226–29.
36. Stelling & Tucker 2007, pp. 213–14, 230.
37. Bishop 2003, p. 227.
38. Houck & Cody 2000, p. 19.
39. Hill, Richard L. (September 9, 1999). "Radiocarbon Dates Indicate the Bonneville Landslide May Be Far Younger Than Thought". The Oregonian. Archived from the original on September 23, 2010. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
40. Reynolds, Nathaniel D. (December 2001). "Dating the Bonneville Landslide with Lichenometry" (PDF). Washington Geology. 29 (3/4): 11–16. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 30, 2015. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
41. Hill, Richard L. (May 15, 2002). "Science – Landslide Sleuths". The Oregonian. Archived from the original on September 6, 2008. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
42. O'Connor, Jim E. (September 2004). "The Evolving Landscape of the Columbia River Gorge: Lewis and Clark and Cataclysms on the Columbia". Oregon Historical Quarterly. 105 (3): 390–421. doi:10.1353/ohq.2004.0043. JSTOR 20615448. S2CID 131976728.
43. Norman, David K.; Roloff, Jaretta M. (March 2004). "A Self-Guided Tour of the Geology of the Columbia River Gorge—Portland Airport to Skamania Lodge, Stevenson, Washington" (PDF). Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved September 8, 2009.
44. Rybář, Stemberk & Wagner 2002, p. 695.
45. "Mount St. Helens". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on May 12, 2013. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
46. National Research Council (U.S.) 2004, p. 18.
47. Lemonick, Michael D.; Dorfman, Andrea; Cray, Dan (March 5, 2006). "Who Were The First Americans?". Time. Time, Inc. Archived from the original on August 23, 2013. Retrieved April 3, 2008.
48. Pryce 1999, p. 7.
49. Shuswap: What's in a Name, Jim Cooperman, in A Shuswap Passion column for the Shuswap Market News, shuswapwatershed.ca website Archived December 21, 2013, at the Wayback Machine (PDF)
50. Oldham, Kit (January 13, 2003). "Captain Robert Gray Becomes the First Non-Indian Navigator to Enter the Columbia River, Which He Later Names, on May 11, 1792". The Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History. HistoryLink.org. Archived from the original on September 29, 2015. Retrieved April 1, 2008.
51. Hunn 1990, p. 3.
52. Dove (Quintasket) 1990, pp. 100–01.
53. Satterfield 2003, p. 82.
54. Dohnal 2003, pp. 12–14.
55. Clark 2003, pp. 20–25.
56. Meinig 1995, pp. 23–25, 493, 496.
57. Boyd 1996, pp. 12–13.
58. Ulrich 2007, p. 8.
59. Boyd 1996, pp. 4–7.
60. Myron Eells (1910). "Review: Marcus Whitman, Pathfinder and Patriot". Bulletin of the American Geographical Society. 42 (4): 299. doi:10.2307/199162. hdl:2027/hvd.32044086439460. JSTOR 199162.
61. "Oregon History: Indian Wars". Oregon Blue Book. Archived from the original on October 24, 2018. Retrieved September 3, 2009.
62. Ulrich 2007, p. 14.
63. Ulrich 2007, p. 6.
64. Barber 2005, pp. 20–21.
65. Attributed to anthropologist Philip Drucker in Cultures of the North Pacific Coast in Netboy's The Columbia River Salmon and Steelhead Trout.
66. Netboy 1980, p. 14.
67. Tate, Cassandra (December 27, 2005). "Kettle Falls". HistoryLink.org. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
68. Willingham, William F. "Cascade Locks". Oregon Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on June 20, 2017. Retrieved September 8, 2009.
69. "Columbia River Fish Runs and Fisheries" (PDF). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. August 2002. pp. 2–3, 6, 47, 62. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2006.
70. Wilkinson 2005, pp. 159, 165.
71. Cain, Allen (September 2007). "Boils Swell & Whorl Pools". Oregon Historical Quarterly. 108 (4): 546–560. JSTOR 20615793.
72. Ronda 1984, p. 170.
73. Dietrich 1995, p. 52.
74. "Columbia River History: Commercial Fishing". Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2010. Archived from the original on February 10, 2013. Retrieved January 26, 2012.
75. "The Oregon Story". Oregon Public Broadcasting. 2001. Archived from the original on March 18, 2008. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
76. Ulrich 2007, p. 5.
77. Ulrich 2007, p. 11.
78. Dietrich 1995, p. 376.
79. Schick, Tony (September 24, 2022). "The racism, and resilience, behind today's Pacific Northwest salmon crisis". opb. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
80. Guggemos, Eva (February 27, 2024). "LibGuides: Indigenous History of Oregon: Timeline". pacificu.libguides.com. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
81. Reyna, Luna (February 1, 2023). "The Chinook Indian Tribe calls for restoration of federal recognition". Prism. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
82. Williams, Kale (July 27, 2023). "Tribes raise objections to renewable energy project in Columbia River Gorge". kgw.com. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
83. Hayes 1999, p. 9.
84. Hayes 1999a.
85. "Cape Disappointment State Park". National Park Service. 2006. Archived from the original on August 31, 2009. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
86. Denton 1924, p. 174.
87. Roberts 2005, p. 23.
88. Loy et al. 2001, p. 24.
89. "Captain Robert Gray Explores Grays Bay and Charts the Mouth of Grays River in May 1792". HistoryLink.org. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved May 16, 2009.
90. Jacobs 1938, p. 77.
91. Mockford, Jim (2005). "Before Lewis and Clark, Lt. Broughton's River of Names: The Columbia River Exploration of 1792". Oregon Historical Quarterly. 106 (4). Oregon Historical Society: 542–567. doi:10.1353/ohq.2005.0011. JSTOR 20615586. S2CID 165732801.
92. Friedman 2003, pp. 304–05.
93. Meinig 1995, pp. 73–79.
94. Mackie 1997, p. 318.
95. "The Final Leg of the Trail". End of the Oregon Trail Interpretive Center. Archived from the original on October 12, 2008.
96. Meinig 1995, pp. 72–73, 75, 117, 146–47, 169–70.
97. Reeder, Lee B. "Open the Columbia to the Sea". Center for Columbia River History. Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved April 3, 2008. URL is to a reprint of a 1902 magazine edition of the Pendleton Daily Tribune published by E. P. Dodd.
98. "Crossing the Columbia Bar" (PDF). Oregon State Marine Board. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 6, 2015. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
99. Mackie 1997, p. 136.
100. "The Oregon Story: A Chronology of Ports in Oregon". Oregon Public Broadcasting. January 18, 2007. Archived from the original on February 17, 2008. Retrieved February 15, 2008.
101. Affleck 2000, p. 6.
102. Corning 1977.
103. Timmen 1972, p. 14.
104. Timmen 1972, p. 32.
105. Gibbs 1964.
106. "Rewind—Editorials from Our Archives: 1905: 40-Ft. Depth Wanted". The Columbian. December 26, 2005. Archived from the original on December 28, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2008.
107. The Oregonian, January 1, 1895, p. 8
108. Scott & Scott 1924, p. 190.
109. "The Dalles-Celilo Canal on Columbia River opens to traffic on May 5, 1915". HistoryLink.org. Archived from the original on November 16, 2007. Retrieved November 26, 2007.
110. U.S. Wheat Associates (2016). "Overview of Wheat Movement on the Columbia River" (PDF). Pacific Northwest Waterways Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 31, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
111. Harris 1988, p. 209.
112. Koberstein, Paul; Durbin, Kathie (January 21, 1990). "Cleanup Study Already Bogged in Controversy". The Oregonian.
113. Koenninger, Tom (March 7, 2007). "Dredging Columbia a Very Big Job". The Columbian. Archived from the original on December 24, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2008 – via NewsBank.
114. Columbian editorial writers (August 26, 2006). "In Our View – Monitor the Dredging". The Columbian. Archived from the original on December 23, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2008 – via NewsBank.
115. Robinson, Erik (March 3, 2006). "State Rebukes Corps of Engineers Over Oil Spill". The Columbian. Archived from the original on December 21, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2008 – via NewsBank.
116. "Columbia River Channel Deepening – Maintenance Needed to Maximize Benefits" (PDF). Pacific Northwest Waterways Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
117. "Bush Budget Offers $15 Million for Dredging". The Columbian. February 8, 2006. Archived from the original on December 30, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2008 – via NewsBank.
118. King, Anna (October 2, 2007). "The Modern Day Columbia River – Part Two: Still Waters Run Deep and Deadly for Columbia River Salmon". Oregon Public Broadcasting. Archived from the original on May 2, 2016. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
119. "Bureau of Reclamation – About Us". U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 2008. Archived from the original on September 28, 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2008.
120. "Grand Coulee Dam". U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 2009. Archived from the original on May 24, 2017. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
121. "Floods and Flood Control". Northwest Council. Archived from the original on February 10, 2013. Retrieved October 6, 2008.
122. "[308 Program]; Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington); 308 Program summary". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Digital Library. 2015. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
123. Tate, Cassandra (October 1, 2005). "McNary National Wildlife Refuge". www.historylink.org. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
124. Schmidt, Emerson P. (February 1931). "The Movement for Public Ownership of Power in Oregon". The Journal of Land & Public Utility Economics. 7 (1): 52–60. doi:10.2307/3138633. JSTOR 3138633.
125. Dick, Wesley Arden (Autumn–Winter 1989). "When Dams Weren't Damned: The Public Power Crusade and Visions of the Good Life in the Pacific Northwest in the 1930s". Environmental Review. 13 (3/4). Forest History Society and American Society for Environmental History: 113–153. doi:10.2307/3984393. JSTOR 3984393. S2CID 155350722.
126. Columbia River Treaty: History and 2014/2024 Review (PDF) (Report). Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. April 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 14, 2012.
127. "Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project No. 2114 Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County Final Application for New License, Exhibit B: Project Operation and Resource Utilization" (PDF). October 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2013. Retrieved October 5, 2008.
128. "Treaty Relating to Cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin (with Annexes)". Center for Columbia River History. Archived from the original on April 5, 2016. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
129. "Dams of the Columbia Basin & Their Effects on the Native Fishery". Center for Columbia River History. Archived from the original on September 15, 2015. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
130. Pitzer 1994.
131. Egan 1990, p. 17.
132. National Research Council (U.S.) 2004, pp. 4, 22.
133. Randell, Heather; Curley, Andrew (September 1, 2023). "Dams and tribal land loss in the United States". Environmental research letters: ERL [Web site]. 18 (9): 094001. Bibcode:2023ERL....18i4001R. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd268. ISSN 1748-9326. PMC 10410305. PMID 37564914.
134. Rosenberg, John (July 19, 2000). "Sacred and Shared – Clergy Work to Save Columbia River". Christian Century.
135. "Celilo Falls and The Dalles Dam Historic Viewer". Oregon Historical Society. Archived from the original on January 17, 2013. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
136. Reischel, Tami S.; Bjornn, Theodore C. (November 2003). "Influence of Fishway Placement on Fallback of Adult Salmon at the Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River". North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 23 (4): 1215–1224. Bibcode:2003NAJFM..23.1215R. doi:10.1577/M02-113. ISSN 0275-5947.
137. "Chief Joseph Dam". The Center for Land Use Interpretation. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
138. Mize, Jeffrey (October 14, 2019). "Two tribes want three Columbia River dams removed". The Columbian. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
139. Flatt, Courtney (October 15, 2019). "Yakama And Lummi Nation Leaders Call For Removal Of 3 Lower Columbia River Dams". Northwest Public Broadcasting. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
140. Goodykoontz, Emily (October 15, 2019). "Tribes call for removal of Bonneville, and other dams, along Columbia River". oregonlive. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
141. Baumhardt, Alex (November 30, 2023). "Feds consider removing Snake River dams in leaked agreement with plaintiffs in lawsuit • Washington State Standard". Washington State Standard. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
142. Schick, Tony (December 21, 2023). "In a major shift, Northwest tribes — not US officials — will control salmon recovery funds". opb. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
143. Daly, Matthew (February 23, 2024). "White House, tribal leaders hail 'historic' deal to restore salmon runs in Pacific Northwest". AP News. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
144. "Chapter 2". Lake Roosevelt, Administrative History. U.S. National Park Service: Department of the Interior. Archived from the original on July 16, 2007.
145. Hines, Sandra; Sands, Yasmeen; Hunt, Lori Bona (February 14, 2005). "Tree-Ring Data Reveals Multiyear Droughts Unlike Any in Recent Memory". University of Washington Office of News and Information. Archived from the original on October 10, 2012. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
146. McNiel, Michelle (March 21, 2008). "State Cracking Down on Illegal Frost-Control Dams". Wenatchee World.
147. Harden 1996, p. 17.
148. Lillis, Kevin (June 27, 2014). "The Columbia River Basin Provides More Than 40% of Total U.S. Hydroelectric Generation". U.S. Energy Information Agency. Archived from the original on June 9, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
149. "Renewable Energy Explained". US Energy Information Administration. 2017. Archived from the original on June 11, 2017. Retrieved May 9, 2017.
150. "Chief Joseph Dam and Rufus Woods Lake". U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. November 19, 2003. Archived from the original on March 1, 2013. Retrieved April 3, 2008.
151. "Three Gorges Dam: The World's Largest Hydroelectric Plant". US Geological Survey. 2017. Archived from the original on June 24, 2017. Retrieved May 9, 2017.
152. Kinsey Hill, Gail (March 11, 2001). "Aluminum Industry Powering Down". The Oregonian.
153. Fehrenbacher, Gretchen (February 23, 2003). "Aluminum All But Gone". The Columbian. p. E1. Archived from the original on December 23, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2008 – via Newsbank.
154. McCall, William (November 22, 2002). "BPA Chief to Detail Strategy for Troubled Power Broker". The Columbian. p. C2. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019. Retrieved September 12, 2008 – via Newsbank.
155. Markoff, John; Hansell, Saul (June 14, 2006). "Hiding in Plain Sight, Google Seeks More Power". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 6, 2008. Retrieved September 11, 2008.
156. Mehta, Stephanie N. (August 7, 2006). "Behold the Server Farm! Glorious Temple of the Information Age!". Fortune. Archived from the original on June 12, 2015. Retrieved April 4, 2008.
157. "This is what happens when bitcoin miners take over your town". POLITICO. March 9, 2018. Archived from the original on March 15, 2018. Retrieved March 15, 2018.
158. Milstein, Michael (December 11, 2007). "Judge Rips Latest Plan to Help Salmon". The Oregonian.
159. Video: The Columbia (1949). United States Department of the Interior. 1949. Archived from the original on June 27, 2012. Retrieved February 22, 2012.
160. Heinz, Spencer (July 8, 2007). "Rolling Along the Columbia, Driving for Woody Guthrie". The Oregonian.
161. Morrow, Lance; Thornburgh, Nathan (July 8, 2002). "This Land Is Whose Land?". Time. Archived from the original on October 16, 2007. Retrieved April 4, 2008.
162. "Salmon and Steelhead". Bonneville Power Administration. Archived from the original on May 10, 2017. Retrieved July 1, 2017.
163. "White Sturgeon". Pacific Coast Marine Habitat Program. 1996. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
164. "Editorial". The Cornishman. No. 75. December 18, 1879. p. 4.
165. Benson 1908, pp. 44–57.
166. Smith, Courtland L. (April 17, 2016). "Seine Fishing". The Oregon Encyclopedia. Portland State University and the Oregon Historical Society. Archived from the original on June 21, 2017. Retrieved June 19, 2017.
167. Mueller 1997, p. 229.
168. "Upper Columbia White Sturgeon". Upper Columbia White Sturgeon Recovery Initiative. 2007. Archived from the original on June 11, 2017. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
169. "The Northern Pikeminnow Management Program". Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. August 25, 2008. Archived from the original on January 9, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
170. Hansen, Chris (July 7, 2005). "Fishing for Dollars". The Register-Guard.
171. Balzar, John (April 2, 1994). "As Wild Salmon Fade, Northwest Losing a Symbol". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 29, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
172. Swardson, Anne (December 30, 1994). "Mystery of Vanishing Salmon Puzzles Canadians; Commercial Fishermen, Indian Groups and Officials Dispute Who's to Blame for Drop in Harvest".
173. Enge, Marilee (March 3, 1994). "Lawsuit Targets Fishery Closure: Alaska Seeks to Reverse Policy on Snake River King Salmon Run" (subscription required). Anchorage Daily News. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
174. "Strict Fishing Limits Are Passed to Protect Salmon in Northwest". The New York Times. April 10, 1994. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
175. "Massive Coho Return Surprises Fisheries". The News Tribune. December 28, 1994. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
176. Healy, Melissa (March 31, 1994). "Are West's Dams Set in Stone? Bruce Babbitt Dreams of Razing Some of Them to Transform Rivers and the Interior Department. But Businesses Dependent on Cheap Water and Power Fear the Added Expense and Predict Job Losses". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 29, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2008.
177. Power Planning Council, Northwest (December 14, 1994). "1994 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program" (PDF).
178. Robinson, Erik (April 15, 2007). "Pressure Builds on Snake River Dams". The Columbian. Archived from the original on August 15, 2009. Retrieved April 4, 2008.
179. Monroe, Bill (September 11, 2006). "Oregon's Delicate Balance". The Oregonian.
180. Milstein, Michael (April 10, 2007). "Court Finds Feds No Help to Fish". The Oregonian.
181. Oregonian editorial writers (July 29, 2007). "A River Released to the Wild". The Oregonian.
182. Colburn, Kevin (March 14, 2008). "Clark Fork to Flow Free This Month". AmericanWhitewater.org. Archived from the original on June 17, 2011. Retrieved March 28, 2008.
183. Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility (2007). "Hanford History". Archived from the original on June 19, 2017. Retrieved April 4, 2008.
184. Hanford Health Information Network (2000). "An Overview of Hanford and Radiation Health Effects". Archived from the original on August 23, 2010.
185. "Radiation Flowed 200 Miles to Sea, Study Finds". The New York Times. July 17, 1992. Archived from the original on June 10, 2008. Retrieved January 29, 2007.
186. U.S. Department of Energy (2015). "Hanford Site". Archived from the original on October 1, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
187. Wolman, David (April 2007). "Fission Trip". Wired Magazine. p. 78.
188. Washington Department of Ecology. "Hanford Quick Facts". Archived from the original on August 12, 2007.
189. Jacklet, Ben (July 24, 2001). "Activist Plans an Epic Swim". The Portland Tribune. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
190. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008). "Columbia River Basin: A National Priority". Archived from the original on October 28, 2006. Retrieved April 4, 2008.
191. PETTINGILL, REBECCA (June 29, 2022). "Hope for Hanford". Columbia Basin Herald. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
192. Serres, Dan (February 13, 2023). "Standing Up For Clean Up At Hanford". www.columbiariverkeeper.org. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
193. Stang, John (December 5, 2023). "At long last, Hanford poised to clean up nuclear waste with glass | Cascade PBS News". crosscut.com. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
194. Pegg, J.R. (November 26, 2007). "Bush Change to NW Forest Plan Would Ease Logging". Environment News Service. Archived from the original on May 17, 2008. Retrieved April 1, 2008.
195. Wentz, Patty (May 29, 2002). "Swimming to Astoria". Willamette Week. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved November 22, 2007.
196. Anderson, Jennifer (July 9, 2004). "Challenge Sets Off Global Ripples". The Portland Tribune. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved June 7, 2007.
197. Smith, Anna V. "A tale of restored tribal lands turns bittersweet in the wake of an Oregon wildfire | Cascade PBS News". crosscut.com. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
198. Brynelson, Troy (May 10, 2022). "Environmental group, timber firm Weyerhaeuser to settle over pollution claims at Longview timber mill". opb. Retrieved May 2, 2024.
199. "Fate and Transport of Nitrogen | Environmental Assessment Program | Washington State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound". www.ecy.wa.gov. Archived from the original on December 8, 2017. Retrieved November 7, 2017.
200. Hamlet, Alan F.; Lettenmaier, Dennis P. (November 1, 1999). "Columbia River Streamflow Forecasting Based on ENSO and PDO Climate Signals". Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 125 (6): 333–341. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:6(333).
201. "Natural Sources of Nitrogen | Sources and Pathways | Environmental Assessment Program | Washington State Department of Ecology". www.ecy.wa.gov. Archived from the original on December 8, 2017. Retrieved November 4, 2017.
202. Hileman, James (July 1975). "Columbia River Nutrient Study". Environmental Protection Agency.
203. "Why Protect Salmon – Wild Salmon Center". Wild Salmon Center. Archived from the original on December 7, 2017. Retrieved November 27, 2017.
204. Friedl, Gabriela; Wüest, Alfred (April 1, 2002). "Disrupting biogeochemical cycles – Consequences of damming". Aquatic Sciences. 64 (1): 55–65. Bibcode:2002AqSci..64...55F. doi:10.1007/s00027-002-8054-0. ISSN 1015-1621. S2CID 44859140. Archived from the original on December 29, 2019. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
205. Gilbert, Melissa; Needoba, Joseph; Koch, Corey; Barnard, Andrew; Baptista, Antonio (July 1, 2013). "Nutrient Loading and Transformations in the Columbia River Estuary Determined by High-Resolution In Situ Sensors". Estuaries and Coasts. 36 (4): 708–727. Bibcode:2013EstCo..36..708G. doi:10.1007/s12237-013-9597-0. ISSN 1559-2723. S2CID 85414307.
206. Lohan, Maeve C.; Bruland, Kenneth W. (February 1, 2006). "Importance of vertical mixing for additional sources of nitrate and iron to surface waters of the Columbia River plume: Implications for biology". Marine Chemistry. 98 (2): 260–273. Bibcode:2006MarCh..98..260L. doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.003.
207. Booth, Bibi; Fischman, Shelly. "The Columbia River Basin". U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Archived from the original on April 11, 2008.
208. Meinig 1995, p. 4.
209. Bilby, Robert; Hanna, Susan; Huntly, Nancy; et al. (July 8, 2007). "Human Population Impacts on Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife" (PDF). Independent Scientific Advisory Board. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2013. Retrieved September 15, 2008.
210. Abell et al. 2000, pp. 166–69.
211. "Columbia Glaciated". World Wide Fund for Nature and The Nature Conservancy. 2008. Archived from the original on November 1, 2013. Retrieved September 25, 2008.; "Columbia Unglaciated". World Wide Fund for Nature and The Nature Conservancy. 2008. Archived from the original on November 1, 2013. Retrieved September 25, 2008.; "Upper Snake". World Wide Fund for Nature and The Nature Conservancy. 2008. Archived from the original on November 1, 2013. Retrieved September 25, 2008.
212. "Columbia River Water Management Report, Chapter 2" (PDF). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Water Management Division. 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2014. Retrieved September 19, 2008.
213. "Watersheds (map)". Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2006. Archived from the original on August 7, 2008.
214. Gonzalez, Mark A. (2003). "Continental Divides in North Dakota and North America" (PDF). North Dakota Geological Survey Newsletter. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2013. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
215. "Atlas of Canada: Drainage Basins". Natural Resources Canada. 2010. Archived from the original on March 14, 2016. Retrieved September 29, 2015.
216. Palmer & Thorington 1921, p. 119.
217. Gonzalez, Mark A. (2002). "Continental Divides in North Dakota and North America" (PDF). NGDS Newsletter. 30 (1). North Dakota Geological Survey: 5–6. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2016.
218. "Commissary Ridge North, Wyoming". Peakbagger.com.
219. "Sproats Meadow Northwest, Oregon". Peakbagger.com.
220. Calculated mainly with data from: "Water-resources data for the United States, Water Year 2007". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on December 6, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
221. "USGS Water Resources of the United States: Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units". United States Geological Survey. 2007. Archived from the original on June 25, 2017. Retrieved September 16, 2008. Sum of Subregion 1704, Upper Snake, Subregion 1705, Middle Snake, and Subregion 1706, Lower Snake.
222. "Willamette Watershed". Portland Bureau of Environmental Services. 2008. Archived from the original on April 15, 2017. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
223. Subbasin Overview Archived March 25, 2009, at the Wayback Machine , Kootenai Subbasin Plan Archived September 21, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Northwest Power and Conservation Council
224. "Balance of Power: Hydroelectric Development in Southeastern British Columbia". Touchstones Nelson: Museum of Art and History. 2007. Archived from the original on November 6, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
225. "Pend Oreille, Kettle, and Colville River Basins, and the Columbia River from the International Boundary to the confluence with the Spokane River" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 18, 2008. Retrieved October 19, 2008. Discharge data taken from a gauge at the US–Canada border, 16.1 miles (25.9 km) from the mouth, measuring data from about 25,200 square miles (65,000 km²), about 98 percent of the total watershed.
226. "Seven Mile Project Water Use Plan" (PDF). BC Hydro. December 8, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 22, 2017. Retrieved September 3, 2009.
227. "Water-data report 2007: USGS 14243000 Cowlitz River at Castle Rock, WA" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 29, 2008. Retrieved October 24, 2008. Discharge data taken from gauge 14243000 at Castle Rock, 17.3 miles (27.8 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 2,238 square miles (5,800 km²) or 85 percent of the total watershed.
228. Calculated by summing subbasin sizes listed in Lower Columbia Tributaries Archived October 2, 2008, at the Wayback Machine , Northwest Power and Conservation Council; and Toutle Management Plan Archived October 2, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Retrieved on September 16, 2008.
229. Benke & Cushing 2005, p. 650.
230. "Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on April 27, 2012. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
231. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board (December 2004). "volume II – Subbasin Plan Chapter G – NF and EF Lewis" (PDF). Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Fish & Wildlife Subbasin Plan. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 23, 2006. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
232. "Description: Lewis River Drainage, Mount St. Helens, Washington". United States Geological Survey. 1999. Archived from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
233. "Yakima River and Esquatzel Coulee Basins and the Columbia River from Richland to Kennewick, Water Resources Data-Washington Water Year 2005" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 18, 2008. Retrieved October 16, 2008. Discharge data from gauge 12510500 at Kiona, 29.9 miles (48.1 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 91 percent of the total watershed.
234. "Yakima Subbasin Plan Overview" (PDF). Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
235. "Wenatchee River Basin: 12459000 Wenatchee River at Peshastin, WA" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 8, 2012. Retrieved October 16, 2008.. Discharge data from gauge 12459000 at Peshastin, 21.5 miles (34.6 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 1,000 square miles (2,600 km²) or 77 percent of the total watershed.
236. Water Data Report WA-05-1 Archived April 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, chapter Okanagan River Basin Archived October 18, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on April 20, 2007. Discharge data taken at Malott, Washington, 17 miles (27 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 8,080 square miles (20,900 km²), about 97 percent of the total watershed.
237. School of Natural Resources (2001). "Okanagan River Basin" (PDF). University of Michigan. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved September 29, 2015.
238. "Water-Data Report 2007: 12404500 Kettle River near Laurier, WA" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 20, 2012. Retrieved October 18, 2008. Discharge data from a gauge near Laurier, 29.71 miles (47.81 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 3,800 square miles (9,800 km²), about 90 percent of the total watershed.
239. "Upper Columbia Subbasin Overview" (PDF). Northwest Power and Conservation Council. pp. 29–8. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
240. "Water-Data Report 2007: 14142500 Sandy River Below Bull Run River, near Bull Run, OR" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 20, 2012. Retrieved October 19, 2008. Discharge data from a gauge near Bull Run, 18.4 miles (29.6 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 436 square miles (1,130 km²), about 86 percent of the total watershed.
241. Taylor, Barbara (December 1998). "Salmon and Steelhead Runs and Related Events of the Sandy River Basin – A Historical Perspective" (PDF). Portland General Electric. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 27, 2015. Retrieved December 18, 2010.
242. "Water-Data Report 2007: 14048000 John Day River at McDonald Ferry, OR" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 20, 2012. Retrieved October 19, 2008. Discharge data from a gauge at McDonald Ferry, 20.9 miles (33.6 km) from the mouth, measuring the flow from about 7,580 square miles (19,600 km²), about 95 percent of the total watershed.
243. Powell, Russ; Delano, Kenneth (2004). "John Day River Subbasin Fish Habitat Enhancement Project" (PDF). Bonneville Power Administration. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 29, 2008. Retrieved October 18, 2008.

Sources

• Abell, Robin A.; Olsen, David; Dinerstein, Eric; Hurley, Patrick T. (2000). Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press. ISBN 978-1-55963-734-3.
• Affleck, Edward L. (2000). A Century of Paddlewheelers in the Pacific Northwest, the Yukon, and Alaska. Vancouver, British Columbia: Alexander Nicholls Press. ISBN 978-0-920034-08-8.
• Barber, Katrine (2005). Death of Celilo Falls. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-98546-6.
• Benson, Frank W. (June 1908). A Pamphlet Containing All Measures ... State of Oregon – via Google Books.
• Bishop, Ellen Morris (2003). In Search of Ancient Oregon: A Geological and Natural History. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press. ISBN 978-0-88192-789-4.
• Benke, Arthur C.; Cushing, Colbert E. (2005). Rivers of North America. New York: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-088253-3.
• Boyd, Robert (1996). People of the Dalles: The Indians of Wascopam Mission. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-1236-7.
• Clark, Ella E. (2003). Indian Legends of the Pacific Northwest. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23926-5.
• Corning, Howard McKinley (1977). Willamette Landings (2nd ed.). Portland, Oregon: Oregon Historical Society. ISBN 978-0-87595-042-6.
• Denton, V. L. (1924). The Far West Coast. Toronto: Dent. OCLC 918309366.
• Dietrich, William (1995). Northwest Passage: The Great Columbia River. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-97546-7.
• Dohnal, Cheri (2003). Columbia River Gorge: National Treasure on the Old Oregon Trail. Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7385-2432-0.
• Dove (Quintasket), Mourning (Christine) (1990) [1933]. Coyote Stories. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-8169-1.
• Egan, Timothy (1990). The Good Rain. New York: Knopf. ISBN 978-0-394-57724-1.
• Friedman, Ralph (2003). In Search of Western Oregon. Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton Press. ISBN 978-0-87004-332-1.
• Gibbs, James A. (1964). Pacific Graveyard (3rd ed.). Portland, Oregon: Binford & Mort.
• Harden, Blaine (1996). A River Lost: The Life and Death of the Columbia. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-03936-8.
• Harris, Stephen L. (1988). Fire Mountains of the West: The Cascade and Mono Lake Volcanoes. Missoula, Montana: Mountain Press Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87842-220-3.
• Hayes, Derek (1999). Historical Atlas of the Pacific Northwest: Maps of Exploration and Discovery. Seattle: Sasquatch Books. ISBN 978-1-57061-215-2.
• Hayes, Derek (1999a). Historical Atlas of the Pacific Northwest: Maps of Exploration and Discovery. Seattle: Sasquatch Books. ISBN 978-1-57061-215-2.
• Holbrook, Stewart (1956). The Columbia. San Francisco: Comstock Editions. ISBN 978-0-89174-051-3.
• Houck, Michael C.; Cody, M. J. (2000). Wild in the City. Portland, Oregon: Oregon Historical Society. ISBN 978-0-87595-273-4.
• Hunn, Eugene S. (1990). Nch'i-Wàna: The Big River. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-96851-3.
• Jacobs, Melvin C. (1938). Winning Oregon: A Study of an Expansionist Movement. Caldwell, Idaho: The Caxton Printers. OCLC 9474314.
• Loy, William G.; Allan, Stuart; Buckley, Aileen R.; Meacham, James E. (2001) [1976]. Atlas of Oregon. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon Press. ISBN 978-0-87114-102-6.
• Lyman, William Denison (1909). The Columbia River: Its History, Its Myths, Its Scenery, Its Commerce. G. P. Putnam's Sons. (see here for full online transcription)
• MacGibbon, Elma (1904). "Columbia River and Pullman" . Leaves of Knowledge. Washington State Library's Classics in Washington History collection. Shaw & Borden. ISBN 978-1-110-68495-3.
• Mackie, Richard Somerset (1997). Trading Beyond the Mountains: The British Fur Trade on the Pacific 1793–1843. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. ISBN 978-0-7748-0613-8.
• Meinig, D. W. (1995) [1968]. The Great Columbia Plain (Weyerhaeuser Environmental Classic ed.). University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-97485-9.
• Mueller, Ted (1997). Fire, Faults, and Floods: A Road and Trail Guide Exploring the Origins of the Columbia River Basin. Moscow, Idaho: University of Idaho Press. ISBN 978-0-89301-206-9.
• National Research Council (U.S.) (2004). Managing the Columbia River: Instream Flows, Water Withdrawals, and Salmon Survival. National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-09155-8.
• Netboy, Anthony (1980). The Columbia River Salmon and Steelhead Trout. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-95768-5.
• Palmer, Howard; Thorington, James Monroe (1921). A Climber's Guide to the Rocky Mountains of Canada. New York: Knickerbocker Press.
• Pitzer, Paul (1994). Grand Coulee: Harnessing a Dream. Pullman, Washington: Washington State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87422-110-7.
• Pipes, Nellie Bowden (1926). "Articles in the Oregon Historical Quarterly Relating to the Columbia River, Settlement of Astoria, Lewis and Clark Expedition" . Oregon Historical Quarterly. Vol. 27. Oregon Historical Society.
• Pryce, Paula (1999). Keeping the Lakes' Way: Reburial and Re-creation of a Moral World among an Invisible People. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-8223-7.
• Roberts, John E. (2005). A Discovery Journal: George Vancouver's First Survey Season – 1792. Trafford Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4120-7097-3.
• Ronda, James P. (1984). Lewis & Clark Among the Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-8990-1.
• Rybář, Jan; Stemberk, Josef; Wagner, Peter (2002). Landslides: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Landslides, Prague, Czech Republic, June 24–26, 2002. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-90-5809-393-6.
• Satterfield, Archie (2003) [1989]. Country Roads of Washington. Lincoln: iUniverse. ISBN 978-0-595-26863-4.
• Scott, Harvey W.; Scott, Leslie M. (1924). History of the Oregon Country. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Riverside Press. ISBN 978-0-665-16710-2.
• Stelling, Peter L.; Tucker, David S. (2007). Floods, Faults, and Fire. Bellingham, Washington: Geological Society of America. ISBN 978-0-8137-0009-0.
• Timmen, Fritz (1972). Blow for the Landing. Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton Printers. ISBN 978-0-87004-221-8.
• Ulrich, Roberta (2007). Empty Nets: Indians, Dams, and the Columbia River. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87071-469-6.
• Wilkinson, Charles F. (2005). Blood Struggle: The Rise of Modern Indian Nations. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-05149-0.

Further reading

• White, Richard. The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River (Hill and Wang, 1996)

External links

• Rivers portal

• BC Hydro
• Bibliography on Water Resources and International Law Peace Palace Library
• "Columbia River" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). 1911.
• "Columbia River" . New International Encyclopedia. 1905.
• Columbia River Archived September 29, 2016, at the Wayback Machine US Environmental Protection Agency
• Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area from the US Forest Service
• Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
• The short film "The Columbia (1949)" is available for free viewing and download at the Internet Archive.
• "Timeline of exploration of the Columbia". Archived from the original on January 2, 2008. Retrieved September 26, 2007., dating to the 17th century
• University of Washington Libraries Digital Collections – Tollman and Canaris Photographs Photographs document the salmon fishing industry on the southern Washington coast and in the lower Columbia River around the year 1897 and offer insights about commercial salmon fishing and the techniques used at the beginning of the 20th century.
• Virtual World: Columbia River National Geographic via Internet Archive