Modal share
Share of mode of transport From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type.[1] In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.
Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.[2]
Comparability of data
Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work.[3] Surveys covering entire metropolitan areas are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city.
Modal split of journeys to work
Summarize
Perspective
The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. Note that it is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver, car passengers and motorbikes (especially relevant for Asian cities).
Metropolitan areas with over 1,000,000 inhabitants
| Metro area | Walking | Cycling | Public transport | Private motor vehicle | Year | Survey area | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Adelaide | 3% | 1% | 11% | 85% | 2016[4] | GCCSA | Australia |
 Atlanta |
1% | 0% | 3% | 86% | 2016[5] | UA | USA |
 Mexico City | 1% | 1% | 71% | 22% | 2019[6] | Mexico | |
 Athens | 8% | 2% | 37% | 53% | 2006[7] | Greece | |
 Auckland | 5% | 1% | 12% | 81% | 2018[8] | MUA | New Zealand |
| Austin |
2% | 1% | 3% | 83% | 2019[9] | USA | |
| Baltimore |
3% | 0% | 7% | 84% | 2016[10] | UA | USA |
 Barcelona | 34.35% | 2.28% | 37.33% | 26.04% | 2018[11] | Spain | |
 Beijing | 21% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 2005/2011[12] | China | |
 Belgrade | 23% | 1% | 49% | 27% | 2015 | Serbia | |
 Berlin | 30% | 18% | 27% | 26% | 2018 | Germany | |
| Brisbane | 4% | 1% | 14% | 81% | 2016[13] | GCCSA | Australia |
 Brussels | 36% | 9% | 24% | 29% | 2022[14] | Belgium | |
 Bogota | 15% | 2% | 64% | 19% | 2008[12] | Colombia | |
| Boston | 5% | 1% | 14% | 73% | 2016[15] | UA | USA |
 Bucharest | 31% | 2% | 27% | 36% | 2015[16] | Other (taxi): 4% | Romania |
 Budapest | 32% | 1% | 47% | 20% | 2011 | Hungary | |
 Calgary |
4% | 1% | 8% | 84% | 2021 [17] | CMA | Canada |
| Chicago | 3% | 1% | 13% | 77% | 2016[18] | UA | USA |
| Cologne | 25% | 19% | 21% | 35% | 2017[19] | Germany | |
| Dallas | 1% | 0% | 2% | 90% | 2016[20] | UA | USA |
 Daejeon | 26% | 2% | 28% | 44% | 2012[21] | South Korea | |
 Delhi | 21% | 12% | 48% | 19% | 2008/2011[12] | India | |
| Detroit |
1% | 0% | 2% | 92% | 2016[22] | USA | |
| Denver |
2% | 1% | 4% | 81% | 2020[23] | UA | USA |
 Dhaka |
19% | 39% | 29% | 13% | 2009[24] | Bangladesh | |
 Dublin |
18% | 7% | 15% | 59% | 2020[25] | Ireland | |
| Edmonton |
3% | 1% | 6% | 87% | 2021 [26] | CMA | Canada |
| Guangzhou | 35% | 19% | 22% | 23% | 2021[27][28] | China | |
| Hamburg | 22% | 22% | 24% | 32% | 2022[29] | Germany | |
 Helsinki | 10.99% | 9.34% | 32.42% | 46% | 2016[30] | MA, Other: 0.5% | Finland |
 Hong Kong | 11% | 0.5% | 77% | 12% | 2011[31] | China | |
| Houston | 1% | 0% | 2% | 91% | 2016[32] | UA | USA |
| Indianapolis | 1% | 0% | 1% | 91% | 2016[33] | UA | USA |
 Jakarta | 1% | 0.2% | 20% | 78%* | 2019[34] | UA *67% motorbike | Indonesia |
 Kuala Lumpur | 0.5% | 0.5% | 21% | 78% | 2018[35] | Malaysia | |
| Las Vegas | 1% | 0% | 4% | 90% | 2016[36] | UA | USA |
 London | 26% | 2.5% | 44.5% | 27% | 2020[37] | UK | |
| Los Angeles | 3% | 1% | 5% | 85% | 2016[38] | UA | USA |
| Madrid | 34% | 0.5% | 25% | 40% | 2018[39] | Spain | |
 Manila | 9% | 2% | 44% | 45% | 2019[12] | Philippines | |
| Melbourne | 4% | 2% | 19% | 76% | 2016[13] | GCCSA | Australia |
| Miami |
2% | 1% | 4% | 87% | 2016[40] | UA | USA |
 Milan | 18% | 10% | 41% | 29% | 2014[41] | Italy | |
 Minsk | 13% | 1% | 63% | 20% | 2016[42] | Belarus | |
| Montreal | 5% | 2% | 22% | 70% | 2016[43] | CMA | Canada |
| Mumbai | 27% | 6% | 52% | 15% | 2008/2011[12] | India | |
| Munich | 33% | 21% | 22% | 24% | 2023[44] | Germany | |
 Nagoya | 15% | 13% | 30% | 43% | 2011[45] | Japan | |
| New York City | 30.7% | 1.1% | 32.1% | 30.2% | 2019[46] | UA | USA |
| Osaka | 7% | 19% | 61% | 13% | 2010[47] | Japan | |
| Ottawa |
8% | 2% | 18% | 72% | 2016[48] | CMA | Canada |
 Paris | 40% | 2% | 22% | 34% | 2020[49] | Parisiens | France |
| Perth | 3% | 1% | 12% | 84% | 2016[13] | GCCSA | Australia |
| Philadelphia | 4% | 1% | 10% | 80% | 2016[50] | UA | USA |
| Phoenix | 2% | 1% | 2% | 87% | 2016[51] | UA | USA |
| Portland | 3% | 3% | 7% | 78% | 2016[52] | UA | USA |
 Prague | 35% | 1% | 37% | 25% | 2021[53] | Czech Republic | |
 Rio de Janeiro | 29% | 3% | 43% | 25% | 2012[54] | UA | Brazil |
| Rome | 4% | 1% | 29% | 66% | 2014[55] | Italy | |
| San Antonio | 2% | 0% | 3% | 90% | 2016[56] | UA | USA |
| San Diego | 3% | 1% | 3% | 85% | 2016[57] | UA | USA |
| San Francisco | 5% | 2% | 20% | 64% | 2016[58] | UA | USA |
| San Jose | 2% | 2% | 5% | 84% | 2016[59] | UA | USA |
 Santiago | 34.5% | 4% | 29.6% | 25.7% | 2012[60] | UA | Chile |
| São Paulo | 32% | 1% | 36% | 31% | 2017[61] | UA | Brazil |
| Seattle | 4% | 1% | 10% | 77% | 2016[62] | UA | USA |
| Seoul |
N/A | 4% | 66% | 23% | 2014[63] | South Korea | |
| Shanghai | 27% | 20% | 33% | 20% | 2009/2011[12] | China | |
 Singapore | 22% | 1% | 44% | 33% | 2011[12] | Singapore | |
 Sofia |
N/A | N/A | 73%[a] | 27% | 2010[64] | Bulgaria | |
 Stockholm | 14% | 7% | 47% | 32% | 2011[65] | Sweden | |
| Sydney | 5% | 1% | 27% | 65% | 2020[66] | Deloitte | Australia |
 Taipei | 13% | 4% | 43% | 40% | 2016[67] | Taiwan | |
 Tel Aviv | 8.2% | 4.3% | 17.7% | 62.5% | 2022[68] | Israel | |
| Tokyo | 23% | 14% | 51% | 12% | 2008/2009[12] | Japan | |
| Toronto | 5% | 1% | 16% | 76% | 2021[69] | CMA | Canada |
| Vancouver | 6% | 2% | 15% | 75% | 2021[70] | CMA | Canada |
 Vienna | 32% | 10% | 32% | 26% | 2023[71] | Austria | |
 Warsaw | 18% | 3% | 47% | 32% | 2015[72] | Poland | |
| Washington, D.C. | 3% | 1% | 6% | 56% | 2022[73] | UA | USA |
Metropolitan areas with over 250,000 inhabitants
| Metro area | walking | cycling | public transport | private motor vehicle | year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Aarhus | 7% | 27% | 19% | 43% | 2004 |
| Alicante | 18% | 0% | 13% | 69% | 2004 |
 Amsterdam | 5% | 30% | 19% | 42% | 2020[74] |
| Bari | 13% | 1% | 14% | 72% | 2001 |
 Basel | 33% | 17% | 27% | 22% | 2015[75] |
| Bern | 30% | 15% | 32% | 22% | 2015[75] |
| Bilbao | 23% | 0% | 34% | 43% | 2004 |
| Birmingham | 1% | 1% | 25% | 66% | 2001 |
| Bologna | 8% | 4% | 21% | 67% | 2001 |
| Bonn | 28% | 15% | 17% | 41% | 2017[76] |
 Bratislava | 26.7% | 1.6% | 32.6% | 37.7% | 2014[77] |
| Brno | 5% | 2% | 57% | 32% | 2012[78] |
| Buffalo | 6% | 1% | 14% | 79% | 2012 |
| Bremen | 25% | 25% | 15% | 36% | 2018 |
| Bristol | 19% | 8% | 12% | 55% | 2011[79] |
| Canberra | 5% | 3% | 8% | 85% | 2016[13] |
| Christchurch | 4% | 6% | 5% | 84% | 2018[8] |
| Copenhagen | 30% | 26% | 18% | 26% | 2021[80] |
| Córdoba | 18% | 1% | 10% | 71% | 2004 |
| Dortmund | 19% | 10% | 22% | 49% | 2019 |
| Dresden | 26% | 18% | 20% | 36% | 2018 |
| Dublin | 13.2% | 7.6% | 21.5% | 48.5% | 2016[81] |
| Düsseldorf | 34% | 13% | 18% | 35% | 2017[82] |
| Edinburgh | 19% | 7% | 30% | 42% | 2009–2010[83] |
| Eindhoven | 3% | 24% | 8% | 65% | 2004 |
| Essen | 19% | 7% | 19% | 55% | 2019 |
| Florence | 8% | 4% | 21% | 69% | 2001 |
| Frankfurt | 11% | 15% | 30% | 44% | 2015 |
| Freiburg im Breisgau | 29% | 34% | 16% | 21% | 2017 |
| Gent | 15.6% | 33.8% | 11.2% | 39% | 2021[84] |
| Gdańsk | 20.8% | 5.9% | 32.1% | 41.2% | 2016[85] |
| Gijón | 24% | 0% | 17% | 59% | 2004 |
| Gothenburg | 12% | 14% | 21% | 52% | 2004 |
| Graz | 19% | 19% | 20% | 42% | 2018[86] |
| The Hague | 5% | 22% | 30% | 43% | 2004 |
| Halifax | 8% | 1% | 12% | 78% | 2016[87] |
| Hamilton | 4% | 1% | 10% | 84% | 2016[88] |
| Hanover | 26% | 19% | 19% | 36% | 2017 |
| Kraków | 28.4% | 1.2% | 36.3% | 33.7% | 2013 |
| Las Palmas | 15% | 0.42% | 13% | 68% | 2011[89] |
 Lisbon | 15.6% | 2.5% | 30.8% | 50.2% | 2020[90] |
| Málaga | 12% | 0% | 11% | 77% | 2004 |
| Malmö | 14% | 26% | 25% | 34% | 2018[91] |
| Murcia | 18% | 1% | 7% | 74% | 2004 |
| Naples | 13% | 0% | 26% | 60% | 2001 |
| Nuremberg | 30% | 15% | 23% | 32% | 2023[92] |
 Oslo | 29% | 6% | 30% | 34% | 2013 |
| Palermo | 12% | 1% | 9% | 78% | 2001 |
| Pamplona | 42% | 2% | 13% | 41% | 2013[93] |
| Poznań | 20.6% | 8.4% | 33.7% | 37.3% | 2019 |
| Quebec City | 2% | 6% | 11% | 80% | 2016[94] |
| Rotterdam | 5% | 14% | 25% | 56% | 2004 |
| Seville | 13% | 7% | 18% | 62% | 2014 |
| Stuttgart | 29% | 8% | 23% | 40% | 2017[95] |
 Tallinn | 14% | 2% | 34% | 49% | 2020[96] |
| Tampere | 10% | 10% | 14% | 66% | 2021[97] |
| Turin | 12% | 3% | 5% | 79% | 2004 |
| Utrecht | 25.3% | 48.4% | 5.4% | 18.7% | 2018[98] |
| Valencia | 16% | 1% | 21% | 62% | 2004 |
| Valladolid | 22% | 1% | 20% | 57% | 2004 |
| Vigo | 19% | 0% | 13% | 68% | 2004 |
 Vilnius | 36% | 0% | 26% | 38% | 2011[99] |
| Wellington | 21% | 4% | 23% | 49% | 2018[8] |
| Victoria (CMA) |
10% | 7% | 11% | 70% | 2016 |
| Winnipeg | 5% | 2% | 14% | 79% | 2016[100] |
| Wrocław | 24.2% | 6.3% | 27.6% | 41.4% | 2018 |
| Zaragoza | 45.91% | 2.90% | 23.71% | 26.88% | 2017[101] |
| Zürich | 33% | 12% | 32% | 21% | 2015[75] |
| Mean ± SD | 13±8% | 8±9% | 24±13% | 55±17% |
Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit[102]
Modal share targets
The Charter of Brussels[broken anchor], signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timișoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise.[103] The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure.[104]
The Canadian city of Hamilton adopted a similar modal share target plan in 2005.[105]
Modal share in the developing world
The modal share differs considerably depending on each city in the developing world.[106][107][108]
According to UNECE, the global on-road vehicle fleet is to double by 2050 (from 1,2 billion to 2,5 billion,[109] see introduction), with most future car purchases taking place in developing countries. Some experts even mention that the number of vehicles in developing countries will increase by 4 or 5-fold by 2050 (compared to current car use levels), and that the majority of these will be second-hand.[13][110]
Legislation impacting the modal share
Legislation can discourage car ownership through, for example, taxation and conditions on new car purchases). This could help in achieving a modal shift.[111]
See also
- Air travel demand reduction
- Car ownership
- Circulation plan
- Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles
- Intermodal passenger transport
- Mobility transition
- Mode choice (the decisions that determine Modal share, especially in traffic analysis and forecasting)
- Mode of transport
- Motonormativity
- Rail usage statistics by country
- Road reallocation
- Environmental aspects of the electric car
- Smart mobility
Notes
- Result achieved using the percentage of commuters using PT (63%) plus Taxi (3%) and additionally marshrutkas (7%).
External links
- Epomm – Modal share data for more than 300 Cities with more or less than 100,000 inhabitants, mostly in Europe Archived 2014-03-31 at the Wayback Machine
- – Modal share data and trends over the past 20 years for Australian cities (unpublished paper by David Ashley)
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.